Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 991–1016 | Cite as

Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers

  • Rebecca Blair
  • Robert SavageEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper reports a study exploring the associations between measures of two levels of phonological representation: recognition (epi-linguistic) and production (meta-linguistic) tasks, and very early reading and writing skills. Thirty-eight pre-reading Ottawa-area children, aged 4–5 years, named environmental print (EP), wrote their own name, identified correct names and EP words amongst foils and detected foil letters within EP and names. Results showed that phonological awareness and letter-sound knowledge were not related to EP recognition. Name writing accuracy and name identification were related to both levels of phonological awareness. Furthermore, name writing showed a unique association with phonological awareness even after letter-sound knowledge was controlled statistically. Pre-readers may first use meta-linguistic phonological awareness in their name writing and identification prior to learning to read.

Keywords

Environmental print Name writing Phonological awareness Pre-readers Spelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by a grant from the Butters Foundation to the first author and a Social Sciences and Health Research Council of Canada grant number 410-2004-1371 to the second author. We would like to thank Beth Moskovic for her help in developing the word set for the phonological awareness tasks in this study and also like to thank the staff and children at all of the nurseries for their hard work and enthusiasm for this project. We would like to thank Robert Savage McGill University Department of Educational Psychology Graduate studies Fellowship.

References

  1. Adams M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony J. L., Lonigan C. J., Burgess S. R., Driscoll K., Phillips B. M., Cantor B. G.. (2002). Structure of preschool phonological sensitivity: Overlapping sensitivity to rhyme, words, syllables, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 82:65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach S. A., Robinson R. J. (1992). Gender and grade level differences in the development of concepts about print. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 13:309–328Google Scholar
  4. Bloodgood J. W. (1999). What’s in a name? Children’s name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly 34:342–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowey J. A.. (1994). Phonological sensitivity in novice readers and nonreaders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 58:134–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady S., Shankweiler D. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  7. Caravolas M., Bruck M. (1993). The effects of oral and written language input on children’s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caravolas M., Hulme C., Snowling M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language 45:751–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll J. M. (2004). Letter knowledge precipitates phoneme segmentation, but not phoneme invariance. Journal of Research in Reading, 27:212–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson D. K., McCabe A., Anastasopoulos L., Peisner-Feinberg E. S., Poe M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95: 465–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon M., Stuart M., Masterson J.. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15:295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan L., Seymour P. H. K.. (2000). Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy. British Journal of Psychology 91: 145–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncan L., Seymour P. H. K., Hill S.. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition 63:171–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn L. M., Dunn L. M. (1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test-3hird Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance ServiceGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehri L. C. (1998). Word reading by sight and by analogy in beginning readers. In: C. Hulme R. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 87–111Google Scholar
  16. Ehri, L. C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental variation in word recognition. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy. Development and disorders. Guilford Press, Retrieved November 28, 2004 from http://www.tau.ac.il/education/homepg/iris-levin/library/Ehri%20&%20 Snowling%20variations%20in%20recognition.docGoogle Scholar
  17. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J.␣C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  18. Gombert J. E. (1992) Meta-linguistic development. Harvester: WheatsheafGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodall M.. (1984). Can four year olds “read” words in the environment? The Reading Teacher 37(6):478–482Google Scholar
  20. Goswami U. C., Bryant P. E. (1990) Phonological skills and learning to read. London and Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  21. Goswami U. C., East M.. (2000). Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics 21: 63–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gough, P. B., & Juel, C. (1991). The first stages of word recognition. In L. Reiben, & C.␣A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  23. Haney M. R.. (2002). Name writing: A window into the emergent literacy skills of young children. Early Childhood Education Journal 30:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston R. S., Anderson M., Holligan C.. (1996) Knowledge of the alphabet and explicit awareness of phonemes in pre-readers: The nature of the relationship. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkland L., Aldridge J., Kuby P.. (1991). Environmental print and the kindergarten classroom. Reading Improvement 28(4):219–222Google Scholar
  26. Kirtley C., Bryant P. E., MacLean M., Bradley L.. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 48:224–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuby P., Aldridge J.. (1997). Direct versus indirect environmental print instruction and early reading ability in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 18:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masonheimer P. E., Drum P. A., Ehri L. C.. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behaviour 16: 257–271Google Scholar
  29. McGee L. M.. (1986). Young children’s environmental print reading. Childhood Education, December:118–125Google Scholar
  30. Moe A. J., Hopkins C. J., Rush R. T. (1982). The vocabulary of first grade children. Springfield, IL: C. C. ThomasGoogle Scholar
  31. Morais J.. (2003). Levels of phonological representation in skilled reading and learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 16: 123–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morais J., Alegria J., Content A.. (1987). The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: A review. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 7:415–438Google Scholar
  33. Morris D., Bloodgood J. W., Lomax R. G., Perney J.. (2003). Developmental steps in learning to read: A longitudinal study in kindergarten and first grade. Reading Research Quarterly 38:302–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reiben L., Perfetti C. (1991). Learning to read; Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  35. Reutzel D. R., Fawson P. C., Young J. R., Morrison T. G., Wilcox B.. (2003). Reading environmental print: What is the role of concepts about print in discriminating young readers’ responses? Reading Psychology 24:123–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savage R., Stuart M.. (2001). Orthographic analogies and early reading: Explorations of performance and variation in two transfer tasks. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14: 571–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savage R., Stuart M., Hill V.. (2001). The role of scaffolding errors in reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal and a correlational study. British Journal of Educational Psychology 71:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seymour P. H. K., Duncan L. G., Bolik F. M.. (1999). Rhymes and phonemes in the common unit task: Replications and implications for beginning reading. Journal of Research in Reading 22:113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seymour P. H. K., Evans H. M.. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read. Reading and Writing 6: 221–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Share D.. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55:151–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stahl S. A., Murray B. A.. (1993). Environmental print, phonemic awareness, letter recognition, and word recognition. National Reading Conference Yearbook 42:227–233Google Scholar
  42. Stanovich K. E.. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21:360–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Statistics Canada (2001). Detailed highest level of schooling, age groups and sex for population 15 years and over, for Canada, provinces, territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2001 census – 20% sample data. Retrieved October␣16,␣2004 from http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/themes/ RetrieveProductTable.cfm?Temporal = 2001&PID = 55457&GID= 431515&METH  = 1&APATH = 3&PTYPE = 55440&THEME = 51&AID =  0&FREE = 0&FOCUS = 0&VID = 0&GC = 0&GK = 0&SC = 1&SR = 1&RL = 0&CPP = 99& RPP = 9999&D1 = 2&D2 = 0&D3 = 0&D4 = 0&D5 = 0&D6 = 0&d1 = 2Google Scholar
  44. Stuart, M. (2003). Children’s early reading vocabulary. Retrieved October 5, 2004 from http://www.ioewebserver.ioe.ac.uk/ioe/cms/get.asp?cid = 1076&1076_0 = 3521Google Scholar
  45. Stuart M., Coltheart M.. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition 30:39–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Treiman R.. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39:61–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Treiman R., Danis C.. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Memory and Language 27:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner R. K.. (1988). Causal relations between the development of phonological processing abilities and the acquisition of reading skills: A meta-analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 34:261–279Google Scholar
  49. Wepner S. B.. (1985). Linking logos with print for beginning reading success. The Reading Teacher 38: 633–639Google Scholar
  50. Wilkinson G. S. (1993) Wide range achievement test 3. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting CoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education Department of Educational and Counselling PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontreal QuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations