Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 517–542 | Cite as

Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer

  • Sandra Lyn Martin-Chang
  • Betty Ann Levy
Article

Abstract

Word reading fluency, as indexed by the fast and accurate identification of single words, predicts both general reading ability and reading comprehension. This study compared the effects of context training and isolated word training on subsequent measures of word reading fluency. Good and poor readers were given 12 repetitions of two sets of words; 48 new words were learned in each condition. Words were presented in a story during context training and on a computer screen during isolated word training. Target words were read in isolation at test, randomly displayed within a series containing 72 untrained words. Results show that words trained in isolation are remembered longer and read faster when presented in isolation at test compared to words trained in context. Theoretical implications are discussed in relation to transfer appropriate processing.

Keywords

Contextual facilitation Reading fluency Transfer appropriate processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was part of the first author’s doctoral thesis. We thank Ellen Gong, Joann Lim and our anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this paper, as well as the principals, teachers, and children for their continued support and participation. This research was supported by a graduate fellowship to the first author and an operating grant to the second author, both from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Allington R.L. (1978). Effects of contextual constraints upon rate and accuracy Perceptual and Motor Skills 48:1318Google Scholar
  2. Archer N., Bryant P. (2001). Investigating the role of content in learning to read: A direct test of Goodman’s model British Journal of Psychology 92:579–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourassa D., Levy B. A., Dowin S., Casey A. (1998). Transfer effects across contextual and linguistic boundaries: Evidence from poor readers Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 71:45–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Breznitz Z., Berman L. (2003). The underlying factors of word reading rate Educational Psychology Review 15:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chall J. S. (1967). Learning to read: the great debate New York McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  6. Craik F. I. M., Lockhart R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cunningham A. E., Stanovich K. E., Stanovich P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy Annals of Dyslexia 54:139–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowhower S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional reader’s fluency and comprehension Reading Research Quarterly 22:389–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehri L., Roberts K. (1979). Do beginners learn printed words better in context or in isolation? Child Development 50:675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehri L., Wilce L. (1980). Do beginner learn to read function words better in sentences or lists? Reading Research Quarterly 15:451–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faulkner H. J., Levy B. A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 58:1–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman K. S. (1965). A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading Elementary English 42:639–643Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins J. R., Fuchs L. S., van den Broek P., Espin C., Deno S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency Journal of Educational Psychology 95:719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston F. R. (2000). Word learning in predictable text Journal of Educational Psychology 92:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemoine H., Levy B. A., Hutchinson A. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor readers: Representations formed across repetitions Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 55:297–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Levy B. A., Abello B., Lysynchuk L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension Learning Disability Quarterly 20:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levy B. A., Nicholls A., Kohen D. (1993). Repeated readings: Process benefits for good and poor readers Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56:303–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin-Chang S. L., Levy B. A. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 18:343–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nation K., Snowling M. J. (1998). Individual differences in contextual facilitation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension Child Development 69:996–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson T. (1991). Do children read words better in context or lists? A classic study revisited Journal of Educational Psychology 83:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliphant G. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition Australian Journal of Psychology 35:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perfetti C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition In: P. Gough, L. Ehri, R. Trieman (Eds) Reading acquisition Hillsdale, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 147–174Google Scholar
  23. Perfetti C. A., Roth S. F. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill In: A. M. Lesgold, C. A. Perfetti (Eds) Interactive processing in reading Hillsdale, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp. 269–297Google Scholar
  24. Rajaram S., Srinivas K., Roediger H. L. (1998). A transfer-appropriate processing account of context effects in word-fragment completion Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24:993–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rashotte C. A., Torgesen J. K. (1985). Repeated readings and reading fluency in learning disabled children Reading Research Quarterly 20:180–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Samuels S. J. (1967). Attentional progress in reading: The effect of pictures on the acquisition of reading responses Journal of Educational Psychology 58:337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer H., Samuels S. J., Spiroff J. (1973). The effect of pictures and contextual conditions on learning responses to printed words Reading Research Quarterly 9:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanovich K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency Reading Research Quarterly 16:32–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stanovich K. E., Stanovich P. J. (1999). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition In: J. Oakhill, R. Beard (Eds) Reading development and the teaching of reading Oxford, UK Blackwell pp. 12–41Google Scholar
  30. Stanovich K. E., West R. F. (1983). On priming by sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thorndike E. L., Lorge I. (1952). The teachers word book of 30,000 words. New York Teacher College PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Tunmer W. E., Chapman J. W. (1995). Context use in early reading development: Premature exclusion of a source of individual differences? Issues in Education 1:97–100Google Scholar
  33. Tunmer W. E., Chapman J. W. (2002). The relation of beginning readers reported word identification strategies to reading achievement, reading related skills, and academic self-perceptions Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 15:341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkinson G. S. (1993). The wide range achievement test. Wilmington, DE Wide Range, IncGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolf M., Katzir-Cohen T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention Scientific Studies of Reading 5:211–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young A. R., Bowers P. G., MacKinnon G. E. (1996). Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers’ fluency and comprehension Applied Psycholinguistics 17:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McMaster University HamiltonCanda
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMount Allison UniversitySackvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations