Reading and Writing

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 173–199 | Cite as

The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults



‘Metalinguistic skill’ has emerged as an important measure of the sophistication of an individual’s mastery of language. Some of the impetus for studies of metalinguistic skills, stemmed from an interest in its contribution to the acquisition of literacy. The central debate in these studies has been the issue of whether metalinguistic skills appear as a product of cognitive development or as a product of literacy instruction. In addition, there is also an increased interest in the cross-linguistic perspectives, given that replication of some of this research in non-alphabetic scripts are at variance with the earlier studies on alphabetic scripts. In the current study, identical experiments were conducted on a group of pre-school children and a group of non-literate adults, in Kannada, to investigate their understanding of the relationship between written language and oral language in particular their understanding of the relationship between the ‘word’ and its ‘referent’ and the effect of literacy acquisition on the same. Overall, the results support the view that acquisition of literacy has a significant influence on an individual’s conception of words, though an interaction between cognitive maturation and literacy exposure cannot be ruled out.


Developmental Literacy induced Metalinguistics ‘Referent’ ‘Word’ 


  1. Bialystok E. (1986). Making concepts of print symbolic: Understanding how writing represents language First Language 15: 317–338Google Scholar
  2. Bialystok E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind Cognitive development 70(3): 636–644Google Scholar
  3. Ehri L. C., (1985). Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In: Olson D. R., Torrance N., Hildyard A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning. London: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 333–367)Google Scholar
  4. Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling (Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del nino). Exeter, NH: Heinemann (English Translation)/Mexico DF: Siglo Veintiuno Editors. (original work published in 1979). Cited in D.␣R. Olson, 1994Google Scholar
  5. Homer B. (2002). Literacy and metalinguistic thought: Development through knowledge construction and cultural mediation. In: Brockmeier J., Wang M., Olson D. R. (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond: Curzon (pp. 266–282)Google Scholar
  6. Homer B., Olson D. R. (1999). Literacy and children’s conception of words Written-Language-and-Literacy 2(1): 113–140Google Scholar
  7. Karanth, P. (1984). Inter-relationship of linguistic deviance and social deviance. ICSSRGoogle Scholar
  8. Karanth P. (1998). Literacy and language processes- orthographic and structural effects. In: de Oliviera M K, Valsiner J. (Eds.), Literacy in human development. New York: Ablex (pp. 145–160)Google Scholar
  9. Karanth P. (2003). Cross-linguistic study of acquired reading disorders: Implications for reading models, disorders, acquisition and teaching New York: Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
  10. Karanth P., Suchithra M. G. (1993). Literacy acquisition and grammaticality judgement in children In: Scholes R. (Ed.), Literacy: Linguistic and cognitive perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. (pp. 143–156)Google Scholar
  11. Karanth P., Kudva A., Vijayan A. (1995). Literacy and linguistic awarness. In: de Gelder B., Morais J. (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. London: Erlbaum. (pp. 303–316)Google Scholar
  12. Karanth P., Ahuja G. K., Nagaraj D., Pandit R., Shivashankar N. (1991). Cross cultural studies of aphasia In: Chopra J. S., Jaganathan K., Sawhney I. M., (Eds.), Modern trends in neurology. New Delhi: Churchill Livingstone. (pp. 95–106)Google Scholar
  13. Karmiloff–Smith A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Karmiloff-Smith A., Grant J., Sims K., Jones M., Cuckle P. (1996). Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a ‚word’ Cognition 58: 197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindamood P., Lindamood P. (2000). The Lindamood phoneme sequencing program for Reading, Spelling & Speech Pro Ed: USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Morais J., Cary L., Alegria J., Bertelson P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7: 323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olson D.R. (1994). The world on paper Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Piaget J. (1929). The child’s conception of word London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  19. Prakash P., Rekha D., Nigam R., Karanth P. (1993). Phonological Awareness, orthography and literacy. In: Scholes R. (Ed.), Literacy: Linguistic and cognitive perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. (pp. 55–70)Google Scholar
  20. Suchithra M. G., Karanth P. (1990). Linguistic profile test- Normative data for children in grade I to grade IV Journal of AIISH, MysoreGoogle Scholar
  21. Tunmer W. E. (1991). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In: Gough P. B., Ehri L., Treiman R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum (p. 105)Google Scholar
  22. Tunmer W. E., Pratt C., Herriman M. L. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research and implications. Berlin: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Kleeck A. (1994). Metalinguistic development. In: Wallach E., Butler K. G., (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some principles and applications. New York: Merrill/Macmillan. (pp. 53–98)Google Scholar
  24. Vygotsky L.S. (1934, 1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication sciences and DisordersMarywood UniversityScrantonUSA
  2. 2.MVS College of Speech and HearingMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations