Reading and Writing

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 385–400 | Cite as

Telephone Testing and Teacher Assessment of Reading Skills in 7-year-olds: I. Substantial Correspondence for a Sample of 5544 Children and for Extremes

Article

Abstract

Many research questions require the assessment of reading in large samples of children. We compared two nonconventional procedures for early reading assessment: test administration by telephone, and teacher assessment. Five thousand five hundred and forty four children participating in a longitudinal twin study were assessed by telephone using the Test of Early Word Reading Efficiency, and by their teachers using the UK National Curriculum criteria. A correlation of 0.69 was obtained between the TOWRE and Teacher Assessment for Reading. There was also good agreement between the two procedures for identification of children at the lower extreme. Both appear to be practical and valid for research studies.

Key words

Middle childhood Reading Reading problems Telephone assessment Teacher assessment Test of early word reading efficiency (TOWRE) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brandt, J., Spencer, M., Folstein, M. 1988The telephone interview for cognitive statusNeuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology1111117Google Scholar
  2. Cardon, L.R., Corley, R.P., DeFries, J.C., Plomin, R., Fulker, D.W. 1991Factorial validation of a telephone test battery of specific cognitive abilitiesPersonality and Individual Differences1310471050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dale, P.S. 1996

    Parent report assessment of language and communication

    Cole, K.N.Dale, P.S.Thal, D.J. eds. Assessment of Communication and LanguagePaul BrookesBaltimore161182
    Google Scholar
  4. Flynn, J.M., Rahbar, M.H. 1998Improving teacher prediction of children at risk for reading failurePsychology in the Schools35163172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harlaar, N., Dale, P.S., Plomin, R. 2005Correspondence between telephone testing and teacher assessments of reading in 7-year-olds: II. Strong genetic overlapReading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal18401423(this issue)Google Scholar
  6. Harlaar, N., Spinath, F.M., Dale, P.S., Plomin, R. 2005Genetic influences on word recognition abilities and difficulties: A study of 7-year-old twinsJournal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology46373394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoge, R., Coladarci, T. 1989Teacher based judgements of academic achievementReview of Educational Research59297313Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, N.E., Coltheart, M. 2001Routes to Reading Success and FailureTaylor & FrancisNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Juel, C. 1988Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth gradesJournal of Educational Psychology80437447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenny, D.T., Chakaluk, E. 1993Early reading performance: A comparison of teacher-based and test-based assessmentsJournal of Learning Disabilities26227236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kent, J., Plomin, R. 1987Testing specific cognitive abilities by telephone and mailIntelligence11391400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Legree, P.J., Fischl, M.A., Gade, P.A., Wilson, M. 1998Testing word knowledge by telephone to estimate general cognitive aptitude using an adaptive testIntelligence269198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neale, M.D. 1997The neale analysis of reading ability-second revised editionNFERWindsorGoogle Scholar
  14. Nesselroade, J.R., Pedersen, N.L., McClearn, G.E., Plomin, R., Bergeman, C.S. 1988Factorial and criterion validities of telephone-assessed cognitive ability measures: Age and gender comparisons in adult twinsSageNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrill, S.A., Rempell, J., Oliver, B., Plomin, R. 2002Testing cognitive abilities by telephone in a sample of 6- to 8-year-oldsIntelligence30353360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. QCA Key Stage 1: Assessment and reporting arrangements (1999). Great britain: Qualifications and curriculum authority.Google Scholar
  17. Share, D.L., Stanovich, K.E. 1995Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisitionIssues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology1157Google Scholar
  18. Sofie, C.A., Riccio, C.A. 2002A comparison of multiple methods for the identification of children with reading disabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities35234244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stanovich, K.E., Siegel, L.S. 1994Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference modelJournal of Educational Psychology862453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Storch, S.A., Whitehurst, G.J. 2002Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural modelDevelopmental Psychology38934947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Torgesen, J.K., Burgess, S.R. 1998

    Consistency of reading-related processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies

    Metsala, J.Ehri, L. eds. Word recognition in beginning readingErlbaumHillsdale161188
    Google Scholar
  22. Torgeson, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A. 1999Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE)Pro-Ed.Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  23. Trouton, A., Spinath, F.M., Plomin, R. 2002The Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A multivariate longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition, and problem behaviour in childhoodTwin Research5444448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallace, G., Hammill, D.D. 1994Comprehensive Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test: Examiner’s ManualPro-Ed.Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  25. Wechsler, D. 1992Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children3The Psychological CorporationLondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip S. Dale
    • 1
  • Nicole Harlaar
    • 2
  • Robert Plomin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communication Science and DisordersUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry CentreInstitute of PsychiatryLondonUK

Personalised recommendations