Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 17, Issue 9, pp 875–890 | Cite as

Length awareness predicts spelling skills in Finnish

  • Annukka Lehtonen
  • Peter Bryant
Article

Abstract

Abstract. The main type of phonemic analysis skill considered to affect spelling acquisition has been awareness of phoneme quality. However, it is also important to find out whether other measures of phoneme awareness might contribute to literacy acquisition. Thus, the influence of phoneme length and phoneme quality awareness on spelling in Finnish was compared. The Oddity task was used to assess phonemic awareness and spelling skills were investigated by a spelling-to-dictation task. The results showed that length awareness predicted spelling better than quality awareness did. Moreover, length awareness was more strongly related to spelling of long phonemes, which specifically require analysis of phoneme length, than to spelling of phoneme clusters not involving length analysis. Additionally, only length awareness predicted children's general spelling skills. These findings suggest that awareness of length, which is a phonemic attribute of the Finnish language, is connected to children's spelling skills more strongly than awareness of phoneme quality is.

Finnish Length awareness Phoneme awareness Regular orthographies Spelling acquisition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar
  2. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.Google Scholar
  3. Cataldo, S. & Ellis, N. (1990). Learning to spell, learning to read. In P.D. Pumfrey & C.D. Elliott (Eds.), Children's difficulties in reading, writing and spelling: Challenges and responses (pp. 101–125). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ho, C. & Bryant, P. (1997). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–951.Google Scholar
  5. Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401–413.Google Scholar
  6. Lehtonen, J. (1970). Aspects of quantity in Standard Finnish. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University.Google Scholar
  7. Lundberg, I., Olofsson, Å., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.Google Scholar
  8. Lyytinen, H., Leinonen, S., Nikula, M., Aro, M., & Leiwo, M. (1995). In search of the core features of dyslexia: Observations concerning dyslexia in the highly orthographically regular Finnish language. In V. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge II: Relationships to phonology, reading and writing (pp. 177–204). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Matilainen, K. (1985). Lukemaanopettamismenetelmien yhteydet oikeinkirjoitustaidon oppimiseen ensimmäisen lukuvuoden aikana [The connection between literacy teaching methods and spelling development during the first school year]. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
  10. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L., & Bechennec, D. (1998). Phonological mediation and semantic and orthographic factors in silent reading in French. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 3–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annukka Lehtonen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Bryant
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations