Reading and Writing

, Volume 17, Issue 7–8, pp 691–705

Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric



We tested the effects of morphological and orthographic differences between English, Hebrew, and Arabic on the functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres. University students who were native speakers of each of the three languages performed a lateralized consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) identification task. The stimuli were presented vertically in three conditions: left visual field (LVF), right visual field (RVF), and bilaterally (BVF). Three dependent measures were used: (1) exposure duration of the stimuli in order to achieve a 50% error rate, (2) total number of errors in each presentation condition and (3) the difference between errors on the first letter and errors on the last letter, a qualitative measure of sequential processing. Arabic readers required longer exposure durations of the syllables in order to achieve a 50% error rate than Hebrew readers, who in turn, required longer exposure durations than native English readers. Readers of all three languages evinced left hemisphere specialization for this linguistic task and a bilateral advantage. The qualitative patterns revealed that the Arabic and Hebrew speakers showed the same hemispheric difference pattern, that was different from the one shown by English readers, and that Arabic readers showed a qualitative pattern suggesting higher levels of sequential processes in both hemisphere than readers of Hebrew and English. We interpret this as reflecting the adaptation of hemispheric abilities to reading languages that differ in morphological structure and orthography.


Cross-Language Hemispheric Specialization Morphology Orthography Reading 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berman, R.A. 1978Modern Hebrew structureUniversity PublishingTel Aviv, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  2. Eviatar, Z. 1999Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwordsNeuropsychology13118Google Scholar
  3. Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R. 2000Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking childrenApplied Psycholinguistics21451471Google Scholar
  4. Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., Ganayim, D. 2004Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processingNeuropsychology18174184Google Scholar
  5. Eviatar, Z., Zaidel, E. 1992Letter matching in the hemispheres: Speed-accuracy tradeoffsNeuropsychologia30699710Google Scholar
  6. Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 27–44) B.V.: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Hellige, J.B., Bloch, M.I., Cowin, E.L., Eng, T.L., Eviatar, Z., Sergent, V. 1994Individual variation in hemispheric asymmetry: Multitask study of effects related to handedness and sexJournal of Experimental Psychology: General123235256Google Scholar
  8. Hellige, J.B., Cowin, E. 1996Effects of stimulus arrangement on hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction for processing letter trigramsNeuropsychology10247253Google Scholar
  9. Hellige, J.B., Taylor, A.K., Eng, T.L. 1989Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus informationJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15711722Google Scholar
  10. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, J., Aharon-Perez, Z. 2002Do the characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing?Neuropsychology16322326Google Scholar
  11. Koriat, A., Norman, J. 1985Reading rotated wordsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance11490508Google Scholar
  12. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T., Burton, L. 1983Are variations among right handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9329359Google Scholar
  13. Marsolek, C.J., Kosslyn, S.M., Squire, L.R. 1992Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphereJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18492508Google Scholar
  14. Stein, J., Walsh, V. 1997To see but not to read: the magnocellular theory of dyslexiaTrends in Neurosciences20147152Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making and Department of PsychologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Institute for Cognitive NeurologyRambam Medical CenterHaifa

Personalised recommendations