Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 1065–1077 | Cite as

In situ regeneration of sulfated Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3

  • Qifan Yu
  • Xuesong LiuEmail author
  • Hongfeng Chen
  • Shuang Liu
  • Peng Jiang
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The regeneration mechanism of sulfated Cu/SAPO-34 catalysts in reducing atmospheres (5% H2/Ar and NH3/Ar at 600 °C) was investigated by using a series of characterization methods. Hydrogen regeneration improved the catalysts’ NH3-SCR activity from 150 to 550 °C remarkably, while ammonia regeneration exhibited relatively less obvious promotion effect. The TPR of hydrogen and EPR spectra data show that the regeneration process affects the amount and the coordination of the active isolated Cu2+ species significantly. The desulfation increases the amount of isolated copper ions and improves the catalytic activity of SCR.

Keywords

Sulfated Cu/SAPO-34 deNOx Reducing atmosphere Regeneration Isolated Cu2+ 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51702215), the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (LGG19B070002), the Science and Technology Program of Shaoxing (2017B70051), Shaoxing University (No. 2016LG1001), National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (201810349011) and Xinmiao Talent Program of Zhejiang Province (2018R432003).

References

  1. 1.
    Hammershøi PS, Jensen AD, Janssens TVW (2018) Impact of SO2-poisoning over the lifetime of a Cu-CHA catalyst for NH3-SCR. Appl Catal B 238:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwak JH, Tonkyn RG, Kim DH, Szanyi J, Peden CHF (2010) Excellent activity and selectivity of Cu-SSZ-13 in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. J Catal 275:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blakeman PG, Burkholder EM, Chen HY, Collier JE, Fedeyko JM, Jobson H, Rajaram RR (2014) The role of pore size on the thermal stability of zeolite supported Cu SCR catalysts. Catal Today 231:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panahi PN (2017) Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over the SAPO-34 supported transition metal nano catalysts. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 121:773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao F, Walter ED, Washton NM, Szanyi J, Peden CHF (2013) Synthesis and evaluation of Cu-SAPO-34 catalysts for ammonia selective catalytic reduction. 1. Aqueous solution ion exchange. ACS Catal 3:2083–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xue JJ, Wang XQ, Qi GS, Wang J, Shen MQ, Li W (2013) Characterization of copper species over Cu/SAPO-34 in selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia: relationships between active Cu sites and de-NOx performance at low temperature. J Catal 297:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang L, Gaudet JR, Li W, Weng D (2013) Migration of Cu species in Cu/SAPO-34 during hydrothermal aging. J Catal 306:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng Y, Montreuil C, Cavataio G, Lambert C (2009) The effects of SO2 and SO3 poisoning on Cu/Zeolite SCR catalysts. SAE Tech. Paper 2009-01-0898:7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0898Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng Y, Lambert C, Kim DH, Kwak JH, Cho SJ, Peden CHF (2010) The different impacts of SO2 and SO3 on Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts. Catal Today 151:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu XS, Wu XD, Weng D, Si ZC, Ran R (2017) Migration, reactivity, and sulfur tolerance of copper species in SAPO-34 zeolite toward NOx reduction with ammonia. RSC Adv 7:37787–37796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu XS, Wu XD, Weng D, Si ZC (2015) Durability of Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst for NOx reduction by ammonia: potassium and sulfur poisoning. Catal Commun 59:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen MQ, Wen HY, Hao T, Yu T, Fan DQ, Wang J, Li W, Wang JQ (2015) Deactivation mechanism of SO2 on Cu/SAPO-34 NH3-SCR catalysts: structure and active Cu2+. Catal Sci Technol 5:1741–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang AY, Chen Y, Walter ED, Washton NM, Mei DH, Varga T, Wang YL, Szanyi J, Wang Y, Peden CHF, Gao F (2019) Unraveling the mysterious failure of Cu/SAPO-34 selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Nat Commun 10:1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Wang D, Liu Y, Kamasamudram K, Li JH, Epling WL (2014) SO2 poisoning impact on the NH3-SCR reaction over a commercial Cu-SAPO-34 SCR catalyst. Appl Catal B 156–157:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jangjou Y, Wang D, Kumar A, Li JH, Epling WS (2016) SO2 Poisoning of the NH3-SCR reaction over Cu-SAPO-34: effect of ammonium sulfate versus other S-containing species. ACS Catal 6:6612–6622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ji YY, Easterling V, Graham U, Fisk C, Crocker M, Choi JS (2011) Effect of aging on the NOx storage and regeneration characteristics of fully formulated lean NOx trap catalysts. Appl Catal B 103:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu XD, Lee HR, Liu S, Weng D (2013) Regeneration of sulfated MnOx–CeO2–Al2O3 soot oxidation catalyst by reduction with hydrogen. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar A, Smith MA, Kamasamudram K, Currier NW, Yezerets A (2016) Chemical deSOx: an effective way to recover Cu-zeolite SCR catalysts from sulfur poisoning. Catal Today 267:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su WK, Li ZG, Zhang YN, Meng CC, Li JH (2017) Identification of sulfate species and their influence on SCR performance of Cu/CHA catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 7:1523–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanaka H, Koga N (1988) Preparation amd thermal decomposition of basic copper(II) sulfates. Thermochim Acta 133:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghasri-Khouzani M, Meratian M, Panjepour M (2009) Effect of mechanical activation on structure and thermal decomposition of aluminum sulfate. J Alloy Compd 472:535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bin F, Song CL, Lv G, Song JN, Wu SH, Li XD (2014) Selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia over zirconium-doped copper/ZSM-5 catalysts. Appl Catal B 150–151:532–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu S, Wu XD, Weng D, Li M, Lee HR (2012) Combined promoting effects of platinum and MnOx-CeO2 supported on alumina on NOx-assisted soot oxidation: thermal stability and sulfur resistance. Chem Eng J 203:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang C, Wang J, Wang JQ, Yu T, Shen MQ, Wang WL, Li W (2017) The effect of sulfate species on the activity of NH3-SCR over Cu/SAPO-34. Appl Catal B 204:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang J, Yu T, Wang XQ, Qi GS, Xue JJ, Shen MQ, Li W (2012) The influence of silicon on the catalytic properties of Cu/SAPO-34 for NOx reduction by ammonia-SCR. Appl Catal B 127:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sultana A, Nanba T, Haneda M, Sasaki M, Hamada H (2010) Influence of co-cations on the formation of Cu+ species in Cu/ZSM-5 and its effect on selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Appl Catal B 101:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin QJ, Feng X, Zhang HL, Lin CL, Liu S, Xu HD, Chen YQ (2018) Hydrothermal deactivation over CuFe/BEA for NH3-SCR. J Ind Eng Chem 65:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pereda-Ayo B, Torre UDL, Illán-Gómez MJ, Bueno-López A, González-Velasco JR (2014) Role of the different copper species on the activity of Cu/zeolite catalysts for SCR of NOx with NH3. Appl Catal B 147:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kartheuser B, Hodnett BK, Riva A, Centi G, Matralis H, Ruwet M, Grange P, Passarini N (1991) Recovery of morpholine via reactive extraction. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:2105–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang DZ, Wei YX, Xu L, Chang FX, Liu ZY, Meng SH, Su BL, Liu ZM (2008) MgAPSO-34 molecular sieves with various Mg stoichiometries: synthesis, characterization and catalytic behavior in the direct transformation of chloromethane into light olefins. Micropor Mesopor Mater 116:684–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ma L, Cheng YS, Cavataio G, McCabe RW, Fu LX, Li JH (2013) Characterization of commercial Cu-SSZ-13 and Cu-SAPO-34 catalysts with hydrothermal treatment for NH3-SCR of NOx in diesel exhaust. Chem Eng J 225:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu XS, Wu XD, Weng D, Si ZC, Ran R (2017) Evolution of copper species on Cu/SAPO-34 SCR catalysts upon hydrothermal aging. Catal Today 281:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi YJ, Shu H, Zhang YH, Fan HM, Zhang YP, Yang LJ (2016) Formation and decomposition of NH4HSO4 during selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 150:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wijayanti K, Leistner K, Chand S, Kumar A, Kamasamudram K, Currier NW, Yezerets A, Olsson L (2013) Deactivation of Cu-SSZ-13 by SO2 exposure under SCR conditions. Catal Sci Technol 6:2565–2579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu CL, Huang BC, Dong LF, Chen F, Yang Y, Fan YM, Yang YX, Liu XQ, Wang XN (2016) Effect of Pr/Ce addition on the catalytic performance and SO2 resistance of highly dispersed MnOx/SAPO-34 catalyst for NH3-SCR at low temperature. Chem Eng J 316:1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pauza NL, Cotti MJP, Godar L, Sancovich AMFD, Sancovich HA (2005) Disturbances on Delta aminolevulinate dehydratase (ALA-D) enzyme activity by Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Na+, K+ and Li+: analysis based on coordination geometry and acid-base Lewis capacity. J Inorg Biochem 99:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh Y, Patel RN, Patel SK, Patel AK, Gutierrez A (2019) Experimental and quantum computational study of two new bridged copper(II) coordination complexes as possible models for antioxidant superoxide dismutase: molecular structures, X-band electron paramagnetic spectra and cryogenic magnetic properties. Polyhedron 171:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ma Y, Wu XD, Zhang JY, Ran R, Weng D (2018) Urea-related reactions and their active sites over Cu-SAPO-34: formation of NH3 and conversion of HNCO. Appl Catal B 227:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qifan Yu
    • 1
  • Xuesong Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hongfeng Chen
    • 3
  • Shuang Liu
    • 4
  • Peng Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringShaoxing UniversityZhejiangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Shaoxing Testing Institute of Quality and Technical SupervisionShaoxingChina
  4. 4.School of Materials Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations