Advertisement

Pd and Pt supported on mesoporous silica, silica–alumina and alumina as catalysts for benzene elimination in reformate gasoline

  • T. Rostamikia
  • N. Parsafard
  • M. H. PeyroviEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Mesoporous silica FDU12 and mesoporous silica–alumina (MSA) were successfully synthesized and used as supports. The corresponding Pd and Pt catalysts were investigated to reduce the benzene in reformate gasoline at 423–473 K. The catalysts were characterized by XRD, XRF, EDS-map, H2-adsorption, NH3-adsorption, Py-IR and N2 adsorption/desorption techniques. The influences of temperature on catalytic activity were studied by calculating the conversion and specific rate. All prepared catalysts showed high activity at low temperature. To evaluate the performance of catalysts, different H2/benzene molar ratios were used. The highest conversion of benzene is achieved at the low temperatures. The results demonstrated that the Pd/FDU12 catalyst has the best catalytic performance with suitable Lewis acid site properties. The MSA support demonstrated high activity in toluene conversion due to pore size and Brønsted and Lewis acid site amounts. Benzene molecules find a greater chance of hydrogenation at a high resident time in low H2/benzene molar ratio.

Keywords

Benzene elimination Reformate gasoline Catalytic activity Mesoporous silica FDU12 Acid site 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge from the Research Council of Shahid Beheshti University and Central Laboratory of Tehran Refinery.

References

  1. 1.
    The mobile source air toxics (MSAT2) detailed fuel property informationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Auto-Oil II program: air quality report, final version 7.1, October, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Official Journal of the European Communities, No L287 (2000) 46Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palmer RE, Shipman R, Kao SH (2008) Options for reducing benzene in the refinery gasoline pool. National Petrochemical and Refiners Association. NPRA annual meeting 2008. Curran Associates, Inc., San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wojcieszak R, Monteverdi S, Merey M, Nowak I, Ziolek M, Bettahar MM (2004) Nickel containing MCM-41 and AlMCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves: characteristics and activity in the hydrogenation of benzene. Appl Catal A 268:241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonçalves G, Lenzi MK, Santos OAA, Jorge LMM (2006) Preparation and characterization of nickel based catalysts on silica, alumina and titania obtained by sol–gel method. J Non-cryst Solids 352:3697–3704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar SK, John M, Pai SM, Niwate Y, Newalkar BL (2014) Low temperature hydrogenation of aromatics over Pt–Pd/SiO2–Al2O3 catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 128:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poondi D, Vannice MA (1996) Competitive hydrogenation of benzene and toluene on palladium and platinum catalysts. J Catal 161:742–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simon LJ, Van Ommen JG, Jentys A, Lercher JA (2002) Sulfur tolerance of Pt/mordenites for benzene hydrogenation: do Brønsted acid sites participate in hydrogenation? Catal Today 73:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin SD, Vannice MA (1993) Hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons over supported Pt catalysts. I. Benzene hydrogenation. J Catal 143:539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savva PG, Goundani K, Vakros J, Bourikas K, Fountzoula C, Vattis D, Lycourghiotis A, Kordulis C (2008) Benzene hydrogenation over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by conventional and sol–gel techniques. Appl Catal B 79:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewandowska A, Monteverdi S, Bettahar M, Ziolek M (2002) MCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves supported nickel—physico-chemical properties and catalytic activity in hydrogenation of benzene. J Mol Catal A 188:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peyrovi MH, Rostamikia T, Parsafard N (2018) Competitive hydrogenation of benzene in reformate gasoline over Ni supported on SiO2, SiO2–Al2O3, and Al2O3 catalysts: influence of support nature. Energy Fuel 32:11432–11439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu T, Zhang H, Yan X, Chen Z, Zou X, Oleynikov P, Zhao D (2006) Pore structures of ordered large cage-type mesoporous silica FDU-12s. J Phys Chem B 110:21467–21472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weitkamp J, Ertl G, Knözinger H (eds) (1997) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. VCH, Weinheim, p 439Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venezia AM, La Parola V, Pawelec B, Fierro JLG (2004) Hydrogenation of aromatics over Au–Pd/SiO2–Al2O3 catalysts; support acidity effect. Appl Catal A 264:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peyrovi MH, Toosi MR (2008) Study of benzene hydrogenation catalyzed by nickel supported on alumina in a fixed bed reactor. React Kinet Catal Lett 94:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boudjahem AG, Bouderbala W, Bettahar M (2011) Benzene hydrogenation over Ni–Cu/SiO2 catalysts prepared by aqueous hydrazine reduction. Fuel Process Technol 92:500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang L, Liu Q, Jing C, Yin J, Mominou N, Li S (2018) Simultaneous removal of sulfides and benzene in FCC gasoline by in situ hydrogenation over NiLaIn/ZrO2-r-Al2O3. J Hazard Mater 342:758–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prins R (2012) Hydrogen spillover. Facts and fiction. Chem Rev 112:2714–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Du P, Zheng P, Song S, Wang X, Zhang M, Chi K, Xu C, Duan A, Zhao Z (2016) Synthesis of a novel micro/mesoporous composite material Beta-FDU-12 and its hydro-upgrading performance for FCC gasoline. RSC Adv 6:1018–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry Science and PetroleumUniversity of Shahid BeheshtiTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Applied ChemistryKosar University of BojnordBojnordIran

Personalised recommendations