Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 126, Issue 2, pp 1097–1113 | Cite as

Single-step solvothermal process for synthesizing SnO2/Bi2WO6 composites with high photocatalytic activity in the photodegradation of C.I. Reactive Red 2 under solar light

  • Chung-Hsin WuEmail author
  • Chao-Yin Kuo
  • Cheng-Di Dong
  • Chiu-Wen Chen
  • Yi-Li Lin
  • Wan-Jing Huang
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Bi2WO6 (BW) and SnO2/Bi2WO6 composites (SnBWs) were synthesized by a single-step solvothermal process. Four SnO2/BW molar ratios, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 were used to generate 0.1SnBW, 0.25SnBW, 0.5SnBW and 1SnBW. The surface characteristics of BW, SnO2 and SnBWs were elucidated by X-ray diffractometry (XRD), transmission electron microscopy, specific surface area analysis, UV–vis spectrophotometry, photoluminescence spectrophotometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. C.I. Reactive Red 2 (RR2) was used as a target pollutant to compare the photocatalytic activities of the prepared SnBWs. The effects of RR2 concentration and photocatalyst dosage on RR2 photodegradation were elucidated. The XRD results revealed that all of the peaks of SnBWs in XRD patterns could be assigned to SnO2 or BW, and no other peak was found, indicating that SnO2 and BW were successfully composited. The band gaps of SnO2, BW, 0.1SnBW, 0.25SnBW, 0.5SnBW and 1SnBW were estimated to be 3.75, 2.85, 2.95, 2.94, 2.93 and 2.97 eV, which correspond to RR2 photodegradation rates under simulated solar light irradiation of 0.0025, 0.0255, 0.0333, 0.0279, 0.0408 and 0.0174 min−1. 0.5SnBW had the highest photocatalytic activity in RR2 photodegradation. The RR2 photodegradation rate increased as the 0.5SnBW dose increased, but decreased as the RR2 concentration increased. The results of adding scavengers suggested that the photogenerated holes were the main oxidative species in RR2 photodegradation in the 0.5SnBW system. The findings of this study suggest that the effective suppression of the recombination of electron–hole pairs in 0.5SnBW may improve the photocatalytic activity of 0.5SnBW over those of pure BW and SnO2.

Keywords

Bi2WO6 SnO2 Solar Solvothermal Photocatalysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology and National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 107-2221-E-992-001-MY2 and 107M01-1.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11144_2019_1540_MOESM1_ESM.doc (223 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 223 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Qu Y, Li Z, Sun N, Zhang X, Chen S, Jing L (2018) Visible-light induced electron modulation to improve photoactivities of coral-like Bi2WO6 by coupling SnO2 as a proper energy platform. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.037 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gui MS, Zhang WD (2011) Preparation and modification of hierarchical nanostructured Bi2WO6 with high visible light-induced photocatalytic activity. Nanotechnology 22:265601–265609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu SP, Xu CY, Wang WS, Ma FX, Zhen L (2014) Synthesis of Bi2WO6 hierarchical structures constructed by porous nanoplates and their associated photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Ceram Int 40:11689–11698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Selvi MH, Vanga PR, Ashok M (2018) Photocatalytic application of Bi2WO6 nanoplates structure for effective degradation of methylene blue. Optik 173:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gui MS, Zhang WD, Chang YQ, Yu YX (2012) One-step hydrothermal preparation strategy for nanostructured WO3/Bi2WO6 heterojunction with high visible light photocatalytic activity. Chem Eng J 197:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu L, Ding L, Liu Y, An W, Lin S, Liang Y, Cui W (2016) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity by Cu2O-coupled flower-like Bi2WO6 structures. Appl Surf Sci 364:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu X, Lu Q, Liu J (2016) Electrospinning preparation of one-dimensional ZnO/Bi2WO6 heterostructured sub-microbelts with excellent photocatalytic performance. J Alloys Compd 662:598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng J, Shen Y, Chen K, Wang X, Guo Y, Zhou X, Bai R (2018) Flower-like Bi2WO6/ZnO composite with excellent photocatalytic capability under visible light irradiation. Chin J Catal 39:810–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo Q, Huang Y, Xu H, Luo D, Huang F, Gu L, Wei Y, Zhao H, Fan L, Wu J (2018) The effects of solvent on photocatalytic properties of Bi2WO6/TiO2 heterojunction under visible light irradiation. Solid State Sci 78:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He W, Sun Y, Jiang G, Huang H, Zhang X, Dong F (2018) Activation of amorphous Bi2WO6 with synchronous Bi metal and Bi2O3 coupling: photocatalysis mechanism and reaction pathway. Appl Catal B 232:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raziq F, Qu Y, Humayun M, Zada A, Yu H, Jing L (2017) Synthesis of SnO2/B-P codoped g-C3N4 nanocomposites as efficient cocatalyst-free visible-light photocatalysts for CO2 conversion and pollutant degradation. Appl Catal B 201:486–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Min Y, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhang Y (2011) Synthesis of novel visible light responding vanadate/TiO2 heterostructure photocatalysts for application of organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 175:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Min Y, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhao W (2012) Synthesis of nanostructured ZnO/Bi2WO6 heterojunction for photocatalysis application. Sep Purif Technol 92:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bastami TR, Ahmadpour A, Hekmatikar FA (2017) Synthesis of Fe3O4/Bi2WO6 nanohybrid for the photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical ibuprofen under solar light. J Ind Eng Chem 51:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Tang H, Lv H, Zhang P, Ding Z, Li S, Guang J (2015) Facile hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2/Bi2WO6 hollow microsphere with enhanced visible-light photoactivity. Powder Technol 283:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Du Z, Cheng C, Tan L, Lan J, Jiang S, Zhao L, Guo R (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6/TiO2 composite coated polyester fabric under visible light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 435:626–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song X, Wang H, Li Y, Ye S, Dionysiou DD (2018) Solvothermal synthesis of P25/Bi2WO6 nanocomposite photocatalyst and photocatalytic degradation of ethylene under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 439:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuan L, Lu KQ, Zhang F, Fu X, Xu YJ (2018) Unveiling the interplay between light-driven CO2 photocatalytic reduction and carbonaceous residues decomposition: a case study of Bi2WO6-TiO2 binanosheets. Appl Catal B 237:424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Issarapanacheewin S, Wetchakun K, Phanichphant S, Kangwansupamonkon W, Wetchakun N (2016) Photodegradation of organic dyes by CeO2/Bi2WO6 nanocomposite and its physicochemical properties investigation. Ceram Int 42:16007–16016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dai W, Yu J, Deng Y, Hu X, Wang T, Luo X (2017) Facile synthesis of MoS2/Bi2WO6 nanocomposites for enhanced CO2 photoreduction activity under visible light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 403:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hao YJ, Li FT, Chen F, Chai MJ, Liu RH, Wang XJ (2014) In situ one-step combustion synthesis of Bi2O3/Bi2WO6 heterojunctions with notable visible light photocatalytic activities. Mater Lett 124:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Q, Dai Z, Cheng G, Liu Y, Chen R (2017) In-situ room-temperature synthesis of amorphous/crystalline contact Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 heterostructures for improved photocatalytic ability. Ceram Int 43:11296–11304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adhikari S, Kim DH (2018) Synthesis of Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 hierarchical microstructures for enhanced visible light driven photocatalytic degradation and photoelectrochemical sensing of ofloxacin. Chem Eng J 354:692–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zheng XJ, Li CL, Zhao M, Zheng Z, Wei LF, Chen FH, Li XL (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of butyric acid over Cu2O/Bi2WO6 composites for simultaneous production of alkanes and hydrogen gas under UV irradiation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:7917–7929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He GH, He GL, Li AJ, Li X, Wang XJ, Fang YP, Xu YH (2014) Synthesis and visible light photocatalytic behavior of WO3 (core)/Bi2WO6 (shell). J Mol Catal A 385:106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li S, Hu S, Jiang W, Liu Y, Liu J, Wang Z (2017) Facile synthesis of flower-like Ag3VO4/Bi2WO6 heterojunction with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interf Sci 501:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang J, Ma Z (2017) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance of Ag3VO4/Bi2WO6 heterojunctions in removing aqueous dyes and tetracycline hydrochloride. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 78:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang X, Gong Y, Dong X, Zhang X, Ma C, Shi F (2012) Fabrication and efficient visible light-induced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6/BiVO4 heterojunction. Mater Chem Phys 136:472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chaiwichian S, Inceesungvorn B, Wetchakun K, Phanichphant S, Kangwansupamonkon W, Wetchakun N (2014) Highly efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6/BiVO4 heterojunction photocatalysts. Mater Res Bull 54:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ju P, Wang P, Li B, Fan H, Ai S, Zhang D, Wang Y (2014) A novel calcined Bi2WO6/BiVO4 heterojunction photocatalyst with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem Eng J 236:430–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xue S, Wei Z, Hou X, Xie W, Li S, Shang X, He D (2015) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities and mechanism insight of BiVO4/Bi2WO6 composites with virus-like structures. Appl Surf Sci 355:1107–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tao R, Zhao C, Shao C, Li X, Zhang J, Yang S, Liu Y (2018) Bi2WO6/ZnFe2O4 heterostructures nanofibers: enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and magnetically separable property. Mater Res Bull 104:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu CH, Kuo CY, Wu JT, Hsu MJ, Jhang TJ (2016) Photodegradation of C.I. Reactive Red 2 in the Bi2WO6 system: determination of surface characteristics and photocatalytic activities of Bi2WO6. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 117:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sriwichai S, Ranwongsa H, Wetchakun K, Phanichphant S, Wetchakun N (2014) Effect of iron loading on the photocatalytic performance of Bi2WO6 photocatalyst. Superlattices Microstruct 76:362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumar SG, Rao KSRK (2015) Tungsten-based nanomaterials (WO3 & Bi2WO6): modifications related to charge carrier transfer mechanisms and photocatalytic applications. Appl Surf Sci 355:939–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lu Y, Zhao K, Zhao Y, Zhu S, Yuan X, Huo M, Zhang Y, Qiu Y (2015) Bi2WO6/TiO2/Pt nanojunction system: a UV–vis light responsive photocatalyst with high photocatalytic performance. Colloids Surf A 481:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xiao J, Dong W, Song C, Yu Y, Zhang L, Li C, Yin Y (2015) Nitrogen oxide gas-sensing characteristics of hierarchical Bi2WO6 microspheres prepared by a hydrothermal method. Mater Sci Semicond Proc 40:463–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gui MS, Zhang WD, Su QX, Chen CH (2011) Preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of Bi2O3/Bi2WO6 heterojunction photocatalysts. J Solid State Chem 184:1977–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li ZQ, Chen XT, Xue ZL (2013) Microwave-assisted synthesis and photocatalytic properties of flower-like Bi2WO6 and Bi2O3-Bi2WO6 composite. J Colloid Interf Sci 394:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bai S, Guo W, Sun J, Li J, Tian Y, Chen A, Luo R, Li D (2016) Synthesis of SnO2–CuO heterojunction using electrospinning and application in detecting of CO. Sens Actuators B 226:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tan G, Huang J, Zhang L, Ren H, Xi A (2014) An enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalyst: conduction band control of Bi2WO6 crystallites by Cu ion modification. Ceram Int 40:11671–11679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Qu Y, Wang H, Chen H, Han M, Lin Z (2016) Synthesis, characterization and sensing properties of mesoporous C/SnO2 nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B 228:595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Meng X, Zhang Z (2016) Bismuth-based photocatalytic semiconductors: introduction, challenges and possible approaches. J Mol Catal A 423:533–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Selvarajan S, Malathy P, Suganthi A, Rajarajan M (2017) Fabrication of mesoporous BaTiO3/SnO2 nanorods with highly enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J Ind Eng Chem 53:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cao TP, Li YJ, Wang CH, Zhang ZY, Zhang MY, Shao CL, Liu YC (2011) Bi4Ti3O12 nanosheets/TiO2 submicron fibers heterostructures: in situ fabrication and high visible light photocatalytic activity. J Mater Chem 21:6922–6927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bing X, Li J, Liu J, Cui X, Ji F (2018) Biomimetic synthesis of Bi2O3/Bi2WO6/MgAl-CLDH hybrids from lotus pollen and their enhanced adsorption and photocatalysis performance. J Photochem Photobio A 364:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chen Y, Yang S, Wang K, Lou L (2005) Role of primary active species and TiO2 surface characteristic in UV-illuminated photodegradation of Acid Orange 7. J Photochem Photobiol A 172:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang Y, Shao C, Li XH, Lu N, Zhang MY, Zhang P, Zhang X, Liu Y (2014) Controllable synthesis and enhanced visible photocatalytic degradation performances of Bi2WO6-carbon nanofibers heteroarchitectures. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 70:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Huang H, Liu K, Chen K, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang S (2014) Ce and F comodification on the crystal structure and enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6 photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 118:14379–14387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dong S, Ding X, Guo T, Yue X, Han X, Sun J (2017) Self-assembled hollow sphere shaped Bi2WO6/RGO composites for efficient sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 316:778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Hsin Wu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chao-Yin Kuo
    • 2
  • Cheng-Di Dong
    • 3
  • Chiu-Wen Chen
    • 3
  • Yi-Li Lin
    • 4
  • Wan-Jing Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Safety, Health and Environmental EngineeringNational Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyDouliuTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Marine Environmental EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiungTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Safety, Health and Environmental EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations