Advertisement

The role of the business press in the pricing of analysts’ recommendation revisions

  • Minkwan Ahn
  • Michael DrakeEmail author
  • Hangsoo Kyung
  • Han Stice
Article

Abstract

We investigate the information-dissemination role of the business press by examining the coverage of analyst recommendation revisions. Consistent with the press providing wider dissemination of analyst reports, we find evidence that coverage of analyst recommendation revisions significantly increases the initial market reaction to these revisions and decreases the subsequent price drift. Furthermore, we find that news flash coverage, rather than in-depth coverage, of a recommendation revision drives both the initial market reaction results and drift results. Finally, we show that broader press coverage influences the activities of large-trade institutional investors but not high-frequency traders. Overall, our findings suggest a complementary role between analysts and the business press: increased dissemination of recommendation revisions, rather than information creation on the part of the business press, serves to better inform the market about analyst recommendation revision decisions.

Keywords

Analyst recommendations Business press Market reactions 

JEL Codes

M41 L82 G14 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Artur Hugon, Derrald Stice, Jake Thornock, Brady Twedt, Andrew Van Buskirk, Roger White, and workshop participants at Arizona State University. All mistakes are our own.

References

  1. Altınkılıç, O., & Hansen, R. S. (2009). On the information role of stock recommendation revisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiram, D., Owens, E., & Rozenbaum, O. (2016). Do information releases increase or decrease information asymmetry? New evidence from analyst forecast announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asquith, P., Mikhail, M. B., & Au, A. S. (2005). Information content of equity analyst reports. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 245282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2007). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 296–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer, A., & Guttman, I. (2012). Voluntary disclosure, manipulation, and real effects. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1141–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, N., Chakrabarty, B., & Wang, X. (2017). Earnings announcements in high speed markets: Do high frequency traders bring fundamental information into prices? Working paper, Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar
  8. Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Zhu, C. (2018). Capital market effects of media synthesis and dissemination: Evidence from robo-journalism. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloomfield, R. J. (2002). The “incomplete revelation hypothesis” and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 16(3), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boni, L., & Womack, K. L. (2006). Analysts, industries, and price momentum. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonner, S. E., Hugon, A., & Walther, B. R. (2007). Investor reaction to celebrity analysts: The case of earnings forecast revisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(3), 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley, D., Clarke, J., Lee, S., & Ornthanalai, C. (2014). Are analysts’ recommendations informative? Intraday evidence on the impact of time stamp delays. The Journal of Finance, 69(2), 645–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2014). High-frequency trading and price discovery. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2267–2306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, L. D., Call, A. C., Clement, M. B., & Sharp, N. Y. (2015). Inside the “black box” of sell-side financial analysts. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bushee, B., Cedergren, M. & Michels, J. (2018). Does the media help or hurt retial investors duing the IPO quiet period? Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  16. Bushee, B. J., Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Hamm, S. J. W. (2010). The role of the business press as an information intermediary. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bushee, B. J., Matsumoto, D. A., & Miller, G. S. (2003). Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, W. S. (2003). Stock price reaction to news and no-news: Drift and reversal after headlines. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2), 223–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, Q., Francis, J., & Jiang, W. (2005). Investor learning about analyst predictive ability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
  20. Clement, M. B., & Tse, S. Y. (2005). Financial Analyst Characteristics and Herding Behavior in Forecasting. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dougal, C., Engelberg, J., García, D., & Parsons, C. A. (2012). Journalists and the stock market. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(3), 639–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drake, M. S., Guest, N. M., & Twedt, B. J. (2014). The media and mispricing: The role of the business press in the pricing of accounting information. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1673–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drake, M. S., Thornock, J. R., & Twedt, B. J. (2017). The internet as an information intermediary. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fang, L., & Peress, J. (2009). Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2023–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer, P. E., & Stocken, P. C. (2001). Imperfect information and credible communication. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer, P. E., & Stocken, P. C. (2010). Analyst Information Acquisition and Communication. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 1985–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408.Google Scholar
  28. Groysberg, B., & Healy, P. M. (2013). The Stock Selection and Performance of Buy-Side Analysts. Management Science, 59(5), 1062–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Groysberg, B., Healy, P. M., & Maber, D. A. (2011). What drives sell-side analyst compensation at high-status investment banks? Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 969–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2003). Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1), 337–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hong, H., & Kubik, J. D. (2003). Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. The Journal of Finance, 58, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Solomon, A. (2000). Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. The Rand Journal of Economics, 31(1), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (1999). A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading, and overreaction in asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2143–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ivković, Z., & Jegadeesh, N. (2004). The timing and value of forecast and recommendation revisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(3), 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jegadeesh, N., & Kim, W. (2010). Do analysts herd? An analysis of recommendations and market reactions. The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 901–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kadan, O., Madureira, L., Wang, R., & Zach, T. (2009). Conflicts of interest and stock recommendations: The effects of the global settlement and related regulations. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(10), 4189–4217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, C. M. C. (2001). Market efficiency and accounting research: A discussion of ‘Capital market research in accounting’ by S. P. Kothari. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lennox, C., Francis, J., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li, E. X., Ramesh, K., & Shen, M. (2011). The role of newswires in screening and disseminating value-relevant information in periodic SEC reports. The Accounting Review, 86(2), 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, E. X., Ramesh, K., Shen, M., & Wu, J. S. (2015). Do analyst stock recommendations piggyback on recent corporate news? An analysis of regular-hour and after-hours revisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(4), 821–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lim, T. (2001). Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loh, R. K., & Stulz, R. M. (2011). When are analyst recommendation changes influential? The Review of Financial Studies, 24(2), 593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayew, W. J. (2008). Evidence of management discrimination among analysts during earnings conference calls. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 627–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mikhail, M. B., Walther, B. R., & Willis, R. H. (2004). Do security analysts exhibit persistent differences in stock picking ability? Journal of Financial Economics, 74(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller, G. S. (2006). The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 1001–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, G. S., & Skinner, D. J. (2015). The evolving disclosure landscape: How changes in technology, the media, and capital markets are affecting disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgan, J., & Stocken, P. C. (2003). An analysis of stock recommendations. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(1), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peress, J. (2008). Media coverage and investors’ attention to earnings announcements. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar
  50. Rees, L., Sharp, N., & Twedt, B. J. (2015). Who’s Heard on the Street? Determinants and Conseqwuences of Financial Analyst Coverage in the Business Press. Review of Accounting Studies, 20, 173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schipper, K. (1991). Analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5, 105–131.Google Scholar
  52. Soltes, E. (2010). Disseminating firm disclosures. Working paper, Harvard University. Google Scholar
  53. Tetlock, P. C. (2010). Does public financial news resolve asymmetric information? The Review of Financial Studies, 23(9), 3520–3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Twedt, B. (2016). Spreading the word: Price discovery and newswire dissemination of management earnings guidance. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vega, C. (2006). Stock price reaction to public and private information. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(1), 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weller, M. B. (2017). Does algorithmic trading reduce information acquisition? The Review of Financial Studies, 31(6), 2184–2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Womack, K. L. (1996). Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investment value? The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang, S. S. (2012). Need for speed: An empirical analysis of hard and soft information in a high frequency world. Working Paper, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  3. 3.The Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations