Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1307–1339 | Cite as

Shareholder activism and voluntary disclosure

  • Thomas BourveauEmail author
  • Jordan Schoenfeld


We examine the relation between shareholder activism and voluntary disclosure. An important consequence of voluntary disclosure is less adverse selection in the capital markets. One class of traders that finds less adverse selection unprofitable is activist investors who target mispriced firms whose valuations they can improve. Consistent with this idea, we find that managers issue earnings and sales forecasts more frequently when their firm is more at risk of attack by activist investors, and that these additional disclosures reduce the likelihood of becoming an activist’s target. These additional disclosures also prompt a positive price reaction, contain more precise guidance, and exceed prevailing market expectations. These findings imply that managers use voluntary disclosure to preempt activism at their firm, and that activists prefer to target relatively opaque firms.


Corporate disclosure Corporate governance Investor relations Shareholder activism 

JEL Classification

G10 G34 M41 



We appreciate helpful comments and suggestions from an anonymous reviewer, Russell Lundholm (the editor), Ian Appel, Young Jun Cho (discussant), Pete Clarkson (discussant), Yonca Ertimur, Fabrizio Ferri, Sterling Huang, Wei Jiang, Roby Lehavy, Venky Nagar, Gaizka Ormazabal, Ewa Sletten, Guochang Zhang, and seminar participants at HEC Paris, Maastricht University, the University of Michigan, the 2015 Singapore Management University Accounting Symposium, and the 2016 UTS Australian Summer Accounting Conference. We also thank the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation for featuring this paper on October 21, 2015.


  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (1999). Handbook of Labor Economics. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Badertscher, B., Shroff, N., & White, H. (2013). Externalities of public firm presence: Evidence from private firms’ investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 682–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan, K., Billings, M., Kelly, B., & Ljungqvist, A. (2014). Shaping liquidity: on the causal effects of disclosure and liquidity. Journal of Finance, 69, 2237–2278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bebchuk, L., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 783–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyer, A., Cohen, D., Lys, T., & Walther, B. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binder, J. (1985). Measuring the effects of regulation with stock price data. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird, A., & Karolyi, S. (2016). Do institutional investors demand public disclosure? The Review of Financial Studies, 29(12), 3245–3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boone, A., & White, J. (2015). The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 508–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Kim, H. (2015). The real effects of hedge fund activism: productivity, asset allocation, and labor outcomes. Review of Financial Studies, 28 (10), 2723–2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., & Thomas, R. (2008). Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 63, 1729–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bushee, B., & Miller, G. (2012). Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 867–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bushee, B., & Noe, C. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bushman, R. (1995). Voluntary disclosures and the trading behavior of corporate insiders. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, J., & Jung, M. J. (2016). Activist hedge funds and firm fisclosure. Review of Financial Economics, 29, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, S., Nagar, V., & Rajan, M. (2004). Identifying control motives in managerial ownership: Evidence from antitakeover legislation. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 637–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chuk, E., Matsumoto, D., & Miller, G. (2013). Assessing methods of identifying man- agement forecasts: CIG vs. researcher collected. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimitrov, V., & Jain, P. (2011). It’s showtime: do managers report better news before annual ahareholder meetings? Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1193–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edmans, A., Fang, V., & Zur, E. (2013). The effect of liquidity on governance. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1443–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edmans, A., & Holderness, C. (2016). Blockholders: a survey of theory and evidence. Forthcoming in the Handbook of Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
  23. Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Muslu, V. (2011). Shareholder activism and CEO pay. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 535–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ertimur, Y., Sletten, E., & Sunder, Y. (2014). Large shareholders and disclosure strategies: Evidence from IPO lockup expirations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferri, F., & Sandino, T. (2009). The impact of shareholder activism on financial reporting and compensation: The case of employee stock options expensing. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 433–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fos, V. (2017). The disciplinary effects of proxy contests. Management Science, 63(3), 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fos, V., & Tsoutsoura, M. (2014). Shareholder democracy in play: Career consequences of proxy contests. Journal of Financial Economics, 114(2), 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gantchev, N., Gredil, O., & Jotikasthira, C. (2016). Governance under the gun: Spillover effects of hedge fund activism. Working paper: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  29. Garvey, G., & Hanka, G. (1999). Capital structure and corporate control: The effect of antitakeover statutes on firm leverage. Journal of Finance, 54, 519–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodman, T., Neamtiu, M., Shroff, N., & White, H. (2014). Management forecast quality and capital investment decisions. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 331–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hafzalla, N. (2009). Managerial incentives for discretionary disclosure: Evidence from management leveraged buyouts. Review of Accounting Studies, 14, 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Healy, P., Hutton, A., & Palepu, K. (1999). Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(3), 485–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirst, E., Koonce, L., & Venkataraman, S. (2008). Management earnings forecasts: a review and framework. The Accounting Horizons, 22(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutton, A., Miller, G., & Skinner, D. (2003). The role of supplementary statements with management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (5), 867–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim, O., & Verrecchia, R. (1994). Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2009). Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. Journal of Finance, 64, 187–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kothari, S., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 241–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71, 467–492.Google Scholar
  42. Lerman, A., & Livnat, J. (2010). The new form 8-K disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 752–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lundholm, R. (1988). Price-signal relations in the presence of correlated public and private information. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maffett, M. (2012). Financial reporting opacity and informed trading by international institutional investors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2–3), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahalanobis, P. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences, 2, 49–55.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, G. (2002). Earnings performance and discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagar, V. (1999). The role of the manager’s human capital in discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 37, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagar, V., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Discretionary disclosure and Stock-Based incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norli, O., Ostergaard, C., & Schindele, I. (2015). Liquidity and shareholder activism. Review of Financial Studies, 28, 486–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. (2000). Taking stock: Equity-based compensation and the evolution of managerial ownership. Journal of Finance, 55, 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rogers, J., Skinner, D., & Van Buskirk, A. (2009). Earnings guidance and market uncertainty. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 90–109.Google Scholar
  53. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.Google Scholar
  54. Schoenfeld, J. (2017). The effect of voluntary disclosure on stock liquidity: New evidence from index funds. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwert, W. (1981). Using financial data to measure effects of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Segal, B., & Segal, D. (2016). Are managers strategic in reporting non-earnings news? Evidence on timing and news bundling. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4), 1203–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shroff, N., Sun, A., White, H., & Zhang, W. (2013). Voluntary disclosure and information asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 securities offering reform. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 1299–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shroff, N., Verdi, R., & Yu, G. (2014). Information environment and the investment decisions of multinational corporations. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 759–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skinner, D. (1997). Earnings disclosures and stockholder lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23, 249–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Verrecchia, R. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. You, H., & Zhang, X. (2009). Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(4), 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HKUSTKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations