What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption?
- 4.1k Downloads
We investigate the effects of mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption on the comparability of financial accounting information. Using a set of alternative comparability measures, our results suggest that the overall comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption is marginal. We hypothesize that firm-level heterogeneity in IFRS compliance explains the limited comparability effect. To test this conjecture, we first hand-collect data on IFRS compliance for a sample of German and Italian firms and find that firm-, region-, and country-level incentives systematically shape IFRS compliance. We then use these compliance determinants to explain the variance in the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption and find that only firms with high compliance incentives experience substantial increases in comparability. Moreover, we document that firms from countries with tighter reporting enforcement experience larger IFRS comparability effects, and that public firms adopting IFRS become less comparable to local GAAP private firms from the same country.
KeywordsInternational accounting IFRS Comparability Compliance Reporting incentives
JEL ClassificationM41 M48 G14
We thank Lakshmanan Shivakumar (editor) and an anonymous referee for their insightful suggestions and constructive feedback. We acknowledge the helpful comments of Rashad Abdel-Khalik, Jan Barton, Sudipta Basu, Katheryn Bewley, Ulf Brüggemann, Maria Correia, Lucie Courteau, Dan Givoly, Steven Huddart, Bjørn Jørgensen, Bin Ke, Urška Kosi, Garen Markarian, Peter Pope, Karthik Ramanna, Bill Rees, Shyam Sunder, İrem Tuna, Pauline Weetman, Steven Zeff, and seminar participants at the University of Amsterdam, University of Bari, ESMT Berlin, Bocconi University, Cass Business School, University of Cologne, Edinburgh University, HEC Paris, IE Madrid, London School of Economics, University of Naples Federico II, Rotterdam School of Management as well as conference participants at the 2009 AAA International Accounting Section Mid-Year Meeting, the 2009 EAA Conference, the 2009 AAA Annual Meeting, and the 2010 Pennsylvania State University Annual Conference. We thank Katarina Wilhelm for excellent research assistance. Joachim Gassen acknowledges the financial support of the German research foundation (DFG) under project A7 of the collaborative research center SFB 649 at Humboldt University. Stefano Cascino thanks the SFB 649 for co-founding his research visit at Humboldt University.
- Alves, P., Pope, P., & Young, S. (2007). International information transfers: An analysis of European companies. Working paper, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
- Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). Role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 207–242.Google Scholar
- Beneish, M. D., Miller, B. P., & Yohn Lombardi, T. (2012). The impact of financial reporting on equity versus debt markets: Macroeconomic evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption. Working paper, Indiana University, 2012. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1403451.
- Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2013). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Working Paper, University of New South Wales and University of Western Australia, 2013. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2286029.
- Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. S. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 1085–1142.Google Scholar
- Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. S. (2013). Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences of IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 495–547.Google Scholar
- European Commission (EC). (2002). Regulation no. 1606/2002 of the European parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
- Gerschenkron, A. (1955). Notes on the rate of industrial growth in Italy, 1881–1913. Journal of Economic History, 15, 360–375.Google Scholar
- International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) Foundation. (2005). Constitution. London: IASC.Google Scholar
- Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2011). The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69, 505–527.Google Scholar
- SEC. (2010). Commission statement in support of convergence and global accounting standards. Washington, DC: SEC.Google Scholar
- SEC. (2011). Work plan for the consideration of incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the financial reporting system for U.S. Issuers—An analysis of IFRS in practice. Washington, DC: SEC.Google Scholar
- Street, D. L., & Gray, S. J. (2001). Observance of international accounting standards: Factors explaining non-compliance. ACCA research report no. 74.Google Scholar
- Wang, C. (2011). Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, 2011. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1754199.
- Wu, R., & Zhang, I. (2010). Accounting integration and comparability: Evidence from relative performance evaluation around IFRS adoption. Working paper, University of Rochester, 2010. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1650782.
- Yu, G. (2010). Accounting standards and international portfolio holdings: Analysis of cross-border holdings following mandatory adoption of IFRS. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar