The financial reporting of fair value based on managerial inputs versus market inputs: evidence from mortgage servicing rights
- 1.3k Downloads
This research examines whether the fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) based on managerial inputs (Level 3) better reflects the cash flow and risk characteristics of the underlying assets than the fair value of MSRs based on market inputs (Level 2). Using mortgage servicing fees as a proxy for the underlying cash flows, we find that the valuation multiples for MSRs based on Level 3 inputs are more positively associated with the persistence of future servicing fees compared with the fair value of MSRs based on Level 2 inputs. We also document that only the valuation multiples based on Level 3 fair values are negatively associated with proxies for risk factors. Our results suggest that, although unobservable inputs are subject to managerial discretions, managers can generate higher quality fair value estimates than market inputs due to their information advantage, especially when the market for the underlying asset is inactive.
KeywordsMortgage servicing rights Fair value Market inputs Managerial inputs FAS 157
- Barth, M. (1991). Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. The Accounting Review, 66, 433–463.Google Scholar
- Botosan, C., Carrizosa, R., & Huffman, A. (2011). Factors influencing banks’ use of level 3 valuation inputs during the financial crisis, working paper, University of Utah.Google Scholar
- Choi, B., Collins, D., & Johnson, B. (1997). Valuation implications of reliability differences: The case of nonpension postretirement obligations. The Accounting Review, 72, 351–383.Google Scholar
- Emrick, C. (2006 May). New FASB statement requires initial fair value treatment for servicing assets and liabilities: Look for increases in gain on sale revenues at mortgage companies. Moody’s Investor Services.Google Scholar
- Goh, B. W., Ng, J., & Yong, K. O. (2009). Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 during the 2008 economic crisis, working paper, MIT.Google Scholar
- Kolev, K. (2009). Do investors perceive marking-to-model as marking-to-myth? Early evidence from FAS 157 disclosure. Working Paper: New York University.Google Scholar
- Riedl, E., & Serafeim, G. (2009). Information risk and fair value: An examination of equity betas and bid-ask spreads. Working paper, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Song, J. C., Thomas, W., & Yi, H. (2010). Value relevance of FAS no. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 85, 1375–1410.Google Scholar
- Urumoglu, U. (2010). Demystifying the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. www.cunacfocouncil.org.