Review of Accounting Studies

, 16:574 | Cite as

Discussion of “intangible investment and the importance of firm-specific factors in the determination of earnings”



Brown and Kimbrough (Review of Accounting Studies, 2011, this issue) examine the effect of intangible assets on the “uniqueness” of a firm’s earnings. The paper represents an important link between the strategy literature on firm organization and the accounting literature on the drivers of firm performance. This discussion reviews the relevant strategy literature and its link to the accounting literature, discusses various aspects of Brown and Kimbrough, and explores implications of Brown and Kimbrough’s findings.


Intangibles Earnings synchronicity Competitive advantage Strategy 

JEL Classification

L22 L25 


  1. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1967). Some preliminary findings on the association between the earnings of a firm, its industry, and the economy. Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, N., & Kimbrough, M. (2011). Intangible investment and the importance of firm-specific factors in the determination of earnings. Review of Accounting Studies (this issue).Google Scholar
  5. Dickinson, V., & Sommers, G. (2010). Do firms’ competitive efforts lead to future abnormal economic rents? Working paper, University of Mississippi. Available at: Accessed April 12 2011.
  6. Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1,105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gong, G., Li, L., & Zhou, L. (2009). Earnings non-synchronicity and voluntary disclosure. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  8. King, B. (1966). Market and industry factors in stock price behavior. Journal of Business, 39, 139–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, F., Lundholm, R., & Minnis, M. (2011). The impact of competitive intensity on the profitabilty of investments and future stock returns. Working paper, The University of British Columbia. Available at: Accessed April 12 2011.
  10. Litov, L., & Zenger, T. (2010). Do investors value uniqueness in corporate strategy? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Working paper, Washington University. Available at: Accessed April 12 2011.
  11. Litov, L., Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. (2010). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Working paper, Washington University. Available at: Accessed April 12 2011.
  12. McGahan, A., & Porter, M. (2002). What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Science, 48, 834–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 215–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Penman, S. (1991). An evaluation of accounting rate-of-return. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, Spring, 233–255.Google Scholar
  15. Piotroski, J., & Roulstone, D. (2004). The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry, and firm-specific information into stock prices. The Accounting Review, 79, 1,119–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rumelt, R. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmalensee, R. (1985). Do markets differ much? American Economic Review, 75, 341–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fisher College of BusinessThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations