Discussion of: “Flattening the organization: the effect of organizational reporting structure on budgeting effectiveness”
This paper is a discussion of Hannan et al. (Rev Account Stud, 2010), wherein subordinate-participants are endowed with private information, and superior-participants can potentially affect budget requests through their ability to reject them. Their findings are of interest to research on both the design of budgeting systems and span of control. I discuss the relevance of HRT to these literatures and comment on their implementation and experimental design. Also, I offer suggestions for future research, one of which is to explicitly introduce monitoring into experiments on span of control.
KeywordsBudgeting Experimental economics Span of control Strategy method
JEL ClassificationD82 G31 L25 M40
- Arya, A., Glover, J., & Young, R. (1996). Capital budgeting in a multidivisional firm. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11(4), 519–534.Google Scholar
- Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics, 2, 227–238.Google Scholar
- Brandts, J., & Charness G. (2009). The strategy versus the direct-response method: A survey of experimental comparisons. Working paper, University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www.asr.uab.cat/asr/docs/brandts/strategy_exec.pdf.
- Coats, J., Hannan, L., Rankin, F., & Towry, K. (2008). Behavior in ultimatum games with multiple proposers. Working paper. Colorado State University. http://www.goizueta.emory.edu/faculty/KristyTowry/documents/Jebo_4_2007.pdf.
- Demski, J. (2008). Managerial uses of accounting information (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hannan, R., Rankin, F., & Towry, K. (2010). Flattening the organization: The effect of organizational reporting structure on budgeting effectiveness. Review of Accounting Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Marschak, J., & Radner, R. (1972). Economic theory of teams. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Rankin, F., Schwartz, S., & Young, R. (2008). The effect of honesty and superior authority on budget proposals. The Accounting Review, (July), 1083-1099.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S., Spires, E., Wallin, D., & Young, R. (2009a). The behavioral implications of aggregation and delay on budget approval decisions. Working paper, Ohio State University. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1495708.
- Schwartz, S., Spires, E., Wallin, D., & Young, R. (2009b). Unobservable commitment and management control: An experiment. Working paper, Ohio State. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1495230.