Advertisement

Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 808–832 | Cite as

The use of advertising activities to meet earnings benchmarks: evidence from monthly data

  • Daniel Cohen
  • Raj Mashruwala
  • Tzachi Zach
Article

Abstract

Using a unique database of monthly media advertising spending, we examine whether managers engage in real earnings management to meet quarterly financial reporting benchmarks. We extend prior literature by (1) separately analyzing advertising activities, allowing us to explore the possibility that managers could reduce or boost advertising to meet benchmarks; (2) analyzing actual activities as opposed to inferring them from reported expenses, which are also subject to accrual choices; (3) investigating the timing, within a quarter, of altered advertising spending; and (4) examining quarterly earnings benchmarks. We find that managers, on average, reduce advertising spending to avoid losses and earnings decreases. However, we also report that firms in the late stages of their life cycle increase advertising to meet earnings benchmarks. Finally, we find some evidence that firms increase advertising in the third month of a fiscal quarter and in the fourth quarter to beat prior year’s earnings.

Keywords

Real earnings management Advertising Earnings benchmarks 

JEL Classification

M41 M432 G38 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Center for Research in Economics and Strategy at the Olin Business School. We have benefited from the comments of two anonymous referees, Eli Bartov, Anne Beatty, Messod Beneish, Larry Brown, Donal Byard, Sandra Chamberlain (FARS discussant), Masako Darrough, Richard Dietrich, Nick Dopuch, Peter Easton, Richard Frankel, James Hansen, Steve Huddart, Bjorn Jorgensen, April Klein, Andy Leone, Fred Lindahl, Thomas Lys, Christina Mashruwala, Shamin Mashruwala, Brian Miller, Doron Nissim, Shail Pandit, Sugata Roychowdhury, Kristi Schneck, Ram Venkataraman, Xin Wang, Joe Weber, TJ Wong, Minlei Yei (AAA discussant), Amy Zang (CFEA discussant), Paul Zarowin, Jerry Zimmerman, participants at the 2008 FARS conference, the 2008 AAA annual meeting, the 2007 Conference of Financial Economics and Accounting, the 2007 Nick Dopuch Conference, and workshop participants at University of Arizona, Baruch College, University of Chicago, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Columbia University, Georgia State University, George Mason University, George Washington University, IDC Herzliya, INSEAD, University of Illinois at Chicago, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Maryland, University of Miami, The Ohio State University, Penn State University, Southern Methodist University, Stanford University, University of Technology Sydney, and Washington University in St. Louis.

References

  1. Accounting Principles Board. (1973). Interim Financial Reporting. APB Opinion No. 28. New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M., Banker, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs ‘sticky’? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, J., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, R. (1979). How promotion elasticities change. Journal of Advertising Research, 19, 57–62.Google Scholar
  5. Assmus, G., Farley, J., & Lehmann, D. R. (1984). How advertising affects sales: Meta-analysis of econometric results. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagwell, K. (2007). The economic analysis of advertising. In Mark Armstrong & Rob Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp. 1701–1844). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L., & Caylor, M. (2005). A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences. The Accounting Review, 80, 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruns, W., & Merchant, K. (1990). The dangerous morality of managing earnings. Management Accounting, 72, 22–25.Google Scholar
  9. Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, C. (2008). The effects of real earnings management on the firm, its competitors and subsequent reporting periods. Working paper, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  11. Darrough, M., & Rangan, S. (2005). Do insiders manipulate earnings when they sell their shares in an initial public offering? Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeGeorge, F., Patell, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 255–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1974). Reporting accounting changes in interim financial statements. Statement of financial accounting standards No. 3. Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
  15. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1977). FASB interpretation No. 18. Accounting for income taxes in interim periods. Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
  16. Foster, G. (1977). Quarterly accounting data: Time-series properties and predictive ability results. The Accounting Review, 52, 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 3–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunny, K. (2005). What are the consequences of real earnings management? Working paper, University of Colorado. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=816025.
  19. Healy, P., & Wahlen, J. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kothari, S. P. (2001). Capital market research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 105–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parker, P. M., & Gatignon, H. (1996). Order of entry, trial diffusion, and elasticity dynamics: An empirical case. Marketing Letters, 7, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parsons, L. (1975). The product life cycle and time-varying advertising elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petersen, M. (2008). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers, W. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.Google Scholar
  25. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winer, R. S. (1979). An analysis of the time-varying effects of advertising: The case of Lydia Pinkham. Journal of Business, 52, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zang, A. (2006). Evidence on the tradeoff between real manipulation and accrual manipulation. Working paper, University of Rochester. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=961293.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Fisher College of BusinessThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations