Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 87–118 | Cite as

GAAP goodwill and debt contracting efficiency: evidence from net-worth covenants

  • Richard Frankel
  • Chandra Seethamraju
  • Tzachi Zach
Article

Abstract

We study the role of goodwill in promoting contracting efficiency and the effect of SFAS 141 and 142 on this role. We provide three main results. First, when a lending agreement contains some type of minimum net-worth covenant, the probability of a tangible net-worth covenant is decreasing in the borrower’s goodwill. Second, the use of tangible net-worth covenants has increased since the promulgation of SFAS 141 and 142. Finally, covenant slack is not significantly related to the use of tangible net-worth covenants relative to net-worth covenants. These results suggest that contracting parties realize efficiency gains by permitting borrowers’ actions to be restricted by the value of GAAP goodwill. However, recent changes in GAAP have reduced the contracting usefulness of goodwill.

Keywords

Contracting efficiency Goodwill Debt covenants 

JEL Classification

M41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the comments of two anonymous referees, Jack Hughes (the editor), Jerry Zimmerman and seminar participants at Columbia University, New York University and Washington University in St. Louis.

References

  1. Aboody, D., Kasznik, R., & Williams, M. (2000). Purchase versus pooling in stock-for-stock acquisitions: Why do firms care? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29, 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers, B., Lefanowicz, C., & Robinson, J. (2002). Do firms purchase the pooling method? Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. (2006). Conservatism and debt, MIT working paper.Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2006). Accounting discretion in fair value estimates: An examination of SFAS 142 goodwill impairments. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begley, J., & Feltham, G. (1999). An examination of the relation between debt contracts and management incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billett, M., King, T., & Mayer, D. (2007). Growth opportunities and the choice of leverage, debt maturity, and covenants. Journal of Finance, 62(2), 697–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Defond, M., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenants violations and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demerjian, P. (2007). Financial ratios and credit risk: The selection of financial ratio covenants in debt contracts, working paper. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  9. Dichev, I., & Skinner, D. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1091–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Gazzar, S., & Pastena, V. (1990). Negotiated accounting rules in private financial contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry cost of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2001a). Statement of Financial Accountings Standards No. 142: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.Google Scholar
  13. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2001b). Statement of Financial Accountings Standards No. 141: Business Combinations.Google Scholar
  14. Frankel, R., & Litov, L. (2007). Financial accounting characteristics and debt covenants, working paper. Washington University.Google Scholar
  15. Galai, D., & Masulis, R. (1976). The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalay, A. (1982). Stockholder-bondholder conflict and dividend constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kieso, D., Weygandt, J., & Warfield, T. (2004). Intermediate accounting (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Leftwich, R. (1983). Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review, 63, 23–42.Google Scholar
  19. Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 34, 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petersen, M. (2005). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches, working paper. Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, C., & Warner, J. (1979). On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 117–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, C., & Watts, R. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, C. (1993). A perspective on accounting-based debt covenants violations. The Accounting Review, 68, 289–303.Google Scholar
  25. Sweeney, A. (1994). Debt covenant violations and managers accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watts, R. (2006). What has the invisible hand achieved? MIT Sloan School working paper.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, J. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of pooling-of-interests accounting: Evidence from the SEC’s restriction on share repurchases following pooling transactions. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 37, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfson, M. (1980). Discussion of the economic effects of involuntary uniformity in the financial reporting of R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Frankel
    • 1
  • Chandra Seethamraju
    • 2
  • Tzachi Zach
    • 1
  1. 1.Olin School of BusinessWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Mellon Capital ManagementSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations