Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 165–174

Lower polar ionosphere during a solar flare as revealed from radiooccultation data in satellite-to-satellite links

  • O. I. Yakovlev
  • S. S. Matyugov
  • V. A. Anufriev
Article
  • 24 Downloads

It is shown that there are typical variations in the amplitude and phase of decimetric radio waves in satellite-to-satellite links due to variations in the polar ionosphere structure. The altitude profiles of the electron number density and vertical size of the ionospheric sporadic structures in the nighttime polar regions during the period of intense solar activity in October 25 to November 09, 2003 are estimated. Correlation between the the ionosphere characteristics and the solar-wind parameters is discussed. It is noted that the effect of energetic-particle precipitation due to the influence of shock waves of the solar wind is the main factor responsible for strong variations in the nighttime polar ionosphere.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. I. Kucheryavenkov, O. I. Yakovlev, I. L. Kucheryavenkova, and L. N. Samoznaev, J. Commun. Tech. Electron., 43, No. 8, 880 (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. A. Hajj and L. I. Romans, Radio Sci., 33, No. 1, 175 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Schreiner, S. Sokolovskiy, C. Rocken, and D. Hunt, Radio Sci., 34, No. 4, 949 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Jakowski, R. Leitinger, and M. Angling, Ann. Geophys. Suppl., 47, Nos. 2–3, 1049 (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Jakowski, A. Wehrenpfennig, S. Heise, et al., First CHAMP Mission Results, Springer (2003), p. 462.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Wickert, A. G. Pavelyev, Y. A. Liou, et al., J. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, article No. L24801 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. L. Wu, C. O. Ao, G. A. Hajj, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 110, article No. A01306 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. A. Liou and A. G. Pavelyev, J. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, No. 23, article No. L231021 (2006).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. G. Pavelyev, Y. A. Liou, J. Wickert, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 112, article No. A06326 (2007).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. I. Yakovlev, V. A. Anufriev, J. Wickert, and S. S. Matyugov, J. Commun. Tech. Electron., 53, No. 2, 155 (2008).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. S. Matyugov, O. I. Yakovlev, and V. A. Anufriev, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 51, No. 3, 161 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. I. Yakovlev, J. Wickert, A. G. Pavelyev, et al., Acta Astronautica, 63, 1350 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. I. Yakovlev, S. S. Matyugov, and V. A. Anufriev, Cosmic Res., 47, No. 4 (2009) [in press].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Bilitza, Radio Sci., 36, No. 2, 207 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. S. Veselovsky, M. I. Panasyuk, S. I. Avdyushin, et al., Cosmic Res., 42, No. 5, 433 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. V. Eselevich and V. G. Eselevich, Cosmic Res., 42, No. 6, 571 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. I. Yakovlev, J. Wickert, S. S. Matyugov, and V. A. Anufriev, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 49, No. 3, 167 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Wickert, G. Beyerle, T. Schmidt, et al., First CHAMP Mission Results, Springer (2003), p. 371. 19. http://www.wdc.rl.ac.uk.
  19. 20.
    G. A. Zherebtsov, O. M. Pirog, N. M. Polekh, et al., Geomagn. Aeron., 45, No. 1, 101 (2005).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. I. Yakovlev
    • 1
  • S. S. Matyugov
    • 1
  • V. A. Anufriev
    • 1
  1. 1.V. A. Kotel’nikov Institute of Radio Engineering and ElectronicsFryazinoRussia

Personalised recommendations