The Ramanujan Journal

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 269–289 | Cite as

The generalized lucky ticket problem, perfect matchings, and closure relations satisfied by the Chebyshev and \(q\)-Hermite polynomials

Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

Consideration is given to an asymmetric ticket of length \(m+n\) in base \(\ell \). Such a ticket is said to be \((m,n)\)-lucky if the sum of the first \(m\) digits is equal to that of the last \(n\) digits. In other words, a \((m,n)\)-lucky ticket is a \(m+n\) digit number (in base \(\ell \)) of the form \(a_1a_2\cdots a_mb_1b_2\cdots b_n\) where \(a_i,b_j \in \left\{ 0,1,2,\dots ,\ell -1 \right\} \) and \(a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_m = b_1 + b_2 + \cdots + b_n\). Applying both analytical (contour integral) and combinatorial methods, we arrive at two representations for the number of \((m,n)\)-lucky tickets in base \(\ell \). Our results reduce to those in the literature, when \(m=n\) and \(\ell =10\). Furthermore, through the contour integral approach, we arrive at a non-obvious closure relation satisfied by the Chebyshev polynomials. The weighted ticket problem is also considered, and analogous results are obtained. As addressed by Ismail, Stanton, and Viennot, the generating function of the crossing numbers over perfect matchings is related to closure relations of \(q\)-Hermite polynomials. In the second part of this paper, we give corresponding contour integral representations for these closure relations, which permit us to give an alternate representation of the number of perfect matchings between sets. In the \(q=0\) limit, we obtain a representation equivalent to that of De Sainte-Catherine and Viennot for the number of Dyck words of a fixed length satisfying a set of algebraic restrictions. In order to relate the two combinatorial problems, we find an explicit correspondence between our contour formulations for each problem.

Keywords

Lucky tickets Perfect matching Chebyshev polynomials \(q\)-Hermite polynomials Contour integration methods 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 05C70 33D45 Secondary 05A15 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. E. H. Ismail for suggesting a possible connection between the lucky ticket and the perfect matching problem, as well as for many fruitful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Aliashvili, T.: Geometry and topology of proper polynomial mappings. J. Math. Sci. 160, 679–692 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Askey, R.: Linearization of the product of orthogonal polynomials. In: Gunning R.C. (ed.) Problems in Analysis, A Symposium in Honor of Salomon Bochner, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970, pp. 131–138. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 21, SIAM, Philadelphia (1975)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Askey, R.: Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Functions. In: CBMS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 21. SIAM, Philadelphia (1975)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Askey, R., Ismail, M.E.H.: A generalization of ultraspherical polynomials. In: Erdös, P. (ed.) Studies in Pure Mathematics. Birkhauser, Basel (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Médicis, A., Stanton, D., White, D.: The combinatorics of q-Charlier polynomials. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 69(1), 87–114 (1995)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Sainte-Catherine, M. , Viennot, X.G.: Combinatorial Interpretation of Integrals of Products of Hermite, Laguerre and Tchebycheff Polynomials. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1171, pp. 120–128. Springer, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foata, D., Zeilberger, D.: Laguerre polynomials, weighted derangements and positivity. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 1, 425–433 (1988)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fulmek, M.: Enumeration of permutations containing a prescribed number of occurrences of a pattern of length three. Adv. Appl. Math. 30, 607–632 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gessel, I.: Generalized rook polynomials and orthogonal polynomials. In: q-Series and Partitions, Minneapolis, MN, 1988. IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Applications, vol. 18, pp. 159–176. Springer, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ismail, M.E.H., Kasraoui, A., Zeng, J.: Separation of variables and combinatorics of linearization coefficients of orthogonal polynomials. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 120, 561–599 (2013)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ismail, M.E.H., Stanton, D., Viennot, G.: The combinatoric of \(q\)-Hermite polynomials and the Askey–Wilson integral. Eur. J. Comb. 8, 379–392 (1987)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ismail, M., Tamhankar, M.: A combinatorial approach to some positivity problems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 10, 478–485 (1979)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ismail M.: Personal communication (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khovansky, A.: Fewnomials. AMS, Providence (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, D., Zeng, J.: A combinatorial formula for the linearization coefficients of general Sheffer polynomials. Eur. J. Comb. 22, 313–332 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, D., Zeng, J.: Combinatorics of generalized Tchebycheff polynomials. Eur. J. Comb. 24, 499–509 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lando, S.K.: Lectures on Generating Functions. AMS, Providence (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mansour, T., Vainshtein, A.: Layered restrictions and Chebyshev polynomials. Ann. Comb. 5, 451–458 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mansour, T., Vainshtein, A.: Restricted permutations and Chebyshev polynomials. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 47 (2002). Article B47cGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guibert, O., Mansour, T.: Restricted 132-involutions and Chebyshev polynomials. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 48 (2002). Article B48aGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mansour, T.: Restricted 132-alternating permutations and Chebyshev polynomials. Ann. Comb. 7, 201–227 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mihailovs, A.: Lucky tickets and the Petrovsky numbers. Bachelor’s thesis, University of Latvia (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petrovsky, I., Oleynik, O.: On the topology of real algebraic curves. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 13, 389–402 (1949)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simion, R., Stanton, D.: Octabasic Laguerre polynomials and permutation statistics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 68(1–2), 297–329 (1996)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Slater, L.J.: Generalized Hypergeometric Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1966)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations