Advertisement

Strategic marketing & Austrian economics: The foundations of resource-advantage theory

  • Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D’AndreaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Contrary to popular belief, marketing was not born under management, but under economics. Issues such as markets and exchanges are at the core of both disciplines even though they are studied under different lenses. The common ground makes it possible to use one approach to analyze the other. That is the goal of this paper: to show that “Austrian economics” is helpful in understanding the key phenomena of strategic marketing. The aim is to show how business schools can adopt an Austrian approach in their economics classes to facilitate students’ understanding of market dynamics. This qualitative and exploratory study analyzes a general theory of competition, the Resource-Advantage Theory, using the Austrian concepts — action, time, and knowledge — to better understand business competition and what leads companies to achieve and maintain competitive advantages. By comparing these two theoretical frameworks, the paper analyzes, in a detailed manner, each one of the R-A Theory’s premises using ideas of the Austrian School and concludes that these ideas are helpful not only for understanding the Resource-Advantage Theory, but also Strategic Marketing as a whole and that, consequently, the Austrian approach should be taught at business schools economics courses.

Keywords

Strategic marketing Austrian school of economics Competition Competitive advantage Business competition R-A theory 

JEL classification

D21 M10 M21 M31 L22 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the Ludwig von Mises Institute for financial support and especially Joseph Salerno, Guido Hülsmann, Mark Brandly, Karl-Friedrich Israel, Patrick Newman, and the participants in the 2018 Mises Institute Summer Fellows research program for valuable comments on early drafts of this paper. Special thanks to Matthew McCaffrey, Mark Thornton, and Floy Lilley.

References

  1. Aaker, D. A., & Moorman, C. (2008). Strategic market management. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Abreu, M. P. (2014). Cataláxia. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, 2(1), 81–98.  https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2014.v2.581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, R., Barney, J. B., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2009). Heterogeneous resources and the financial crisis: Implications of strategic management theory. Strategic Organization, 7(4), 467–484.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009346790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action: A functionalist approach to marketing theory. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  5. Alderson, W. (1965). The heterogeneous market and the organized behavior system. In B. Wolliscroft, R. D. Tamilia, & S. J. Shapiro (Eds.), A twenty-first century guide to Aldersonian marketing though 2006 (pp. 217–228). Boston/Dordrecht/London: Springer/Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  6. Backhouse, R. E. (2000). Austrian economics and the mainstream: View from the boundary. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 3(2), 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-000-1002-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P. (1974). Marketing as an organized behavioral system of exchange. Journal of Marketing, 38(4), 77.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1250397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1250593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P. (2010). The evolution of marketing thought: From economic to social exchange and beyond. In P. Maclaran, M. Saren, B. Stern, & M. Tadajweski (Eds.), The Sage handbook of marketing theory (pp. 244–265). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  10. Barbieri, F. (2001). O processo de mercado na escola austríaca moderna. Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.  https://doi.org/10.11606/D.12.2001.tde-20102001-144955
  11. Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 124–188). Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc..Google Scholar
  12. Bartels, R. (1951). Influences on the development of marketing thought, 1900–1923. Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295101600101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boettke, P. J. (1996). What is wrong with neoclassical economics (and what is still wrong with Austrian economics). In F. E. Foldvary (Ed.), Beyond neoclassical economics: Heterodox approaches to economic theory. Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from http://barrybeck.com/forms/neoclassic.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
  14. Boettke, P. J. (2002). Information and knowledge: Austrian economics in search of its uniqueness. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(4), 263–274.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021190719156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bylund, P. L. (2016a). The problem of production : A new theory of the firm. Abingdon, Oxon, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bylund, P. L. (2016b). What the entrepreneurial problem reveals about Keynesian macroeconomics. In S. Kates (Ed.), What’s wrong with Keynesian economic theory? (pp. 26–43). Edward Elgar Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363740.00008
  17. Callahan, G. (2004). Economics for Real People: An introduction to the Austrian school (2nd ed.). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Cantillon, R. (2010). In M. Thornton (Ed.), An essay on economic Theory - Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en Général. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Converse, P. D. (1945). The development of the science of marketing—An exploratory survey. Journal of Marketing, 10(1), 14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224294501000103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrell, O. C., Hair, J. F., Marshall, G. W., & Tamilia, R. D. (2015). Understanding the history of marketing education to improve classroom instruction. Marketing Education Review, 25(2), 159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2015.1038963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finch, D., Nadeau, J., & O’Reilly, N. (2013). The future of marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 54–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312465091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment : A new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2015). Introduction to a forum on the judgment-based approach to entrepreneurship: Accomplishments, challenges, new directions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(03), 585–599.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2018). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs them? Academy of Management Perspectives, amp.2017.0181.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0181
  26. Garrison, R. W. (2000). Time and money. London: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203208083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 63–76.Google Scholar
  28. Harreld, D. J. (2007). An education in commerce: Transmitting business information in early modern Europe. In L. Muller & J. Ojala (Eds.), Information flows: New approaches in the historical study of business information (pp. 63–83). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/iehc2006/papers1/Harreld.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  29. Harrigan, P., & Hulbert, B. (2011). How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The new marketing DNA as a model for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 253–272.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311420234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huerta de Soto, J. (1998). The ongoing Methodenstreit of the Austrian School. Journal Des Economistes et Des Etudes Humaines, 8(1), 75–113.Google Scholar
  31. Hunt, S. D. (1997a). Competing through relationships: Grounding relationship marketing in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(5), 431–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1997.9964484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt, S. D. (1997b). Resource-advantage theory: An evolutionary theory of competitive firm behavior? Journal of Economic Issues, 31(1), 59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt, S. D. (2000). A general theory of competition: Resources, competences, productivity, economic growth. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, Inc.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220321
  34. Hunt, S. D. (2001). Commentary - a general theory of competition: Issues, answers and an invitation. European Journal of Marketing, 35(5/6), 524–548.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110388097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunt, S. D. (2002a). Foundations of marketing theory : toward a general theory of marketing. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  36. Hunt, S. D. (2002b). Resource-advantage theory and Austrian economics. In Entrepreneurship and the firm (pp. 48–272). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843767107.00019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hunt, S. D. (2011). Developing successful theories in marketing and R-A theory: Historical evolution? Other drivers? What’s important? What’s next? AMS Review, 1(2), 95–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0013-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2004). Market segmentation strategy, competitive advantage, and public policy: Grounding segmentation strategy in resource-advantage theory. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 12(1), 7–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(04)70083-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunt, S. D., & Derozier, C. (2004). The normative imperatives of business and marketing strategy: Grounding strategy in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(1), 5–22.  https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620410516709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunt, S. D., & Duhan, D. F. (2002). Competition in the third millennium: Efficiency or effectiveness? Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 97–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00144-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: Market orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 17–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunt, S. D., & Madhavaram, S. (2006). Teaching marketing strategy: Using resource-advantage theory as an integrative Theoretical Foundation. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(2), 93–105.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306288397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1252069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 107.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1251905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1997). Resource-advantage theory: A Snake swallowing its tail or a general theory of competition? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 74.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1252088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (2008). The resource-advantage theory of competition a review. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed.), Review of marketing research, Volume 1 (pp. 153–205). Armonk: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Iorio, U. J. (2011). Ação, tempo e conhecimento: A escola Austríaca. São Paulo: LVM Editora.Google Scholar
  48. Jacobson, R. (1992). The “Austrian” School of Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 782–807.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kiessling, T. S., & Glenn Richey, R. (2004). Examining the theoretical inspirations of a management guru. Management Decision, 42(10), 1269–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740410568962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Klein, J. (2002). Beyond competitive advantage. Strategic Change, 11(6), 317–327.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klein, P. G. (2008). The mundane economics of the Austrian school. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 11(3–4), 165–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-008-9045-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Klein, P. G. (2010). The Capitalist & the Entrepreneur. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  54. Kumar, V. (2015). Evolution of marketing as a discipline: What has happened and what to look out for. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.79.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lachmann, L. M. (1977). Ludwig von Mises and the market process. In Capital, expectations and the market process (pp. 181–193). Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  56. Lachmann, L. M. (1978). Capital and its structure (2nd ed.). San Fracisco: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
  57. Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The market as an economic process. New York, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Lamont, L. M., & Friedman, K. (1997). Meeting the challenges to undergraduate marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(3), 17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539701900303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewin, P. (1997). Hayekian equilibrium and change. Journal of Economic Methodology, 4(2), 245–266.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501789700000017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lewin, P., & Phelan, S. E. (1999). Firms, strategies, and resources: Contributions from austrian economics. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(2), 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-999-1009-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin, A. (2005). What we mean by individualism | Mises Institute. https://mises.org/library/what-we-mean-individualism. Accessed 4 June 2019.
  62. Mataja, V. (1884). Die Unternehmergewinn. Vienna.Google Scholar
  63. Mathews, D. (1998). Management vs. the market: An exaggerated distinction. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(3), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. May, J. C. (1762). Versuch einer allgemeinen Einleitung in die Handlungswissenschaften. Altona.Google Scholar
  65. McCaffrey, M. (2014). The political economy of The Art of War. Comparative Strategy, 33(4), 354–371.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2014.941725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McCaffrey, M. (2018). Extending the economic foundations of entrepreneurship research. European Management Review, 15(2), 191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mearman, A., Papa, A., & Webber, D. (2014). Why do students study economics? Economic Issues, 19(1), 119–147.Google Scholar
  68. Medema, S. G., & Samuels, W. J. (Eds.). (2013). The history of economic thought: A reader (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Mueller, A. P. (2018). The middle-income trap in the perspective of the Austrian capital theory. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics.  https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v0.961
  70. Murphy, R. P. (2015). Choice : Cooperation, enterprise, and human action. Oakland: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  71. Navarro, P. (2008). The MBA Core curricula of top-ranked U.S. Business Schools: A Study in Failure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 108–123.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.31413868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition (The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities). Paris & Luxemburg: OECD.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  73. Packard, M. D., Clark, B. B., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organization Science, 28(5), 840–856.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Parker, M. (2018). Shut down the business school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Economics Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pettigrew, A., & Starkey, K. (2016). From the guest editors: The legitimacy and impact of business schools—Key issues and a research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 649–664.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Los Angeles: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, (Nov-Dez), 61–78.Google Scholar
  78. Reimann, N. (2004). First-year teaching-learning environments in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 3(1), 9–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30147-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Robbins, L. (2000). In S. G. Medema & W. J. Samuels (Eds.), A history of economic thought the LSE lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rothbard, M. N. (1957). In Defense of" Extreme Apriorism. Southern Economic Journal, 314–320.Google Scholar
  81. Rothbard, M. N. (2004). Man, Economy, and State A Treatise on Economic Principles with Power and Market Government and the Economy (second). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  82. Salerno, J. T. (2008). Imperialism and the logic of war making. The Independent Review. Independent Institute.  https://doi.org/10.2307/24562243
  83. Sapori, A. (1997). La cultura del mercante medievale italiano. In R. Bordone (Ed.), Memoria del tempo e comportamento cittadino nel medioevo italiano (pp. 139–173). Torino: Scriptorium. Accessed 12 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  84. Savary, J. (1675). Le parfait négociant. Paris.Google Scholar
  85. Shaw, E. H., Jones, D. G. B., & McLean, P. A. (2011). The early schools of marketing thought. In P. Maclaran, M. Saren, B. Stern, & M. Tadajewski (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of marketing theory (pp. 27–41). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222454.n2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Snuggs, E., & Jevons, C. (2018). Reconceptualising the scholarship of marketing education–SoME futurescapes. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(2), 180–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Teklehaimanot, M. L., Ingenbleek, P. T. M., Tessema, W. K., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017). Moving toward new horizons for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1), 47–60.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316688318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Téllez-Zepeda, C. A. (2016). Escola Austríaca de Economia. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, 4(2), 317–324.  https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2016.v4.127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Varadarajan, R. (2015). Strategic marketing, marketing strategy and market strategy. AMS Review, 5(3–4), 78–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0073-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. von Hayek, F. A. (1935). Prices & production (2nd ed.). New York: Augustus M. Kelly, Publishers.Google Scholar
  91. von Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4(13), 33–54.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2548786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  93. von Mises, L. (1998). Human action: The scholar’s edition. Auburn: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  94. von Mises, L. (2008). Profit and loss. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  95. Wheeler, J. (1601). A treatise of commerce. London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escola de AdministraçãoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations