The entrepreneurship scholar plays with blocs: Collaborative innovation or collaborative judgment?
- 95 Downloads
Elert and Henrekson (2019) draw important connections between Austrian economics and the Schumpeterian literatures on “development blocs” and “the experimentally organized economy.” We appreciate their emphasis on experimentation and think that Austrian ideas on the time structure of production and the multiple specificities of capital offer complementary insights into why production is likely to be clustered, localized, and path-dependent. While we agree that Austrian economics can benefit from a “meso” level of analysis between individuals and market outcomes, we do not think their proposed Experimentally Organized Economy framework adds much to existing Austrian theory and policy analysis. We also suggest that, by focusing on Kirzner’s entrepreneurial discovery approach, Elert and Henrekson miss other Austrian approaches to entrepreneurship that can better inform their analysis.
KeywordsAustrian economics Experimentation Economic development Entrepreneurship
JEL codesB53 B15 L26 O43
- Desrochers, P., & Sautet, F. (2004). Cluster-based economic strategy, facilitation policy and the market process. Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2–3), 233–245.Google Scholar
- Elert, N., & Henrekson, M. (2019). The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics. Review of Austrian Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-019-00455-y.
- Engelhardt, L. (2012). Expansionary monetary policy and decreasing entrepreneurial quality. Quarterly journal of Austrian Economics, 15(2), 172–194.Google Scholar
- Foss, N.J., Klein, P.G., & Bjornskov, C. (2019a). Contextualizing entrepreneurship: The judgment-based view. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12428.
- Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & McCaffrey, M. (2019b). Austrian perspectives onThe structure of capital strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F.A. 1968. Competition as a discovery procedure. In Hayek, F.A. 1978. New studies in philosophy, politics, and a lot of other stuff. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. A.v. (1973). Law, legislation, and liberty, Vol.1: Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Klein, P. G., & Foss, N. J. (2010). Alertness, judgment, and Entrepeneurship. Journal of Private Enterprise, 25, 145–165.Google Scholar
- Lachmann, L. M. (1956). The structure of capital. In Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McNeel.Google Scholar
- McCaffrey, M. (2015). In P. Bylund & D. Howden (Eds.), Economic policy and entrepreneurship: Alertness or judgment? The next generation of Austrian economics: Essays in honor of Joseph T. Salerno (pp. 183–199). Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
- McCaffrey, M. 2018. William Baumol’s ‘entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. In Foundational research in entrepreneurship studies, ed. Golshan Javadian Vishal K. Gupta, Dev K. Dutta, Grace Chun Guo, Arturo E. Osorio, Banu Ozkazanc-an.. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mises, L. v. (1929). The free and prosperous commonwealth. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
- Mises, L.v. (1949). Human action. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
- Rothbard, M. N. (1970). Power and market: Government and the economy. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel.Google Scholar
- Salerno, J. T. (2012). A reformulation of Austrian business cycle theory in light of the financial crisis. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 15(1), 3–44.Google Scholar
- Stigler, G. J. (1954). The economist Plays with blocs. American Economic Review, 44, 7–14.Google Scholar
- Wicksell, K. 1898. Interest and Prices. 1962 English-language edition. New York: Augustus M Kelley.Google Scholar