Advertisement

Understanding nonprofit social enterprises: Lessons from Austrian economics

  • Stefanie HaeffeleEmail author
  • Virgil Henry Storr
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

There is a large literature on the role of nonprofit enterprises within society. This literature typically views nonprofits as either substitutes for government enterprises or complements to, and even necessary extensions of, these government efforts. While this literature has improved our understanding of the role and importance of nonprofit social enterprises, how social entrepreneurs identify opportunities, allocate resources, and adapt to changing circumstances has been relatively underexplored. Efforts to fill this gap within Austrian economics have categorized nonprofits and identified the limitations of calculation and coordination in the nonprofit sector and the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful nonprofit enterprises. This strand of literature focuses on the differences between economic calculation in for-profit enterprises and decision making in nonprofit enterprises. We argue that another meaningful aspect to determining the ability of nonprofit enterprises to coordinate plans is whether they are structured more like private enterprises and public enterprises. These insights from Austrian economics shed light on why some nonprofits are more effective than others at achieving social goals.

Keywords

Austrian economics Social learning Civil society Civic associations Nonprofits 

JEL codes

B53 L31 L33 O18 

Notes

References

  1. Acs, Z. (2013). Why philanthropy matters: How the wealthy give and what it means for economic well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aligica, P. D. (2015). Addressing limits to mainstream economic analysis of voluntary and nonprofit organizations: The Austrian alternative. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 1026–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anheier, H., & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.). (2003). The study of the nonprofits Enterprise: Theories and approaches. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Baggett, J. (2000). Habitat for humanity: Building private homes, building public religion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2009). Context matters: Institutions and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 135–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boettke, Peter J. and David Prychitko. (2004). Is an independent nonprofit sector prone to failure? Toward an Austrian School interpretation of nonprofit and voluntary action. Conversations on Philosophy, Volume 1: Conceptual Foundations: 1–40.Google Scholar
  7. Brinkerhoof, J. M., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2002). Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmen, J. G., & Fredericks, K. A. (2010). Evaluation capacity and nonprofit organizations: Is the glass half-empty or half-full? American Journal of Evaluation, 31(1), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamlee-Wright, Emily. (2004). Comment. Conversations on Philosophy, Volume 1: Conceptual Foundations: 45–51.Google Scholar
  10. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The cultural and political economy of recovery: Social learning in a post-disaster environment. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Myers, J. (2008). Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2/3), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. H. (2009). The role of social entrepreneurship in post-Katrina Community recovery. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 2(1/2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornuelle, Richard. ([1965] 2011). Reclaiming the American dream: The role of private individuals and voluntary associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Cornuelle, R. (1983). Healing America: What can be done about the continuing economic crisis. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  15. de Tocqueville, Alexis. ([1835] 2012). Democracy in America.. Edited by Eduardo Nolla, translated by James T. Schliefer. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Fox Business. (2015). Big companies without profits–Amazon, Twitter, Uber and Other big Names that Don’t Make Money. Fox Business, October 30. https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/big-companies-without-profits-amazon-twitter-uber-and-other-big-names-that-dont-make-money. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  17. Fuller, M. (1994). The theology of the hammer. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Gazley, B. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government—Nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 653–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grube, L. E., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Davies, E. G. (2017). The organizational evolution of the American National red Cross: An Austrian and Bloomington approach to organizational growth and expansion. Advances in Austrian Economics: The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy, 22, 89–105.Google Scholar
  21. Habitat for Humanity International. (2005). Annual Report: FY2005.Google Scholar
  22. Habitat for Humanity International. (2008). Annual Report: FY2008.Google Scholar
  23. Habitat for Humanity International. (2010). Annual Report: FY2010.Google Scholar
  24. Habitat for Humanity of Greater Birmingham. (2010). Annual Report: Year End June 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Habitat for Humanity of Greater Birmingham. (2012). Annual Report: Year End June 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Habitat for Humanity of Greater Birmingham. (2013). Annual Report: Year End June 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Haeffele, S., & Storr, V. H. (2019). Hierarchical management structures and housing the poor: An analysis of habitat for humanity in Birmingham, Alabama. Journal of Private Enterprise, 34(1), 15–37.Google Scholar
  28. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individuals and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hendricks, Drew. (2014). 5 successful companies that Didn’t make a Dollar for 5 years. Inc., July 7. https://www.inc.com/drew-hendricks/5-successful-companies-that-didn-8217-t-make-a-dollar-for-5-years.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  30. Husock, H. (1995). It’s time to take habitat for humanity seriously. City Journal, 5(3).Google Scholar
  31. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lavoie, D. C. (1985a). Rivalry and central planning: The socialist calculation debate reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lavoie, D. C. (1985b). National Economic Planning: What is left? Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Lavoie, D. C. (2001). The market as a procedure for discovery and conveyance of inarticulate knowledge. Comparative Economic Studies, 28, 1–19.Google Scholar
  35. Leeson, P. T., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). Weathering corruption. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lohmann, R. A. (1992). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organizations and voluntary action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. MacIndoe, H. (2013). Reinforcing the safety net: Explaining the propensity for and intensity of nonprofit-local government collaboration. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin, A. (2010). Emergent politics and the power of ideas. Studies in Emergent Order, 3, 212–245.Google Scholar
  39. Mises, Ludwig. ([1920] 1963). Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. In Collectivist economic planning, edited by F. Hayek. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.Google Scholar
  40. Mises, Ludwig. ([1949] 2007). Human action: A treatise on economics, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  41. Mises, L. (1965). Correspondence between Mises and Cornuelle. Ludwig von Mises Archives at Grove City College, (November 1).Google Scholar
  42. NPR. (2014). Red Cross 'Diverted Assets' During Storms' Aftermath To Focus On Image. NPR Special Report: The American Red Cross, October 29. http://www.npr.org/2014/10/29/359365276/on-superstorm-sandy-anniversary-red-cross-under-scrutiny. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  43. Richmond, B. J., Mook, L., & Jack, Q. (2003). Social accounting for nonprofits: Two models. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(4), 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.). (1986). The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Salamon, L. M. (1981). Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action. Public Policy, 29(3), 255–275.Google Scholar
  46. Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  49. Salamon, L. M. (2003). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  50. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skarbek, E. C. (2012). Experts and entrepreneurs. Advances in Austrian Economics: Experts and Epistemic Monopolies, 17, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skarbek, E. C. (2014). The Chicago fire of 1871: A bottom-up approach to disaster relief. Public Choice, 160(1–2), 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Skarbek, E. C., & Green, P. R. (2011). Associations and order in the cultural and political economy of recovery. Studies in Emergent Order, 4, 69–77.Google Scholar
  54. Skelcher, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships and hybridity. In E. Ferlie, E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 347–370). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, S. R., & Gronbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 221–242). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sobel, R. S., & Leeson, P. T. (2007). The use of knowledge in natural-disaster relief management. Independent Review-Oakland, 11(4), 519–532.Google Scholar
  57. Stater, K. J. (2010). How permeable is the nonprofit sector? Linking resources, demand, and government provision to the distribution of organizations across nonprofit Mission-based fields. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 674–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Storr, V. H., & Haeffele-Balch, S. (2012). Post-disaster community recovery in heterogeneous, loosely-connected communities. Review of Social Economy, 70(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. E. (2015). Community revival in the wake of disaster: Lessons in local entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson Bishop, S. (2007). Linking nonprofit capacity to effectiveness in the new public management era: The case of community action agencies. State and Local Government Review, 39(3), 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wing, K. T. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building initiatives: Seven issues for the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Youngs, B. B. (2007). The house that love built: The story of Linda & Millard Fuller, founders of habitat for humanity and the Fuller Center for Housing. Newburyport, MA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mercatus Center George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations