Advertisement

Anthropological archaeology and the Viennese students of civilization

  • Crystal A. DozierEmail author
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the parallel trajectories of anthropological archaeological and Austrian economic thought from central Europe to the Anglosphere. I note the work of Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) and Friedrich Hayek (1899–1992). Tracing the influence that similar theoretical perspectives has had on their respective fields, I particularly investigate the concept of methodological individualism within American archaeology in the twentieth century. This work therefore is a general abstract for the various points of contact between Austrian Economics and anthropological archaeology over the course of their intellectual histories.

Keywords

Archaeological history Austrian economics Economic anthropology History of thought 

JEL classification

B25 B31 Z13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Peter J. Boettke for the invitation to the 2018 Workshop on Austrian Economics at the Wirth Institute for Austrian and Central European Studies at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. That workshop inspired the present paper and the comments of all of the Workshop participated greatly enhanced this work. Thank you to all.

References

  1. Adams, W. Y. (1988). Archaeological classification: Theory versus practice. Antiquity, 62(234), 40–56.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. T. (2004). Patriarchy and its discontents: The debate on the origins of the family in the German-speaking world, 1860-1930. In S. Marchand & D. Lindenfeld (Eds.), Germany at the fin de Siècle: Culture, politics, and ideas (pp. 81–101). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, B., & Hassmann, H. (1995). Archaeology in Nazi Germany: The legacy of the Faustian Bargan. In P. L. Kohl & C. Fawcett (Eds.), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology (pp. 70–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, J. R., & Libby, W. F. (1949). Age determinations by radiocarbon content: Checks with samples of known age. Science, 110(2869), 678–680.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110.2869.678 Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, J. E., Sunell S., Bishop, K. J., Nigra, B. T., Jones, T., & Bongers, J. (2015). “Entrenched disbelief: Complex hunter-gatherers and the case for inclusive cultural evolutionary thinking.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 52p.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9246-y, 23, 448, 499.
  6. Barth, F. E. (1999). Archaeolgoical heritage of the Hallstatt region. FOREGS, 83–90.Google Scholar
  7. Benedict, R. (2005). Patterns of Culture. First mariner (Books ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  8. Bettinger, R. L., Garvey, R., & Tushingham, S. (2015). Hunter-gatherers: Archaeological and evolutionary Theory (Second ed.). Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Billig, M. S. (2000). Institutions and culture: Neo-Weberian economic anthropology. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(4), 771–788.Google Scholar
  10. Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 217–225.  https://doi.org/10.2307/278380 Google Scholar
  11. Binford, L. R. (1967). Smudge pits and Hide smoking: The use of analogy in archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity, 32(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2307/278774 Google Scholar
  12. Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference: An analytical method for archaeological Theory building using ethnographic and environmental data sets. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  13. Birner, J., & Van Zijp, R. (Eds.). (1994). Hayek, co-ordination and evolution: His legacy in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2005). Methodological individualism, spontaneous order and the research program of the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(2), 145–158.Google Scholar
  15. Chacon, R. J., & Mendoza, R. G. (2017). Feast, famine or fighting?: Multiple pathways to social complexity. Vol. 8. Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Chamlee-Wright, E. (1997). The cultural foundations of economic development: Urban female entrepreneurship in Ghana. Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The cultural and political economy of recovery: Social learning in a post-disaster environment. Vol. 12. Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Choi, S. G., & Storr, V. H. (2018). “A culture of rent seeking.” Public Choice,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0557-x.
  19. Ciote, C. S. (2012). Complexity Theory and Hayekian Natural Order. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 7(4), 459.Google Scholar
  20. Díaz-Andreu, M. (2007). A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: Nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Díaz-Andreu, M., & Cortadella, J. (2006). Success and failure: alternatives in the institutionalisation of pre- and protohistory in Spain. In J. Callmer, M. Meyer, R. Struwe, & C. Theune-Vogt (Eds.), The Beginnings of Academic Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology (1830–1930) in a European Perspective [Die Anfänge der ur- und frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie als akademisches Fach (1890–1930) im europäischen Vergleich], Berliner Archaologische Forschungen 2 (pp. 295–306). Berlin: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  22. Dozier, C. A. (2017). The origins of entrepreneurship and the market process: An archaeological assessment of competitive feasting, trade, and social cooperation. In P. J. Boettke, V. H. Storr, & C. J. Coyne (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies of the market order: New applications of market process Theory (pp. 113–137). London: Rowman and Littlefield International Limited.Google Scholar
  23. Dozier, C. A. (2018a). A Hayekian Perspective on the Domestication of Maize. In P. J. Boettke, V. H. Storr, & J. Lemke (Eds.), Explorign the Political Economy and Social Philosophy of F.A. Hayek, Economy, .Polity, and Society (pp. 215–233). New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  24. Dozier, C. A. (2018b). “Evidence of feasting in the Southern Plains: Maintenance and reinforcement of the Toyah social field, 1250–1650 AD.” Plains Anthropologist, September, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00320447.2018.1502963.
  25. Engels, F., & Leacock, E. B. (1972). The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. New York: International Publishers [1972, c1942]. http://proxy.wichita.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01463a&AN=wsu.287882&site=eds-live.
  26. Ezzamel, M., & Hoskin, K. (2002). Retheorizing accounting, writing and money with evidence from Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 333–367.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2001.0500 Google Scholar
  27. Fogelin, L. (2007). Inference to the best explanation: A common and effective form of archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity, 72(4), 603–625.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25470436 Google Scholar
  28. Fowler, D. D. (1987). Uses of the past: Archaeology in the Service of the State. American Antiquity, 52(2), 229–248.Google Scholar
  29. Frick, W. (1934). The teaching of history and prehistory in Germany. Nature, 133(3356), 298–299.Google Scholar
  30. Fritz, J. M., & Plog, F. T. (1970). The nature of archaeological explanation. American Antiquity, 35(4), 405–412.  https://doi.org/10.2307/278113 Google Scholar
  31. Fuller, D. Q., Allaby, R. G., & Stevens, C. (2010). Domestication as innovation: The entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops. World Archaeology, 42(1), 13–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903429680 Google Scholar
  32. Graeber, D. (2014). Debt- updated and expanded: The first 5,000 years. Brooklyn: Melville House.Google Scholar
  33. Haselgrove, C., & Krmnicek, S. (2012). The archaeology of money. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 235–250.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145716 Google Scholar
  34. Hatch, E. (1973). Objectivity and subjectivity in the study of human societies. In A. R. Radcliffe-Brown & E. E. Evans-Prichard (Eds.), Theories of man and culture (pp. 214–271). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hayden, B. (1995). A New Overview of Domestication. In Last Hunters, First Farmers: New Perspectives on the Prehistoric Transition to Agriculture, School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series (1st ed., pp. 273–299). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hayden, B. (1998). Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428415 Google Scholar
  37. Hayden, B., & Adams, R. (2004). Ritual structures in Transegalitarian communities. In W. C. Prentiss & I. Kuijt (Eds.), Complex hunter-gatherers: Evolution and Organization of Prehistoric Communities on the plateau of northwestern North America (pp. 84–102). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hayek, F. A. (2014a). “Degrees of Explanation.” In The Market and Other Orders, 195–212. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hayek, F. A. (2014b). “Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct: The Interplay between Rules of Individual Conduct and the Social Order of Actions.” In The Market and Other Orders, 257–77. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hayek, F. A. (2014c). “The Results of Human Action But Not of Human Design.” In The Market and Other Orders, 293–303. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hayek, F. A. (2014d). “The Theory of Complex Phenomena.” In The Market and Other Orders, 257–77. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hegmon, M. (2003). Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and Theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity, 68(2), 213–243.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3557078 Google Scholar
  43. Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity, 56(1), 7–18.  https://doi.org/10.2307/280968 Google Scholar
  44. Hodder, I. (2003). “The past as passion and play.” In Archaeology Beyond Dialogue, by Ian Hodder, 11–22. University of Utah Press: Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  45. Hodson, F. R. (1977). Quantifying Hallstatt: Some initial results. American Antiquity, 42(3), 394–412.  https://doi.org/10.2307/279064 Google Scholar
  46. Hudson, M. (2004). The archaeology of money: Debt versus barter theories of Money’s origins. In L. Randall Wray (Ed.), Credit and state theories of money. The contributions of A. Mitchell Innes (pp. 99–127). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar https://books.google.com.ezproxy.library.tamu.edu/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qh1KLhjMqIoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA99&dq=archaeology+money&ots=-S6kI3Dxq4&sig=7TRlIYzkdbuLk5tZ6p_MtWCB4fY#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  47. John, A., & Storr, V. H. (2013). Ethnicity and self-employment in Trinidad and Tobago: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 18(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, L. (1972). Problems in ‘Avant-Garde’ archaeology. American Anthropologist, 74(3), 366–377.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00080 Google Scholar
  49. Kilpatrick, H. E. (2001). Complexity, spontaneous order, and Friedrich Hayek: Are spontaneous order and complexity essentially the same thing? Complexity, 6(4), 16–20.Google Scholar
  50. Kirzner, I. M. (2001). Ludwig von Mises: The Man and His Economics. Library of modern thinkers. Wilmington: ISI Books.Google Scholar
  51. Kistler, L., Yoshi Maezumi, S., de Souza, J. G., Przelomska, N. A. S., Costa, F. M., Smith, O., et al. (2018). Multiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science, 362(6420), 1309–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0207
  52. Kossack, G. (1992). Prehistoric archaeology in Germany: Its history and current situation. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 25(2), 73–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1992.9965547 Google Scholar
  53. Kromer, K. (1959). Das Gräberfeld von Hallstatt. Florence: Sansoi.Google Scholar
  54. Lavoie, D. (2005). Economics and hermeneutics. Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Lavoie, D., & Chamlee-Wright, E. (2000). Culture and Enterprise: The development, representation and morality of business. Routledge studies in the modern world economy 26. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Leone, M. P. (1972). Issues in anthropological archaeology. Contemporary Archaeology, 14–27.Google Scholar
  57. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lubbock, J. (1913). Prehistoric times as illustrated by ancient remains and the manners and customs of modern savages (7th ed.). New York: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
  59. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
  60. Martinez, M. (2018). Explaining Culture in Hayek’s Cultural Evolution. In P. J. Boettke, V. H. Storr, & J. Lemke (Eds.), Explorign the Political Economy and Social Philosophy of F.A. Hayek, Economy, Polity, and Society (pp. 195–214). New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  61. Mauss, M. (1969). The gift : Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Translated by Ian Cunnison. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
  62. McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics Can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Meskell, L. (2001). Archaeologies of identity. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Archaeological Theory Today (pp. 187–213). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  64. Mises, L. (2005). In B. B. Greaves (Ed.), Theory and history: An interpretation of social and economic evolution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mises-theory-and-history-an-interpretation-of-social-and-economic-evolution-lf-ed. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  65. Mises, L. (2007). Human action: A treatise on economics. The liberty fund library of the works of Ludwig von Mises. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
  66. Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society; or, researches in the lines of human Progress from savagery, through barbarism to civilization. London: H. Holt.Google Scholar
  67. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  68. O’Brien, M. J. (Ed.). (1996). Evolutionary Archaeology. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  69. O’Brien, M. J., Lee Lyman, R., & Leonard, R. D. (1998). Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity, 63(3), 485–498.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2694632 Google Scholar
  70. Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.Google Scholar
  71. Raab, L. M., & Goodyear, A. C. (1984). Middle-range Theory in archaeology: A critical review of origins and applications. American Antiquity, 49(2), 255–268.  https://doi.org/10.2307/280018 Google Scholar
  72. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  74. Sahlins, M. (1998). The original affluent society (pp. 5–41). Limited Wants, Unlimited Means: A Reader on Hunter-Gatherer Economics and the Environment.Google Scholar
  75. Sidky, H. (2004a). “Bronislaw Malinowski, functionalism, and modern anthropology.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 164–82. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  76. Sidky, H. (2004b). “Cultural evolution returns: Leslie White and Julian Steward.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 200–244. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  77. Sidky, H. (2004c). “French structuralism: The anthropology of Claude Levi-Strauss.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 245–76. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  78. Sidky, H. (2004d). “Historical particularism: The anthropology of Franz boas and the demise of Theory.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 112–30. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  79. Sidky, H. (2004e). “Lewis Henry Morgan and the evolution of society.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 60–81. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  80. Sidky, H. (2004f). “Scientific, materialistic, and Marxist anthropology.” In Perspectives on culture: A critical introduction to Theory in cultural anthropology, 334–93. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  81. Sklenár, K. (1983). Archaeology in Central Europe: The first 500 years. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Smalley, J., & Blake, M. (2003). Sweet Beginnings. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 675–703.Google Scholar
  83. Smith, A. (1982). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, II, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc..Google Scholar
  84. Smith, M. E., Feinman, G. M., Drennan, R. D., Earle, T., & Morris, I. (2012). Archaeology as a social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(20), 7617–7621.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201714109 Google Scholar
  85. Steward, J. H. (1949). Cultural causality and the law: A trial Forumulation of the development Nof early civilizations. American Anthropologist, 51(1), 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1949.51.1.02a00020 Google Scholar
  86. Steward, J. H. (1972). Theory of culture change: The methodology of multilinear evolution. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  87. Steward, J. H. (1986). Levels of sociocultural integration: An operational concept. Journal of Anthropological Research, 42(3), 337–353.  https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.42.3.3630038 Google Scholar
  88. Storr, V. H. (2008). The market as a social space: On the meaningful extra-economic conversations that can occur in markets. The Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 135–150.Google Scholar
  89. Storr, V. H. (2010). The social construction of the market. Society, 47(3), 200–206.Google Scholar
  90. Thomas, D. H. (1978). The awful truth about statistics in archaeology. American Antiquity, 43(2), 231–244.  https://doi.org/10.2307/279247 Google Scholar
  91. Trigger, B. G. (1989). A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Trnka, G., & Taylor, T. (2013). A look at the region: Institute of Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology, University of Vienna. Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica, 4(1), 117–122.Google Scholar
  93. Turek, J. (2018). Archaeo-propaganda: The history of political engagement in archaeology in Central Europe. Archaeologies, 14(1), 142–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-018-9340-3 Google Scholar
  94. VanPool, C. S., & VanPool, T. L. (1999). The scientific nature of Postprocessualism. American Antiquity, 64(1), 33–53.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2694344 Google Scholar
  95. Wailes, B., & Zoll, A. L. (1995). Civilization, barbarism, and nationalism in European archaeology. In P. L. Kohl & C. Fawcett (Eds.), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology (pp. 21–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wandsnider, L. A. (1999). Late prehistoric high plans foragers: Starving nomads, affluent foragers? Great Plains Research, 9(1), 9–39.Google Scholar
  97. Weber, M. (2017). Methodology of social sciences. Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Weber, M., & Frank, R. I. (1976). The agrarian sociology of ancient civilizations. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  99. White, L. A. (1943). Energy and the evolution of culture. American Anthropologist, 45(3), 335–356.Google Scholar
  100. White, L. A. (2016). The evolution of culture: The development of civilization to the fall of Rome. Routledge.Google Scholar
  101. Willey, G. R., & Phillips, P. (1958). Method and Theory in American archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Chicago.Google Scholar
  102. Zeder, M. A. (2008). Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(33), 11597–11604.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801317105 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations