Advertisement

Austrian themes and the Cambridge capital theory controversies

  • J. Barkley RosserJrEmail author
Article

Abstract

While Austrian economists and their models were only indirectly involved in the Cambridge capital theory controversies that came to a dramatic head in 1966, certain ideas argued for by the Cambridge, UK side were prefigured in some work by Austrian economists, especially F.A. Hayek in his 1941, The Pure Theory of Capital, which he wote largely as a result of earlier debates with both Sraffa and Keynes. This paper recounts the roots of the capital theory debates coming out of the nineteenth century, the arguments among Keynes, Sraffa, and Hayek, Hayek’s analysis that undermined traditional Austrian views of capital, the Cambridge controversies themselves, and then how various groups followed up in the aftermath, including neoclassicals, neo-Ricardians and Post Keynesians, and various groups of Austrians, who were themselves slow to recognize the full implications of Hayek’s work and its relation to the Cambridge capital theory controversies. A final point is that among both those following Sraffa and Joan Robinson more as well as those following Hayek more, some have seen the issues leading to broader complexity approaches to capital theory and economic dynamics.

Keywords

Capital theory Reswitching Capital reversal Roundaboutness Heterogeneous capital Complexity 

JEL classification

B24 B25 E12 E14 

References

  1. Albin, P. S. (1975). Reswitching: An empirical observation, a theoretical note, and an environmental conjecture. Kyklos, 28, 149–153.Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, G. B. (2008). Paradoxical consumption behavior when economic activity has environmental effects. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 529–546.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, C. J. (1975). Capital theory and the distribution of income. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Bowles, S., Kirman, A., & Sethi, R. (2017). Retrospectives: Friedrich Hayek and the market algorithm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 215–230.Google Scholar
  5. Burmeister, E., & van Long, N. (1977). On some unresolved questions in capital theory: An application of Samuelson’s correspondence principle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 289–314.Google Scholar
  6. Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s challenge: An intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carvalho, F. (1983-84). Time in Shacklean and Sraffian economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6, 265–280.Google Scholar
  8. Champernowne, D. G. (1953-54). The production function and the theory of capital: A comment. Review of Economic Studies, 21, 289–318.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, J. B. (1891). Distribution as determined by a law of rent. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5, 289–318.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, A. J., & Harcourt, G. C. (2003). Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 199–214.Google Scholar
  11. Cowen, T. (1983). The rate of return. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5, 608–617.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, P. A. (1978). Money and the real world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Davison, P. A. (1982-83). Rational expectations: A fallacious foundation for crucial decision-making processes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5, 289–318.Google Scholar
  14. Dvoskin, A., & Petri, F. (2017). Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching. Metroeconomica, 68, 625–659.Google Scholar
  15. Eichner, A. S. (1978). A guide to post-Keynesian economics. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Garegnani, P. (1966). Switching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 554–567.Google Scholar
  18. Garegnani, P. (1970). Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 37, 407–436.Google Scholar
  19. Garegnani, P. (1978). Notes on consumption, investment, and effective demand I. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3, 63–82.Google Scholar
  20. Garrison, R. W. (2001). Time and money: The macroeconomics of capital structures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Garrison, R. W. (2006). Reflections on reswitching and roundaboutness. In R. Koppl (Ed.), Money and markets: Essays in honor of Leland B. Yeager (pp. 186–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Gehrke, C., & Kurz, H. D. (2006). Sraffa and von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the classical theory of value and distribution. History of Political Economy, 38, 98–149.Google Scholar
  23. Goodwin, R. M. (1951). The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles. Econometrica, 19(1), 17.Google Scholar
  24. Hahn, F. H. (1984). Equilibrium and macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Han, Z., & Schefold, B. (2006). An empirical investigation of paradoxes: Reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 737–765.Google Scholar
  26. Harcourt, G. C. (1969). Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Journal of Economic Literature, 7, 369–400.Google Scholar
  27. Harcourt, G. C. (1972). Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harper, D. A., & Endres, A. M. (2010). Capital as a layer cake: A systems approach to capital and its multi-level structure. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 74, 30–41.Google Scholar
  29. Harper, D. A., & Endres, A. M. (2012). The anatomy of emergence with a focus upon capital formation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 352–367.Google Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1931a). Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J.M. Keynes, part I. Economica, 11, 270–295.Google Scholar
  31. Hayek, F.A. (1931b). Prices and production. London: Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
  32. Hayek, F. A. (1932). Money and capital: A reply. Economic Journal, 42, 237–249.Google Scholar
  33. Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4, 33–54.Google Scholar
  34. Hayek, F. A. (1941). The pure theory of capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hayek, F.A. (1952).The sensory order: An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Hayek, F.A. (1967). The theory of complex phenomena, in Studies in philosophy, politics, and economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 22–47.Google Scholar
  38. Hicks, J.R. (1977). Economic perspectives: Further essays on money and growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Holt, R. P. F., & Pressman, S. (2001). A new guide to post Keynesian economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Horwitz, S. G. (2008). Analogous models of complexity: The Austrian theory of capital and Hayek’s theory of cognition as adaptive classifying systems. Advances in Austrian Economics, 11, 143–166.Google Scholar
  41. Horwitz, S. G. (2011). Contrasting concepts of capital: Another look at the Hayek-Keynes debate. Journal of Private Enterprise, 27, 9–27.Google Scholar
  42. Jevons, W. S. (1866). Brief account of a general mathematical theory of political economy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 29, 287–297.Google Scholar
  43. Kaldor, N. (1940). A model of the trade cycle. Economic Journal, 50, 78–92.Google Scholar
  44. Keynes, J. M. (1930). A treatise on money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Kirzner, I. M. (1966). An essay on capital. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  47. Knight, F. M. (1936). The quantity of capital and the rate of interest. Journal of Political Economy, 44, 433–463.Google Scholar
  48. Koppl, R. (2009). Complexity in Austrian economics. In J. B. Rosser Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of complexity research (pp. 393–408). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Koppl, R. (2014). From crisis to confidence: Macroeconomics after the crash. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  50. Koppl, R., & Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2002). All that I have to say has already crossed your mind. Metroeconomica, 53, 339–360.Google Scholar
  51. Kurz, H. D. (2013). Sraffa, Keynes, and post-Keynesianism. In G. C. Harcourt & P. Kreisler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of post-Keynesian economics, volume 1: Theory and origins (pp. 74–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. (1995). Theory of production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lachmann, L. M. (1956). Capital and its structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews, and McMeel.Google Scholar
  54. Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The market as an economic process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Lavoie, D. (1989). Economic chaos or spontaneous order? Implications for political economy of the new view of science. Cato Journal, 8, 613–635.Google Scholar
  56. Levhari, D. (1965). A nonsubstitution theorem and the switching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79, 98–105.Google Scholar
  57. Lewin, P. (1999). Capital in disequilibrium: The role of capital in a changing world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Lewin, P. (2014). Hayek and Lachmann. In R. W. Garrison & N. Barry (Eds.), (pp. 165–194). Cheltenham: Elgar companion to Hayekian economics.Google Scholar
  59. Lewin, P., & Cachanasky, N. (2018). Value and capital: Austrian capital theory, retrospect and prospect. Review of Austrian Economics, 31, 1–28.Google Scholar
  60. Lewis, P. (2012). Emergent properties in the work of Friedrich Hayek. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 368–378.Google Scholar
  61. Lewis, P., & Runde, J. (2007). Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 167–186.Google Scholar
  62. Macaulay, F. B. (1938). The movement of interest rates, bond yields and stock prices in the United States since 1856. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
  63. Menger, C. (1888). Zur theorie des kapitals. Jahrbuch für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 1–49.Google Scholar
  64. Morishima, M. (1966). Refutation of the nonsubstitution theorem. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 520–525.Google Scholar
  65. Pasinetti, L. (1966). Paradoxes in capital theory: A symposium: Changes in the rate of profit and switches of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 503–517.Google Scholar
  66. Pasinetti, L. (1969). Switches of technique and the ‘rate of return’ in capital theory. Economic Journal, 79, 503–531.Google Scholar
  67. Pasinetti, L. (1981). Structural change and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Pasinetti, L. (1993). Structural economic dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Petri, F. (2016). Capital theory, in Faccarello, G. and Kurz, H.D (eds), History of economic analysis, volume III: developments in major fields of economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 40–69.Google Scholar
  70. Prince, R., & Rosser, J. B. Jr. (1985). Some implications of delayed environmental costs for benefit-cost analysis: A study of reswitching in the western coal lands. Growth and Change, 16, 18–25.Google Scholar
  71. Robinson, J.V. (1953-54). The production function and the theory of capital, Review of Economic Studies, 21, 81=106.Google Scholar
  72. Robinson, J. V. (1956). The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, J. V. (1975). The unimportance of reswitching. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89, 32–39.Google Scholar
  74. Rosser, J. B. Jr. (1978). Continuity and capital-reversal: Comment. Economic Inquiry, 16, 143–146.Google Scholar
  75. Rosser, J. B. Jr. (1983). Reswitching as a cusp catastrophe. Journal of Economic Theory, 31, 182–193.Google Scholar
  76. Rosser, J.B., Jr. (1991). From catastrophe to chaos: A general theory of economic discontinuities. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  77. Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2006). Complex dynamics and post Keynesian economics. In M. Setterfield (Ed.), Complexity, endogenous money and macroeconomics: Essays in honour of Basil J. Moore (pp. 74–98). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  78. Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2012). Emergence and complexity in Austrian economics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81, 122–128.Google Scholar
  79. Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2015). Complexity and Austrian economics. In P. J. Boettke & C. J. Coyne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Austrian economics (pp. 594–611). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Samuelson, P. A. (1962). Parable and realism in capital theory: The surrogate production function. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 193–206.Google Scholar
  81. Samuelson, P. A. (1966). A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 568–583.Google Scholar
  82. Senior, N.W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. London: W. Clowes & Sons.Google Scholar
  83. Shackle, G. L. S. (1967). The years of high theory: Invention and tradition in economic thought, 1926–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics: A critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Solow, R. M. (1955-56). The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 101–106.Google Scholar
  86. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.Google Scholar
  87. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.Google Scholar
  88. Solow, R. M. (1962). Capital theory and the rate of return. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  89. Sraffa, P. (1932a). Dr. Hayek on money and capital. Economic Journal, 42, 42–53.Google Scholar
  90. Sraffa, P. (1932b). A rejoinder. Economic Journal, 42, 249–251.Google Scholar
  91. Sraffa, P. (1936). Letter to Joan Robinson. October 1936. Archives: King’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  92. Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Steedman, I. (1977). Marx after Sraffa. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  94. Steedman, I. (1994). The pure theory of capital of F.A. Hayek. In M. Colonna, H. Hagemann, & O. Hamouda (Eds.), Capitalism, socialism and knowledge. The economics of F.A. Hayek, vol. II (pp. 3–25). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  95. Steele, G. R. (2014). Hayek’s pure theory of capital. In R. W. Garrison & N. Barry (Eds.), Elgar companion to Hayekian economics (pp. 71–93). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  96. Vaughn, K. I. (1999). Hayek’s thought and market order as an instance of the theory of complex adaptive systems. Journal des économistes et des études humaines, 9, 241–246.Google Scholar
  97. Veblen, T. (1908). Professor Clark’s economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 22, 147–195.Google Scholar
  98. von Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1889). Positive theorie des kapitales. Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
  99. von Bortkiewicz, L. (1906–07). Wertrechnung und preisrechnung im Marxschen system, Archhiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 23, 1–50; 25, 10–51, 455–488.Google Scholar
  100. von Mises, L. (1912). Theorie des geldes und der umlaufsmittel. Munich: Verlag von. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  101. Vriend, N. J. (2002). Was Hayek an ace? Southern Economic Journal, 68, 811–840.Google Scholar
  102. Wicksell, G.K. (1898). Geldzins und güterpreise: eine studie über die den tauschwert des geldes bestimenden uraschen. Heidelberg: Heidelberg Universitatbibliothek.Google Scholar
  103. Wicksell, G. K. (1911). Föreläsninger: nationalekonomi: I. Lund: Berlingska.Google Scholar
  104. Yeager, L. B. (1976). Toward understanding some paradoxes in capital theory. Economic Inquiry, 14, 313–346.Google Scholar
  105. Yeager, L. B., & Burmeister, E. (1978). Continuity and capital-reversal: Reply. Economic Inquiry, 16, 147–149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations