Bitcoin and entrepreneurship: breaking the network effect
This paper explores the question of whether the market process is capable of bringing about a spontaneous monetary switch to a new currency in the presence of strong network effects of the incumbent currency as well as the absence of contingencies such as extreme inflation or political instability. It does so by examining current happenings around Bitcoin. It finds that two mechanisms stand out: the coordinating efforts of the profit-maximizing entrepreneur as well as the ability to use the old and the new currency simultaneously. Specifically, it finds that marginal decisions made by rational agents merely seeking to maximize net private benefit irrespective of the network effect, be it entrepreneurs or users of the new currency, are capable of setting in motion a switch to a new currency. Whether or not these mechanisms play out fully in the case of Bitcoin still remains to be seen.
KeywordsBitcoin Network effects Entrepreneurship Market process Institutional change
The authors would like to thank Thomas Hogan, GP Manish and attendees of APEE conference 2014 for helpful comments and suggestions.
- Antonopoulos, A. M. (2014). Mastering bitcoin. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
- David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.Google Scholar
- David, P. A. (1986). Understanding the economics of QWERTY: the necessity of history. In W. N. Parker (Ed.), Economic history and the modern economist. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Dowd, K. (2014). New Private Monies: A Bit-Part Player? (Vol. Vol. 174). London: Hobart Paper.Google Scholar
- Dowd, K., & Hutchinson, M. (2015). Bitcoin will bite the dust. Cato Journal, 35(2), 357–382.Google Scholar
- Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.Google Scholar
- Klein, P., & Selgin, G. (2000). Menger’s Theory of Money: Some Experimental Evidence. In J. Smithin (Ed.),What is Money? (pp. 217–34). London: Routledge. Google Scholar
- Lewin, Peter. (2001). The market process and the economics of QWERTY: two views. Review of Austrian Economics Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995a). Are Network Externalities a New Source of Market Failure? Research in Law and Economics, 17, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995b). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205–226.Google Scholar
- Lo, S., & Wang, C. (2014). Bitcoin as Money? (Vol. No. 14–4). Boston: Current Policy Perspectives.Google Scholar
- Luther, W. J. (2015). Cryptocurrencies, network effects, and switching costs. Contemporary Economic Policy Google Scholar
- Luther, W. J., & Olson, J. (2015). Bitcoin is memory. Journal of Prices & Markets, 3(3), 22–33.Google Scholar
- Nakamoto, S. (2010). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. www.bitcoin.org.
- White, L. H. (2015). The market for cryptocurrencies. Cato Journal, 35(2), 383–402.Google Scholar