Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 271–277 | Cite as

Monetary equilibrium and price stickiness: A rejoinder

  • Philipp Bagus
  • David Howden
Article

Abstract

Luther and Salter argue for a regime where aggregate demand is restored by an increase in the money supply in response to an increase in the demand for money. They claim that, 1) monetary equilibrium policy prescriptions do not necessarily rely on sticky prices, 2) Cantillon effects can be neglected without consequence, 3) wealth redistributions from monetary policy are unimportant, 4) monetary disequilibrium theorists strive for a stable price level, 5) fewer price adjustments are necessary in their proposed regime than in ours, 6) savings and saving are equivalent, 7) changes in the composition of savings do not alter time preference, and, 8) in their proposed regime economic calculation is easier than in a 100 % reserve system. All these claims are false. They furthermore misconstrue us as preferring negative quantity adjustments to positive price adjustments. This too is false.

Keywords

Sticky prices Non-neutral money Monetary equilibrium Free banking 

JEL Classification

E52 E58 

References

  1. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2010a). Fractional reserve free banking: Some Qibbles. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 13(4), 29–55.Google Scholar
  2. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2010b). The term structure of savings, the yeild curve, and maturity mismatching. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 13(3), 64–85.Google Scholar
  3. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2011a). Monetary equilibrium and price stickiness: Causes, consequences and remedies. Review of Austrian Economics, 24(4), 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2011b). Unanswered quibbles with fractional reserve free banking. Libertarian Papers, 3(18), 1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2012). Still unanswered quibbles with fractional reserve free banking. Review of Austrian Economics, 25(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howden, D. (2010). Knowledge shifts and the business cycle: When boom turns to bust. Review of Austrian Economics, 23(2), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hutt, W. H. (1977). The theory of idle resources (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  8. Rotemberg, J. J. (1982). Sticky prices in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1187–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rothbard, M. N. (1962). 2004 Man, Economy and State. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Salerno, J. T. (2012). A reforumlation of Austrian business cycle theory in light of the financial crisis. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 15(1), 3–44.Google Scholar
  11. Selgin, G. (1988). The theory of fre banking: Money supply under competitive note issue. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Selgin, G. (1997). Less than zero: The case for a falling price level in a growing economy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  13. von Mises, L. (1949). Human action—A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  14. von Mises, L. (1928). 2002 “Monetary Stabilization and Cyclical Policy”. In B. B. Greaves Jr. & P. L. Greaves Jr. (Eds.), On the manipulation of money and credit, (trans. and eds.) (pp. 63–179). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Yeager, L. B. (1994). Tautologies in economics and the natural sciences. Eastern Economic Journal, 20(2), 157–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Economics IUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business and EconomicsSt. Louis University – Madrid CampusMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations