The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 63–75 | Cite as

Comparative political economy when anarchism is on the table

  • Daniel J. D’Amico


Scott’s (2009) research on stateless Southeast Asia describes behavioral patterns amidst indigenous peoples that parallel certain contemporary social phenomena, especially, prohibition and military occupation. Unintended consequences caused by government are continuously interpreted to reaffirm the rationale for interventionism. Governments’ role in social processes involving violence is presumed necessary and sufficient. As a result of conceptual biases, non-governmental processes such as markets and civil society are ignored as sources for potential solutions to complex social problems. Comparative political economy should take more seriously models developed by the tradition of constitutional political economy and classical liberalism wherein the state is recognized as a significant threat to social order.


Statelessness Political Economy Prohibition Occupation Terrorism 


N15 H11 Z13 K42 


  1. Alchian, A., & Allen, W. (1964). University Economics. California: Wadsworth Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, F. (2001). Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754–1766. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bator, F. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boettke, P. (2005). Anarchism as a progressive research program in political economy. In E. Stringham (Ed.), Anarchy, State and Public Choice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. (2011a). “An anarchists’s reflection on the political economy of everyday life.” The Review of Austrian Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. (2011b). “Anarchism and austrian economics.” New Perspectives on Political Economy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Boettke, P., & Leeson, P. (2004). Liberalism, socialism and robust political economy. Journal of Markets & Morality, 7(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
  11. Boettke, P., & Prychitko, D. (1995). The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Buchanan, J. (1973). “A defense of organized crime?” In S. Rottenberg (ed.), Economics of crime and punishment. American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, J. (1990). The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calhoun, G. (1927). The growth of criminal law in Ancient Greece. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coase, R. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, D. (1995). Law, Violence, and Community in Classical Athens. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowen, T. (1988). The Theory of Market Failure: A Critical Examination. Fairfax: George Mason University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2004). Market Failure or Success: The New Debate. Oakland: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Coyne, C. (2007). After War: The Political Economy of Exporting Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. D’Amico, D. J. (2008). Tattoo prohibition behind bars: The case for repeal. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 23(2), 113–134.Google Scholar
  21. D’Amico, D. J. (2010). The prison in economics: Private and public incarceration in Ancient Greece. Public Choice, 145(3–4), 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Tocqueville, A. (1840 [2011]). Democracy in America Vol. II. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  23. Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterly, W. (2007). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Gambetta, D. (1996). The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gambetta, D. (2011). Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gifford, A. (1999). The unintended consequences of regulating addictive substances. The Cato Journal, 19(2), 301–311.Google Scholar
  28. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2006). Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  31. Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hayek, F. A. (1978). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Iannaccone, L. (2006). The market for martyrs. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2(4).Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, C. (2004). Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire. New York: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  35. Kaminski, M. (2004). Games Prisoners Play: The Tragicomic Worlds of Polish Prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kirzner, I. (1997). “How Markets Work: Disequilibrium, Entrepreneurship and Discovery”, IEA Hobart Paper 133. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  37. Leeson, P. (2007). Better off stateless: Somalia before and after government collapse. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leeson, P. (2009). The calculus of piratical consent: The myth of the myth of social contract. Public Choice, 139(3–4), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leeson, P. (2010). Calculus of piratical consent: The myth of the myth of social contract. Public Choice, 139(3–4), 443–459.Google Scholar
  40. Leeson, P. (unpublished). “Ordeals,” Working Paper. Available at:
  41. Leeson, P., & Boettke, P. (2009). Two-tiered entrepreneurship and economic development. International Review of Law and Economics, 29, 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leeson, P., & Skarbek, D. (2010). Criminal constitutions. Global Crime, 11(3), 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levitt, S. (1998). Guns, violence and the efficiency of illegal markets. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 88(2), 463–467.Google Scholar
  44. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1974). The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  45. MacDowell, D. (1978). The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. MacKenzie, D. W. (2008). The use of knowledge about society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3–4), 678–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, A. (2009). The Use of Knowledge in Comparative Economics. Fairfax: George Mason University Dissertation.Google Scholar
  48. Meadowcroft, J. (Ed.). (2008). Prohibitions. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  49. Medema, S. (2007). The hesitant hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the evolution of the theory of market failure. History of Political Economy, 39(3), 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miron, J. (2004). Drug War Crimes: The Consequences of Prohibition. Oakland: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  51. Morris, N. (2003). Maconochie’s Gentlemen: The Story of Norfolk Island and the Roots of Modern Prison Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy & Representative Government. New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
  53. North, D. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.Google Scholar
  54. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Plommer, W. (1969). The tyranny of the archon list. The Classical Review, 19(2), 126–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rajan, R. (2004). “The view from the IMF: Assume anarchy?” The Globalist. November 24.Google Scholar
  59. Scott, J. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Scott, J. (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, V. (2007). Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sobel, R., & Osoba, B. (2009). Youth gangs as pseudo-governments: Implications for violent crime. Southern Economic Journal, 75(4), 996–1018.Google Scholar
  64. Stiglitz, J. (1989). Markets, market failure, and development. American Economic Review, 79(2), 197–203.Google Scholar
  65. Thomas, D., & Martin, A. (2011). “Two tiered political entrepreneurship and the congressional committee system,” Public Choice. Google Scholar
  66. Thornton, M. (1991). The Economics of Prohibition. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  67. Tullock, G. (1965 [2005]). Bureaucracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  68. von Mises, L. (1944). Bureaucracy. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  69. von Mises, L. (1957 [2000]). Theory and History. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  70. Weber, M. (1925). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loyola University New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations