The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 335–354

The capital-based view of the firm

Article

Abstract

We offer here a capital-based view (CBV) that incorporates, and goes further than related views, (like the resource- and the knowledge-based view) of the firm. This general approach uses ideas about capital and its structure to examine the nature of heterogeneous resources and their attributes and how they are organized by entrepreneurs (individually and in teams). These entrepreneurs exercise judgment in valuing these heterogeneous resources in productive combinations that they attempt to create. This article uses insights gained from this understanding of the nature and function of capital to draw further propositions about the role of knowledge, management, and economic organization. We survey the main components of the CBV of the firm and examine management and organizational topics looking through the lens of the CBV. The capital dimension adds new insights and provides a powerful unifying framework.

Keywords

Capital-based theory Firm boundaries Firm governance Uncertainty Capital complexity Knowledge-based view 

References

  1. Arend, R. (2007). Abandoning entrepreneurship: children and victims first. Strategic Organization, 54, 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argarwal, R., Barney, J. B., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2009). Heterogeneous resources and the financial crisis: Implications of strategic management theory. Strategic Organization, 74, 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baetjer, H. (1998). Software as capital: An economic perspectives on software engineering. Los Alamos: IFEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  4. Baetjer, H. (2000). Capital as embodied knowledge: Some implications for the theory of economic growth. Review of Austrian Economics, 13(1), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baetjer, H., & Lewin, P. (2008). Can ideas be capital: Can capital be anything else? Available from: http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/Can%20Ideas%20be%20Captal.pdf.
  6. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules: Volume 1. The Power of Modularity Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, C. Y. (2008). Where do transactions costs come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 171, 155–195.Google Scholar
  8. Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1889 [1959]). Capital and Interest. 3 vols. (Trans. G. D. Huncke and H. F. Sennholz) South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bromilley, P. and Papenhausen, C. (2003) Assumptions of Rationality and Equilibrium in Strategy Research: The Limits of Traditional Economic Analysis. Strategic Organization November 1: pp 413–437.Google Scholar
  11. Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28, 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2008). On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: A rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew 2008. Organization Studies, 2902, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cyert, K. B., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Dean, A., & Kretschmer, M. (2007). Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foss, N. J. (1996a). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science, 75, 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foss, N. J. (1996b). More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organization Science, 75, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foss, N. J. (1997). Resources, firms and strategy: A reader in the resource-based perspective. Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Foss, N. J. (2001). Leadership, beliefs and coordination. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foss, K., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2007a). Original and derived judgment: An entrepreneurial theory of economic organization. Organization Studies, 2806, 1–20.Google Scholar
  21. Foss, K., Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Klein, S. K. (2007b). The 7 November, entrepreneurial organization of heterogeneous capital. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1165–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foss, N., & Ishikawa, I. (2007). Towards a dynamic resource-based view: Insights from Austrian capital and entrepreneurship theory. Organization Studies, 2805, 749–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship and heterogeneous capital. Chapter 4 of Foss, NJ and Klein, PG. Opportunity discovery and economic organization: Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Langlois, R. N. (Eds.). (2003). Managing in the modular age: Architectures, networks and organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.Google Scholar
  27. Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts and financial structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. In: Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  29. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jenson, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin & H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract economics (pp. 252–274). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity and discovery: Entrepreneurial action and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurial Journal, 2, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knight, F. H. (1921 [1965]). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Chicago: Kelly.Google Scholar
  34. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 75, 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 447, 1187–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lachmann, L. M. (1956 [1978]). Capital and its structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  38. Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The legacy of Max Weber. Berkley: Glendessary Press.Google Scholar
  39. Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 491, 19–37; reprinted in Nicolai Foss and Peter Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
  40. Langlois, R. N. (2007). The Austrian theory of the firm: Retrospect and prospect. Available from: http://web.uconn.edu/ciom/Langlois_GMU_paper_May_2007.pdf.
  41. Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. (1995). Firms, markets, and economic change: A dynamic theory of business institutions (p. 1995). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Lewin, P. (1994). Knowledge, Expectations and Capital: The Economics of Ludwig M. Lachmann. Advances in Austrian Economics 1, 1994, pp. 233–256.Google Scholar
  43. Lewin, P. (1997). Capital in Disequilibrium: A Reexamination of the Capital Theory of Ludwig Lachmann. History of Political Economy 29(3), 523–548.Google Scholar
  44. Lewin, P. (1999). Capital in disequilibrium: the role of capital in a changing world. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewin, P. (2005). The capital idea and the scope of economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 182, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewin, P. (2008). The firm in disequilibrium: Contributions from the Austrian tradition. Advances in Austrian Economics, 11, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewin, P. (2011). A Capital-Based Approach to the Firm: Reflections on the Nature and Scope of the Concept of Capital and its Extension to Intangibles. In Burton, A. and Spender, J. C. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Capital Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Loasby, B. J. (2007). The ubiquity of organization. Organization Studies, 2811, 1729–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathews, J. (2006a). Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mathews, J. (2006b). Ricardian rents or Knightian profits? More on Austrian insights on strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 41, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mathews, J. (2010). Lachmannian insights into strategic entrepreneurship: Resources, activities and routines in a disequilibrium world. Organization Studies, 312, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Menger, C. (1871 [1981]). Principles of economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mises, L. (1949). Human action. San Francisco: Fox and Wiles.Google Scholar
  54. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  55. Penrose, E. (1959 [1995]). The theory of the growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Richardson, G. B. (1960 [1997]). Information and investment: A study in the working of the competitive economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N. (2008). Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta 2007. Organization Studies, 2902, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sautet, F. (2001). An entrepreneurial theory of the firm. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of economic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (1776 [1976]). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Solow, R. M. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1), 65–94.Google Scholar
  63. Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.Google Scholar
  64. Tulloh, B., & Miller, M. S. (2006). Institutions as abstract boundaries. In J. High (Ed.), Humane economics: Essays in honor of Don Lavoie (pp. 89–118). Northhampton: Eward Elgar.Google Scholar
  65. Vanberg, V. (1994). Organizations as constitutional systems. In: Rules and choice in economics, chapter 8. Routledge pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
  66. Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at DallasDallasUSA
  2. 2.Towson UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations