Advertisement

Alertness, local knowledge, and Johnny Appleseed

  • David Skarbek
Article

Abstract

Anderson and Hill argue that property rights entrepreneurs, driven by non-replicable Kirznerian alertness, identify unowned and unpriced attributes of a resource and capture rents to those resources by limiting access to them. I argue that alertness is non-replicable, but it is also not random. Kirzner’s analytical framework emphasizes an individual’s local knowledge and subjective interpretative schema. Incorporating these concepts and emphasizing two types of local knowledge, about social and commercial conditions, explains why some people are alert to profit opportunities and others are not. This implies that economic restrictions are more detrimental to entrepreneurship than previously understood. I provide evidence by examining Johnny Appleseed’s successful nursery business.

Keywords

Property rights entrepreneurship Alertness Local knowledge Interpretive schema 

JEL Classification

D23 L26 B25 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks an anonymous referee, Peter Boettke, Stewart Dompe, Josh Hill, Emily Schaeffer, Richard Wagner, Larry H. White, and especially Peter Leeson for helpful comments. All remaining errors are, of course, the author’s own. He gratefully acknowledges generous research support from the Earhart Foundation and the Mercatus Center.

References

  1. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (1983). Privatizing the commons: an improvement. Southern Economics Journal, 50, 2.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (1990). The race for property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 1.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (2002). Cowboys and contracts. Journal of Legal Studies, 31, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (2004). The Not So Wild Wild West. Stanford Economics and Finance.Google Scholar
  5. Beaulier, S. A., & Prychitko, D. L. (2006). Disagreement over the emergence of private property rights: alternative meanings, alternative explanations. Review of Austrian Economics, 19, 1.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2008). Institutional stickiness and the new development economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Beaumont, L. B. (1917). “Swedenborg” in Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. Volume XII. Ed. James Hastings. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Fleck, R. K., & Hanssen, A. F. (2005). “Rulers Ruled by Women”: An Economic Analysis of the Rise and Fall of Women’s Rights in Ancient Sparta. Working Paper. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=788106.
  9. Geddes, R., & Lueck, D. (2002). The gains from self-ownership and the expansion of women’s rights. The American Economic Review, 92, 1079–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hibbard, B. H. (1939). A History of the Public Land Policies. New York: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  11. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Klein, D. B. (1997). Discovery Factors of Economic Freedom: Respondence, Epiphany, and Serendipity. Pp. 165-180 in Uncertainty and Economic Evolution: Essays in Honor of Armen A. Alchian, edited by John R. Lott Jr. London and New York: Routledge, 165–180.Google Scholar
  14. Leeson, P. T., Coyne, C., & Boettke, P. J. (2006). Does the market self-correct?: asymmetrical adjustment structure of economic error. Review of Political Economy, 18, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollan, M. (2001). The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s Eye View of the World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Price, R. (1967). Johnny Appleseed: Man and Myth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, A. (1989). “A Kind of Warr”: the contest for land on the Northeastern Frontier, 1750–1820. The William and Mary Quarterly, 46, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teahan, J. F. (1979). Warren Felt Evans and mental healing: romantic idealism and practical mysticism in Nineteenth-Century America. Church History, 48, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations