The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 45–59

Mises’ democracy–dictatorship equivalence theorem: A critique



Ludwig von Mises argues that public opinion, not the form of government, is the ultimate determinant of policy. The implication is that, holding public opinion constant, democracies and dictatorships will have the same policies—a result I call Mises’ Democracy–Dictatorship Equivalence Theorem. According to Mises, dictators have to comply with public opinion or else they will be overthrown. I argue that he seriously overestimates the power of revolution to discipline dictators. Mises was perceptive to note that, in practice, “dictatorially imposed” policies are often democratically sustainable, but he neglected several mechanisms—all more plausible than the threat of revolution—capable of explaining this fact.


Democracy Dictatorship Public opinion Revolution 

JEL codes

D72 D74 D70 


  1. Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2005). Good bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. NBER working paper 11700.Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum, A. (1994). The fall and rise of the communists: Guess who’s running central Europe? Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 7–13.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R. (1997). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caplan, B., & Stringham, E. (2005). Mises, Bastiat, public opinion, and public choice: What’s wrong with democracy. Review of Political Economy, 17(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colton, T. (2000). Transitional citizens: Voters and what influences them in the New Russia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Conquest, R. (1986). Harvest of sorrow: Soviet collectivization and the terror-famine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. de la Boetie, E. (1975). The politics of obedience: the discourse of voluntary servitude. New York: Free Life Editions.Google Scholar
  9. Deacon, R., & Saha, S. (2006). In A. Ott, & R. Cebula (Eds.) Public good provision in dictatorships: A survey. The Elgar companion to public economics: Empirical public economics. Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Fessenden, H. (2002). Red dawn. Foreign Affairs, 81(1), 177–91.Google Scholar
  11. Fu, Z. (1993). Autocratic tradition and chinese politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Galetovic, A., & Sanhueza, R. (2000). Citizens, autocrats, and plotters: A model and new evidence on coups d’etat. Economics and Politics, 12(2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman, H. (2000). The state: Agent or proprietor? Economics of Governance, 1(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
  14. Gryzmała-Busse, A. (2002). Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Höijer, R. (2004). Theft by bandits and taxation by kings: A critique of Mancur Olson on state formation. Political Studies Review, 2(1), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hummel, J. (1990). National goods versus public goods: Defense, disarmament, and free riders. Review of Austrian Economics, 4(1), 88–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, B., & Olken, B. (2005). Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 835–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klemperer, P. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), 515–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (1997). Rational choice, collective action and the paradox of rebellion. Copenhagen, Denmark: Institute of Political Science and Political Studies Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, P. (2001). Party development and democratic change in post-communist europe: The first decade. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  22. Malia, M. (1994). The soviet tragedy: A history of socialism in Russia, 1917–1991. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. McGuire, M., & Olson, M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), 72–96.Google Scholar
  24. Mill, J. S. (2006). Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. In J. S. Mill (Ed.) Collected works of John Stuart Mill, Volume III. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  25. Mises, L. v. (1978). Liberalism: A socio-economic exposition. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews, and McMeel.Google Scholar
  26. Mises, L. v. (1980). Planning for freedom. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mises, L. v. (1981). Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Mises, L. v. (1983a). Bureaucracy. NY: Arlington House.Google Scholar
  29. Mises, L. v. (1983b). Nation, state, and economy. NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mises, L. v. (1985a). Theory and history. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Mises, L. v. (1985b). Omnipotent government. Spring Mills, PA: Libertarian Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Mises, L. v. (1998a). Human action. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Mises, L. v. (1998b). Interventionism: An economic analysis. Irvington-on Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
  34. Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Mulligan, C., Gil, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  38. Pipes, R. (1974). Russia under the old regime. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Pipes, R. (1990). The Russian revolution. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  40. Pipes, R. (2004). Flight from freedom: What Russians think and want. Foreign Affairs, 83(3), 9–15.Google Scholar
  41. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Salisburg, H. (1992). The new emperors: China in the era of Mao and Deng. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  43. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  45. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shikaki, K. (2004). The future of Palestine. Foreign Affairs, 83(6), 45–60.Google Scholar
  47. Tullock, G. (1974). The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg, VA: University Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  49. Velasco, A. (1994). The state and economic policy: Chile 1952–92. In B. Bosworth, R. Dornbusch, & R. Labán (Eds.) The Chilean economy: Policy lessons and challenges (pp. 379–429). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  50. Werth, N. (1999). A state against its people: Violence, repression, and terror in the Soviet Union. In S. Courtois, N. Werth, J.-L. Panne, A. Paczkowski, K. Bartošek, & J.-L. Margolin (Eds.) The black book of communism: Crimes, terror, repression (pp. 32–268). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Center for Study of Public Choice, and Mercatus CenterGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations