The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 29–54 | Cite as

The Regulation of Private Schools Serving Low-Income Families in Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

This paper sets out some findings of a research project carried out in private unaided schools in low-income areas of Hyderabad, India. The part of the research project documented here was designed to examine the question: ‘Is the regulatory regime conducive to entrepreneurial action and market discovery’ with particular reference to the low-income schools in Hyderabad. This paper is narrowly focused, setting out the results of pattern matching empirical data with the Austrian economic concepts of entrepreneurship, rivalry, and market discovery. The research discovered that two regulatory regimes exist, one that is set out ‘on paper’ in the Education Acts and associated rules, and another that operates ‘in practice’. That is, there is a combination of regulations ‘on paper’ and regulations existing in an ‘extra-legal’ sector. Generally it was found that the regulations ‘in practice’ are consistent with market principles. Conversely the regulations set out ‘on paper’ are not conducive to entrepreneurial innovation and market discovery. Recommendations for potential policy initiatives include the possibility of legitimising the ‘extra-legal’ sector by introducing self-regulation possibly via self-evaluation systems for the private unaided schools.

Keywords

competition entrepreneurship profit regulation private schools low-income families developing countries India 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwal, Y. (2000) Public and Private Partnership in Primary Education in India: A Study of Unrecognised Schools in Haryana. New Delhi: National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Alderman, H., Orazem, P. F., and Paterno, E. M. (1996) “School Quality, School Cost and the Public/Private School Choices of Low-Income Households in Pakistan.” Working Paper Series on ‘Impact Evaluation of Education Reforms’ Paper No. 2. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Bainton, D. M. (1983) “State Regulation of Private Religious Schools and the States Interest in Education.” Arizona Law Review, 25: 123–149.Google Scholar
  4. Bashir, S. (1994) “Public versus Private in Primary Education: Comparisons of School Effectiveness and Costs in Tamil Nadu.” Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, London: London School of Economic.Google Scholar
  5. Bashir, S. (1997) “The Cost Effectiveness of Public and Private Schools: Knowledge Gaps, New Research Methodologies and an Application in India.” In: Colclough, C. (Ed.) Marketizing Education and Health in Developing Countries: Miracle of Mirage? pp. 124–164, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bashir, S. (2002) Karnataka: Financing Education in the Context of Economic Restructuring. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, J. (1982) “Enforced Self-regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control.” Michigan Law Review, 80: 1466–1507.Google Scholar
  8. Carper, J. C. and Devins, N. E. (1985) “Rendering Unto Caesar; State Regulation of Christian Day Schools.” Journal of Thought, 20: 99–113.Google Scholar
  9. CfBT (2001) Quality Matters: The Standards Reading: CfBT.Google Scholar
  10. Chubb, J. E. and Moe, T. M. (1990) Politics, Markets and Americas Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  11. De Soto, H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  12. Diehl, B. (1983) “The Right to Regulate Non-Public Education.” The Urban Lawyer, 15(1): 97–111.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, P. (2003) “The Regulation of Private Schools for Low-Income Families in Andhra Pradesh, India: An Austrian Economic Approach.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
  14. Drèze, J. and Sen, A. (2002) India: Development and Participation, 2nd edn. New Delhi, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Encarnation, D. J. (1983) “Public Finance and Regulation of Nonpublic Education: Retrospect and Prospect.” In: James, T. and Levin, H. M. (Eds.) Public Dollars for Private Schools Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Erickson, D. A. (1984) “Bad Fences Make Bad Neighbors: A look at State Regulation of Private Schools.” In: Carper, J. C. and Hunt, T. C. (Eds.) Religious Schooling in America, pp. 227–244. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  17. Erickson, D. A. (1986) “Choice and Private Schools: Dynamics of Supply and Demand.” In: Levy, D. C. (Ed.) Private Education: Studies in Choice and Public Policy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 82–109.Google Scholar
  18. Foley, E. B. (1996) “The Regulation of Private Schools.” Capital University Law Review, 25: 819–839.Google Scholar
  19. Furst, L. G. (1985) “Indirect Government Control of Non-Public Schools: A Review of Court Decisions.” ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED263482.Google Scholar
  20. Govinda, R. and Varghese, N. V. (1993) Quality of Primary Schooling in India: A Case Study of Madhya Pradesh Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  21. Harbison, R. W. and Hanushek, E. A. (1992) Educational Performance of the Poor: Lessons from Rural Northeast BrazilOxford University Press (Published for the World Bank).Google Scholar
  22. Hirschoff, M. M. U. (1986) “Public Policy Toward Private Schools: A Focus on Parental Choice.” In: Levy, D. C. (Ed.) Private Education: Studies in Choice and Public Policy, pp. 33–57, Oxford and NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Independent Schools Association of Southern Africa (2001) The Constitution, [Internet]. Available from:〈http://www.isasa.org/docs/ISASA_C.pdf〉 [Accessed September 2002].
  24. Independent Schools Council (2002) Independent Schools Inspectorate—ISI Handbook. [Internet], Available from: 〈http://www.isinspect.org.uk/documentation/docindex.htm#H〉 [Accessed September 2002]
  25. Jimenez, E., Lockheed, M., and Wattanawaha, N. (1988) “The Relative Efficency of Private and Public Schools: The Case of Thailand.” The World Bank Economic Review, 2(2): 139–164.Google Scholar
  26. Jimenez, E. and Cox, D. (1989) The Relative Effectiveness of Private and Public Schools: Evidence from Two Developing Countries. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Kingdon, G. (1994) “An Economic Evaluation of School Management Types in Urban India: A Case Study of Uttar Pradesh.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  28. Kingdon, G. (1996a) “The Quality and Efficiency of Private and Public Education: A Case Study in Urban India.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(1): 57–81.Google Scholar
  29. Kingdon, G. (1996b) Private Schools in India: Size, Nature, and Equity-Effects The Development Economics Research Programme, London: LSE STICERD Centre.Google Scholar
  30. Kirzner, I. M. (1973) Competition and EntrepreneurshipChicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kirzner, I. M. (1978) The Perils of Regulation: A Market Process Approach Coral Gables, Florida: Law and Economics Center, Miami School of Law, LEC occasional paper.Google Scholar
  32. Kirzner, I. M. (1985) Discovery and the Capitalist Process Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kirzner, I. M. (1997) How Markets Work: Disequilibrium, Entrepreneurship and Discovery London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  34. Koutsky, J. (1996) “Access to Higher Education in the Czech republic: From Central Regulation to a Balance of Incentives.” Higher Education Policy, 9(2): 113–124.Google Scholar
  35. Maxwell, J., Provan, D., and Fielden, J. (2000) State Controlled or Market Directed? Regulation of Private Universities in the Commonwealth, CHEMS.Google Scholar
  36. Mises, Ludwig von. (1949, [1996]) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 4th edn. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.Google Scholar
  37. Mitra, C. (1998) The Corrupt Society: The Crimilization of India from Independence to the 1990s, New Delhi, India: Viking Penguin India.Google Scholar
  38. Moja, T., et al. (1996) “Towards New Forms of Regulation in Higher Education: The Case of South Africa.” Higher Education, 32(2): 199–231.Google Scholar
  39. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) (1998), Urban Community Development Handbook. Director of Urban Community Development, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  40. Murnane, R. J. (1986) “Comparisons of Private and Public Schools: The Critical Role of Regulation.” In: Levy, D. C. (Ed.) Private Education: Studies in Choice and Public Policy. Oxford and NY: Oxford University Press (chapter 5), pp. 138–152.Google Scholar
  41. Randall, E. V. (1992) “Private Schools and State Regulation.” The Urban Lawyer, 24(2): 341–378.Google Scholar
  42. Randall, E. V. (1994) Private Schools and Public Power: A Case for Pluralism N.Y.: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  43. Richardson, G. and Fielden, J. (1997) “Measuring the Grip of the State: The Relationship Between Governments and Universities in Selected Commonwealth Countries.” A discussion paper, Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service.Google Scholar
  44. Sen, A. (1999) Development as FreedomNew York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  45. Singh, R. P. (1997). Census of India 1991, Series 2, Andhra Pradesh: District Census Handbook Hyderabad. Government of Andhra Pradesh, India.Google Scholar
  46. Smolin, D. M. (1986) “State Regulation of Private education: Ohio Law in the Shadow of the United States Supreme Court Decision.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 54: 1003–1033.Google Scholar
  47. The Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982, in Rao, V. J. (2000) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh: Second Edition Vol. I Hyderabad: J.D. Gogia for S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  48. The Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Establishment, Recognition, Administration and Control of Schools Under Private Management) Rules, 1993, in Rao, V. J. (2000) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh: Second Edition, Vol. I, pp. 936–958. Hyderabad: J.D. Gogia for S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  49. The Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Inspection and Visits) Rules, 1988, in Rao, V. J. (2001) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh, 2nd edn. Vol. II, pp. 1152–1174, Hyderabad: S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  50. The Andhra Pradesh (Integrated) Education Rules (1966) Elementary (Primary) Schools in Rao, V. J. (2000) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh: Second Edition Vol. I, pp. 673–878, Hyderabad: J.D. Gogia for S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  51. The Andhra Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1985, in Rao, V. J. (2001) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh: Second Edition Vol. II, pp. 1719–1735, Hyderabad: J.D. Gogia for S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  52. The Andhra Pradesh Registered Schools (Establishment, Recognition, Registration and Regulation) Rules, 1987 in Rao, V. J. (2001) Law of Education in Andhra Pradesh, 2nd edn. Vol. II, pp. 999–1030, Hyderabad: J.D. Gogia for S. Gogia & Company.Google Scholar
  53. The Probe Team (1999) Public Report on Basic Education in IndiaOxford and New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Tooley, J. (2001) The Global Education Industry, 2nd edn. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  55. Tooley, J. and Dixon, P. (2003) “Providing Education to the World’s Poor: A Case Study of the Private Sector in India.” In: Davies, B. and West-Burnham, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management pp. 342–354, London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  56. Unni Krishnan, J. P. v State of A. P. (1993) Air 1993 Supreme Court 2179. Hyderabad: J. D. Gogia for S. Gogia & CompanyGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins, K. (2000) The Oxfam Education Report Oxford: Oxfam in Great Britain.Google Scholar
  58. World Education Forum (2000) Education For All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments, [Internet] UNESCO. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/efa/ed_for_all/dakfram_eng.shtml [Accessed September 2002].
  59. Yilmaz, Y. (1998) “Private Regulation: A Real Alternative for Regulatory Reform.” In: Desai, A. V. (Ed.) Self Regulation in the Civil Society New Delhi, Centre for Civil Society, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.E.G. West CentreUniversity of NewcastleEngland

Personalised recommendations