Advertisement

Reliability and validity of PROMIS® pediatric family relationships short form in children 8–17 years of age with chronic disease

  • Elizabeth D. CoxEmail author
  • Jennifer R. Connolly
  • Mari Palta
  • Victoria P. Rajamanickam
  • Kathryn E. Flynn
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Families play a key role in managing pediatric chronic illness. The PROMIS® pediatric family relationships measure was developed primarily within the general pediatric population. We evaluated the Family Relationships short form in the context of pediatric chronic diseases.

Methods

Children aged 8–17 years with asthma (n = 73), type 1 diabetes (n = 122), or sickle cell disease (n = 80) completed the Family Relationships 8a short form and the PROMIS Pediatric Profile-25′s six domains representing physical, mental, and social health. Parents (N = 275) of these children completed the parent versions of the same measures. We evaluated reliability of the Family Relationships measure using Cronbach’s alpha and IRT-based marginal reliability, and the standard error of measurement (SEM). Convergent/discriminant validity were assessed from correlations between the Family Relationships domain and the PROMIS-25 domains.

Results

SEM increased for scores above the normative mean of 50. Cronbach’s alpha and IRT-estimated marginal reliabilities exceeded 0.80 for children and parents across diseases, except in asthma, where marginal reliability was 0.75 for parents. Scores displayed small to large correlations in the expected directions with social and mental health domains. The largest correlations occurred with parents’ proxy reports of children’s depressive symptoms in sickle cell disease and asthma, r = − 0.60 (95% CI − 0.74, − 0.48) and r = − 0.58 (95% CI − 0.68, − 0.48) respectively.

Conclusions

The Family Relationships 8-item short form demonstrated adequate reliability and convergent/discriminant validity for use in pediatric chronic conditions, though scores above the mean displayed greater uncertainty. Evidence of the measure’s reliability and validity in multiple contexts furthers the case for its use.

Keywords

Family relationships PROMIS® Patient-reported outcomes Children Survey validation Social health Chronic disease 

Notes

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U19 AR069519. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All participating parents provided informed consent. Participating children ages 14–17 years also gave informed consent, while children ages 8–13 years provided assent.

References

  1. 1.
    Perez-Marin, M., Gomez-Rico, I., & Montoya-Castilla, I. (2015). Type 1 diabetes mellitus: psychosocial factors and adjustment of pediatric patient and his/her family. Review. Archivos Argentinos De Pediatría, 113(2), 158–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreira, H., Frontini, R., Bullinger, M., & Canavarro, M. C. (2013). Caring for a child with type 1 diabetes: Links between family cohesion, perceived impact, and parental adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 731–742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raphael, J. L., Butler, A. M., Rattler, T. L., Kowalkowski, M. A., Mueller, B. U., & Giordano, T. P. (2013). Parental information, motivation, and adherence behaviors among children with sickle cell disease. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 60(7), 1204–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Logan, D. E., Radcliffe, J., & Smith-Whitley, K. (2002). Parent factors and adolescent sickle cell disease: Associations with patterns of health service use. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(5), 475–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hildenbrand, A. K., Barakat, L. P., Alderfer, M. A., & Marsac, M. L. (2015). Coping and coping assistance among children with sickle cell disease and their parents. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 37(1), 25–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    La Greca, A. M., Auslander, W. F., Greco, P., Spetter, D., Fisher, E. B., & Santiago, J. V. (1995). I get by with a little help from my family and friends: Adolescents’ support for diabetes care. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20(4), 449–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christiaanse, M. E., Lavigne, J. V., & Lerner, C. V. (1989). Psychosocial aspects of compliance in children and adolescents with asthma. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 10(2), 75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cutfield, S. W., Derraik, J. G. B., Reed, P. W., Hofman, P. L., Jefferies, C., & Cutfield, W. S. (2011). Early markers of glycaemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hazen, E., Schlozman, S., & Beresin, E. (2008). Adolescent psychological development: A review. Pediatrics in Review, 29(5), 161–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanson, C. L., Henggeler, S. W., Harris, M. A., Burghen, G. A., & Moore, M. (1989). Family system variables and the health status of adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Psychology, 8(2), 239–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauser, S. T., Jacobson, A. M., Lavori, P., Wolfsdorf, J. I., Herskowitz, R. D., Milley, J. E., et al. (1990). Adherence among children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus over a 4-year longitudinal follow-up: II. Immediate and long-term linkages with the family milieu. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 15(4), 527–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanson, C. L. (1992). Developing systemic models of the adaptation of youths with diabetes. In A. M. La Greca, L. J. Siegel, J. L. Wallander, & C. E. Walker (Eds.), Advances in pediatric psychology: Stress and coping in child health (pp. 212–241). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walders, N., Drotar, D., & Kercsmar, C. (2000). The allocation of family responsibility for asthma management tasks in African-American adolescents. Journal of Asthma, 37(1), 89–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helgeson, V. S., Palladino, D. K., Reynolds, K. A., Becker, D. J., Escobar, O., & Siminerio, L. (2014). Relationships and health among emerging adults with and without type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 33(10), 1125–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosland, A. M., Heisler, M., & Piette, J. D. (2012). The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(1), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1994). Family environment scale manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Furman, W., & Giberson, R. S. (1995). Identifying the links between parents and their children’s sibling relationships. In S. Shulman (Ed.), Close relationships and socioemotional development (pp. 95–108). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bevans, K. B., Riley, A. W., Landgraf, J. M., Carle, A. C., Teneralli, R. E., Fiese, B. H., et al. (2017). Children’s family experiences: Development of the PROMIS® pediatric family relationships measures. Quality of Life Research, 26(11), 3011–3023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Cleave, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & Perrin, J. M. (2010). Dynamics of obesity and chronic health conditions among children and youth. JAMA, 303(7), 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Most Recent National Asthma Data. https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_national_asthma_data.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
  22. 22.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Data & Statistics on Sickle Cell Disease. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/sicklecell/data.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
  23. 23.
    Menke, A., Orchard, T. J., Imperatore, G., Bullard, K. M., Mayer-Davis, E., & Cowie, C. C. (2013). The prevalence of type 1 diabetes in the United States. Epidemiology, 24(5), 773–774.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeWalt, D. A., Gross, H. E., Gipson, D. S., Selewski, D. T., DeWitt, E. M., Dampier, C. D., et al. (2015). PROMIS® pediatric self-report scales distinguish subgroups of children within and across six common pediatric chronic health conditions. Quality of Life Research, 24(9), 2195–2208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Erker, C., Yan, K., Zhang, L. Y., Bingen, K., Flynn, K. E., & Panepinto, J. (2018). Impact of pediatric cancer on family relationships. Cancer Medicine, 7(5), 1680–1688.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2016). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (3rd ed., p. 139). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hahn, E. A., Devellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1035–1044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Flynn, K. E., Kliems, H., Saoji, N., Svenson, J., & Cox, E. D. (2018). Content validity of the PROMIS® pediatric family relationships measure for children with chronic illness. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(1), 203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biostatistics and Medical InformaticsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations