Advertisement

Comparison of generic and condition-specific oral health-related quality of life instruments in patients with oral submucous fibrosis

  • Shailesh M. GondivkarEmail author
  • Rahul R. Bhowate
  • Amol R. Gadbail
  • Rima S. Gondivkar
  • Sachin C. Sarode
  • Gargi S. Saode
Article

Abstract

Purpose

With the growing interest in health economics, there is a demand for best valid instrument to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). The objective of this study was to compare the convergent and discriminative properties of the condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF and generic OHIP-14 in OSF patients.

Methods

The OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 instruments were administered concurrently to 300 clinically diagnosed OSF patients. Analysis of both the instruments was carried out by using descriptive statistics. The internal consistency and reproducibility of the instruments were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient respectively. The convergent and discriminative validity were then determined and compared.

Results

The OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 exhibited good psychometric properties for internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.88) and reproducibility (ICC > 0.85). A positive associations were observed between both the instruments, but a high prevalence of patients with no impact was noted using the OHIP-14. Both the instruments were able to discriminate between patients with different clinical stages of OSF, but OHRQoL-OSF was more responsive in the early stages of OSF. The OHRQoL-OSF demonstrated greater sensitivity for ‘discomfort and functional impairment’.

Conclusions

The condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF identified OSF patients with impaired oral health-related QoL more easily with greater discriminative properties. To better understand patient reported experiences in OSF, these results may guide the choice of instrument in future researches and surveys.

Keywords

Quality of life Oral health Oral submucous fibrosis OHRQoL-OSF OHIP-14 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the patients who took part in the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the Institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Petersen, P. E. (2003). The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century- the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology, 31, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sischo, L., & Broder, H. L. (2011). Oral health-related quality of life: What, why, how, and future implications. Journal of Dental Research, 90, 1264–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DHHS. (2000). Oral health in America: A report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gomes, A. S., & Abegg, C. (2007). The impact of oral health on daily performance of municipal waste disposal workers in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do, Sul State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 23, 1707–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benyamini, Y., Leventhal, H., & Leventahal, E. A. (2004). Self-rated oral health as an independent predictor of self-rated general health, self-esteem and life satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gondivkar, S. M., Gadbail, A. R., Sarode, S. C., & Patil, S. (2017). Quality of life assessment should be part of oral health evaluations in day-to-day practice. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 8, 857–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christie, M., French, D., Sowden, A., & West, A. (1993). Development of child centered, disease-specific questionnaires for living with asthma. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shevale, V. V., Kalra, R. D., Shevale, V. V., & Shringarpure, M. D. (2012). Management of oral sub-mucous fibrosis: A review. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences, 4, 107–114.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gondivkar, S. M., Bhowate, R. R., Gadbail, A. R., et al. (2018). Quality of life related “patient reported outcome measures” in oral submucous fibrosis patients. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practices, 19, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rimal, J., & Shrestha, A. (2015). Validation of nepalese oral health impact profile14 and assessment of its impact in patients with oral submucous fibrosis in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 13, 43–49.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kularatna, S., Whitty, J. A., Johnson, N. W., Jayasinghe, R., & Scuffham, P. A. (2016). A comparison of health state utility values associated with oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer in Sri Lanka assessed using the EQ-5D-3 L and the EORTC-8D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, F., et al. (2015). Allicin as a possible adjunctive therapeutic drug for stage II oral submucous fibrosis: A preliminary clinical trial in a Chinese cohort. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 44, 1540–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tadakamadla, J., Kumar, S., Lalloo, R., Gandhi Babu, D. B., & Johnson, N. W. (2017). Impact of oral potentially malignant disorders on quality of life. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 47(1), 60–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raja, J. V., Rai, P., Kumar, N. C., Khan, M., & Chandrashekar, H. (2013). Psychiatric morbidity among patients with oral submucous fibrosis: A controlled study. Oral Health and Dental Management, 12, 85–94.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gondivkar, S. M., Gadbail, A. R., Gondivkar, R. S., Sarode, S. C., Sarode, G. S., & Patil, S. (2018). Impact of oral potentially malignant disorders on quality of life: A systematic review. Future Oncology, 14, 995–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gondivkar, S. M., Bhowate, R. R., Gadbail, A. R., et al. (2018). Development and validation of oral health related quality of life measure in oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Diseases, 24(6), 1020–1028.  https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. F. (2008). Devising the items. In D. L. Streiner & G. F. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 17–36). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pindborg, J. J., & Sirsat, M. (1966). Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology, 22, 764–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pindborg, J. J., Murti, P. R., Bhonsle, R. B., Gupta, P. C., Daftary, D. K., & Mehta, F. S. (1984). Oral submucous fibrosis as a precancerous condition. Scandinavian Journal Dental Research, 92, 224–229.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lai, D. R., Chen, H. R., Huang, Y. L., & Tsai, C. C. (1995). Clinical evaluation of different treatment methods of oral submucous fibrosis. A 10-years’ experience with 150 cases. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 24, 402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gondivkar, S. M., Bhowate, R. R., Gadbail, A. R., et al. (2018). Impact of oral submucous fibrosis on oral health-related quality of life: A condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF instrument analysis. Oral Diseases, 24(8), 1442–1448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186–3191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Slade, G. D., Nuttall, N., Sanders, A. E., Steele, J. G., Allen, P. F., & Lahti, S. (2005). Impacts of oral disorders in the United Kingdom and Australia. British Dental Journal, 198, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Locker, D., & Allen, P. F. (2002). Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 62, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Cronbach’s alpha. British Medical Journal, 314, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allen, P. F., & McMillan, A. S. (2003). A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clinical Oral Implant Research, 14, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Allen, P. F., McMillan, A. S., & Walshadaw, D. A. (1999). Comparison of the validity of generic and disease specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology, 27, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rana, M., Kanatas, A., Herzberg, P. Y., Gellrich, N. C., & Rana, M. (2015). Relevance of psychosocial factors to quality of life in oral cancer and oral lichen planus: A prospective comparative study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 53, 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shailesh M. Gondivkar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rahul R. Bhowate
    • 2
  • Amol R. Gadbail
    • 3
  • Rima S. Gondivkar
    • 4
  • Sachin C. Sarode
    • 5
  • Gargi S. Saode
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Oral Medicine & RadiologyGovernment Dental College & HospitalNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Oral Medicine & RadiologySharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, DMIMS (DU)WardhaIndia
  3. 3.Department of DentistryIndira Gandhi Government Medical College & HospitalNagpurIndia
  4. 4.Dental SurgeonNagpurIndia
  5. 5.Department of Oral Pathology & MicrobiologyDr. D.Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil VidyapeethPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations