Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1305–1314 | Cite as

Change in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: population-based longitudinal study

  • Yves HenchozEmail author
  • Nazanin Abolhassani
  • Christophe Büla
  • Idris Guessous
  • René Goy
  • Brigitte Santos-Eggimann
Article

Abstract

Purpose

This population-based study aimed to determine 5-year change in multidimensional QoL among community-dwelling older people, and to identify predictors of QoL change among demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics.

Methods

Data of the 2011 and 2016 annual assessments of 1845 older men and women (age range 68–77 years) from the Lc65 + cohort study were used. QoL was assessed using a 28-item instrument yielding a QoL overall score and seven domain-specific QoL subscores. Additional ratings of QoL included a single item (excellent; very good; good; fair; poor), expected QoL in 1 year (better; worse; same as today), and retrospective assessment of QoL 5-year change (better; worse; same as 5 years ago). The predictors of 5-year change in the QoL score were assessed using linear regression, controlling for baseline QoL score.

Results

All prospective and retrospective indicators of QoL converged towards a slight deterioration over 5 years. QoL subscores significantly decreased in domains “Close entourage” (P = 0.004), “Social and cultural life” (P < 0.001), “Esteem and recognition” (P = 0.001), “Health and mobility” (P < 0.001), and “Autonomy” (P < 0.001), whereas “Material resources” (P = 0.345) and “Feeling of safety” (P = 0.380) remained stable. A stronger decrease in QoL was observed in the most vulnerable profiles at baseline in terms of demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics. Changes in depressive symptoms and in disability—either worsening or improving—predicted QoL change in the expected direction.

Conclusions

Age-related decline in QoL may be limited through the prevention of disability and depressive symptoms, and more generally by devoting special attention to vulnerable profiles.

Keywords

Quality of life Epidemiology of ageing Gerontology Cohort studies 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by a prize awarded by the Leenaards Foundation. The Lc65 + study has been supported by University of Lausanne Hospital Centre; University of Lausanne Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine; Canton de Vaud Department of Public Health; City of Lausanne; Loterie Romande [research grant 2006–2008]; Lausanne University Faculty of Biology and Medicine [multidisciplinary research grant 2006]; Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research [grant 3247B0-120795/1]; and Fondation Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne. The sponsors had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11136_2019_2108_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (245 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 245 KB)
11136_2019_2108_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (56 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 56 KB)
11136_2019_2108_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (53 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 53 KB)
11136_2019_2108_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (56 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 56 KB)
11136_2019_2108_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (86 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 86 KB)
11136_2019_2108_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (87 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (PDF 87 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. (2012). World Health Day: Are You Ready? What You Need to Know About Ageing. Geneva. Retrieved February 25, 2015 from http://www.who.int/world-health-day/2012/toolkit/background/en/index.html.
  2. 2.
    Vanleerberghe, P., De Witte, N., Claes, C., Schalock, R. L., & Verte, D. (2017) The quality of life of older people aging in place: A literature review. Quality of Life Research 26, 2899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHO. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laslett, L. L., Quinn, S. J., Winzenberg, T. M., Sanderson, K., Cicuttini, F., & Jones, G. (2012). A prospective study of the impact of musculoskeletal pain and radiographic osteoarthritis on health related quality of life in community dwelling older people. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bindawas, S. M., Al Snih, S., Ottenbacher, A. J., Graham, J., Protas, E. E., & Markides, K. S. et al. (2015). Association between lower extremity performance and health-related quality of life in elderly Mexican Americans. Journal on Aging Health, 27, 1026–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisele, M., Kaduszkiewicz, H., Konig, H. H., Lange, C., Wiese, B., & Prokein, J. et al. (2015). Determinants of health-related quality of life in older primary care patients: Results of the longitudinal observational AgeCoDe study. British Journal of General Practice, 65, e716–e723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webb, E., Blane, D., McMunn, A., & Netuveli, G. (2011). Proximal predictors of change in quality of life at older ages. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Healths, 65, 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gobbens, R. J., & van Assen, M. A. (2014). The prediction of quality of life by physical, psychological and social components of frailty in community-dwelling older people. Quality of Life Researchs, 23, 2289–2300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychologys, 13, 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cramm, J. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2015). Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatrics, 15, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. 3rd (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hudson, N. W., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2016). Getting older, feeling less? A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of developmental patterns in experiential well-being. Psychology and Aging, 31, 847–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gana, K., Bailly, N., Saada, Y., Joulain, M., & Alaphilippe, D. (2013). Does life satisfaction change in old age: Results from an 8-year longitudinal study. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    St John, P. D., Tyas, S. L., & Montgomery, P. R. (2013). Life satisfaction and frailty in community-based older adults: Cross-sectional and prospective analyses. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1709–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsu, H. C. (2012). Trajectories and covariates of life satisfaction among older adults in Taiwan. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatricsss, 55, 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lim, H. J., Min, D. K., Thorpe, L., & Lee, C. H. (2017). Trajectories of life satisfaction and their predictors among Korean older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 17, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Estabrook, R., Schupp, J., Wagner, G. G., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Life satisfaction shows terminal decline in old age: Longitudinal evidence from the German socio-economic panel study (SOEP). Developmental Psychology, 44, 1148–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lim, H. J., Min, D. K., Thorpe, L., & Lee, C. H. (2016). Multidimensional construct of life satisfaction in older adults in Korea: A six-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatrics, 16, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santos-Eggimann, B., Karmaniola, A., Seematter-Bagnoud, L., Spagnoli, J., Büla, C., & Cornuz, J. et al. (2008). The Lausanne cohort Lc65+: A population-based prospective study of the manifestations, determinants and outcomes of frailty. BMC Geriatrics, 8, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henchoz, Y., Meylan, L., Goy, R., Guessous, I., Bula, C., & Demont, M. et al. (2015). Domains of importance to the quality of life of older people from two Swiss regions. Age and Ageing, 44, 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calderon-Larranaga, A., Vetrano, D. L., Onder, G., Gimeno-Feliu, L. A., Coscollar-Santaliestra, C., Carfí, A. et al. (2017). Assessing and measuring chronic multimorbidity in the older population: A proposal for its operationalization. The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 72, 1417–1423.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997). Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970). Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist, 10, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    UNESCO. International Standard Classification of Education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2011 [Accessed 26 October 2016]; Retrieved October 26, 2016 from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx.
  27. 27.
    Finkel, S. E. (1995) Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aickin, M. (2009). Dealing with change: Using the conditional change model for clinical research. The Permanente Journal, 13, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Basu, A., & Manca, A. (2012). Regression estimators for generic health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years. Medical Decision Making, 32, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang, I. C., Frangakis, C., Atkinson, M. J., Willke, R. J., Leite, W. L., & Vogel, W. B. et al. (2008). Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: A comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease. Health Services Research, 43, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bowling, A., & Stenner, P. (2011). Which measure of quality of life performs best in older age? A comparison of the OPQOL, CASP-19 and WHOQOL-OLD. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gale, C. R., Cooper, C., Deary, I. J., & Aihie Sayer, A. (2014). Psychological well-being and incident frailty in men and women: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Psychological Medicine, 44, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nieuwkerk, P. T., Tollenaar, M. S., Oort, F. J., & Sprangers, M. A. (2007). Are retrospective measures of change in quality of life more valid than prospective measures? Medical Care, 45, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blome, C., & Augustin, M. (2015). Measuring change in quality of life: Bias in prospective and retrospective evaluation. Value Health, 18, 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cheng, S. T., Fung, H. H., & Chan, A. C. (2009). Self-perception and psychological well-being: The benefits of foreseeing a worse future. Psychology and Aging, 24, 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sarkisian, C. A., Hays, R. D., & Mangione, C. M. (2002). Do older adults expect to age successfully? The association between expectations regarding aging and beliefs regarding healthcare seeking among older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1837–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lang, F. R., Weiss, D., Gerstorf, D., & Wagner, G. G. (2013). Forecasting life satisfaction across adulthood: Benefits of seeing a dark future? Psychology and Aging, 28, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Conde-Sala, J. L., Portellano-Ortiz, C., Calvo-Perxas, L., & Garre-Olmo, J. (2017). Quality of life in people aged 65 + in Europe: Associated factors and models of social welfare-analysis of data from the SHARE project (Wave 5). Quality of Life Research, 26, 1059–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP)University of Lausanne Hospital CentreLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Service of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric RehabilitationUniversity of Lausanne Hospital CentreLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care and Emergency MedicineUniversity Hospital of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Pro Senectute VaudLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations