Psychometric properties and factorial analysis of invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in cancer patients
The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), evaluate the measurement invariance with respect to sex, age, and tumor location, as well as analyze associations between life satisfaction and socio-demographic and clinical variables among individuals with resected, non-advanced cancer.
A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to explore the dimensionality of the scale and test invariance across gender, age, and tumor localization in a prospective, multicenter cohort of 713 patients who completed the following scales: SWLS, Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18).
Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the SWLS is an essentially unidimensional instrument, providing accurate scores: both McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha estimates were 0.91. Strong measurement invariance was found to hold across gender, age, and tumor localization. Low satisfaction with life was associated with psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, and somatization), and decreased quality of life (malfunction, symptoms, poor global QoL).
The SWLS is a reliable, valid satisfaction with life measurement among people with cancer and should be recommended as an indicator of psychological adjustment in oncological patients.
KeywordsLife satisfaction Psychometric Invariance Cancer Quality of life
The authors would like to thank the investigators of the Neocoping study (coping, shared decision-making, and quality of life in patients with early-stage cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy) and the Supportive Care Working Group of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).
This work was funded by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) in 2015. The sponsor of this research has not participated in data collection, analysis, or interpretation, in writing the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
- 1.Ferlay, J., Steliarova-Foucher, E., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Rosso, S., Coebergh, J. W. W., Comber, H., … Bray, F. (2013). Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer, 49(6), 1374–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027.Google Scholar
- 2.Kvale, E. A., Huang, C.-H. S., Meneses, K. M., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Bae, S., Azuero, C. B., … Ritchie, C. S. (2016). Patient-centered support in the survivorship care transition: Outcomes from the patient-owned survivorship care plan intervention. Cancer, 122(20), 3232–3242. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30136.Google Scholar
- 4.Pendergrass, J. C., Targum, S. D., & Harrison, J. E. (2018). Cognitive impairment associated with cancer: A brief review. Innovations in clinical neuroscience, 15(1–2), 36–44.Google Scholar
- 8.Hinz, A., Conrad, I., Schroeter, M. L., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., Zenger, M., … Herzberg, P. Y. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample. Quality of Life Research, 0(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1844-1.Google Scholar
- 11.Dunn, J., Ng, S. K., Breitbart, W., Aitken, J., Youl, P., Baade, P. D., & Chambers, S. K. (2013). Health-related quality of life and life satisfaction in colorectal cancer survivors: Trajectories of adjustment. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11, 46.Google Scholar
- 14.Ashraf, A. A., Colakoglu, S., Nguyen, J. T., Anastasopulos, A. J., Ibrahim, A. M. S., Yueh, J. H., … Lee, B. T. (2013). Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Journal of Surgical Research, 184(1), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.057.Google Scholar
- 15.Vázquez, C., Rahona, J. J., Gómez, D., Caballero, F. F., & Hervás, G. (2015). A national representative study of the relative impact of physical and psychological problems on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 135–148.Google Scholar
- 17.He, Z.-Y., Tong, Q., Wu, S.-G., Li, F.-Y., Lin, H.-X., & Guan, X.-X. (2012). A comparison of quality of life and satisfaction of women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy vs. mastectomy in southern China. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(10), 2441–2449.Google Scholar
- 22.Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In N. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being (pp. 101–117). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 24.Bagherzadeh, M., Loewe, N., Mouawad, R. G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., Araya-Castillo, L., & Thieme, C. (2018). Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Validation and factorial invariance analysis in Chile. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.2.Google Scholar
- 25.Whisman, M. A., Judd, C. M., Whisman, M. A., & Judd, C. M. (2015). A Cross-National analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 239–244.Google Scholar
- 26.Derogatis, L. R. (2001). BSI 18, Brief symptom inventory 18: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc.Google Scholar
- 27.Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., … de Haes, J. C. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.Google Scholar
- 28.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’ss guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 31.Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, (2), 23–74.Google Scholar
- 32.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). RE Anderson multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- 34.Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492.Google Scholar
- 35.Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (2007). Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In R. Cudeck & R. C. MacCallum (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100 (pp. 131–152). Mahwah: LEA.Google Scholar
- 38.Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory. Retrieved from http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor.
- 40.Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C. M., Quinney, H. A., Fields, A. L. A., Jones, L. W., & Fairey, A. S. (2003). A randomized trial of exercise and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. European Journal of Cancer Care, 12(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00437.x.Google Scholar
- 41.Letourneau, J. M., Ebbel, E. E., Katz, P. P., Katz, A., Ai, W. Z., Chien, A. J., … Rosen, M. P. (2012). Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer, 118(6), 1710–1717. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26459.Google Scholar
- 42.Campbell, A., Mutrie, N., White, F., McGuire, F., & Kearney, N. (2005). A pilot study of a supervised group exercise programme as a rehabilitation treatment for women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 9(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2004.03.007.Google Scholar
- 44.Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & de Coelho, J. A. P. M (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0.Google Scholar
- 47.Merluzzi, T., & Martinez Sanchez, M. (2018). Husbands’ perceptions of their wives’ breast cancer coping efficacy: Testing congruence models of adjustment. Cancer Management and Research, 10, 297–304.Google Scholar