Advertisement

Causal attributions and their impact on psychosocial functioning in head and neck cancer patient–caregiver dyads: a preliminary, longitudinal study

  • Jessica L. Burris
  • Jessica N. Rivera-Rivera
  • Kent Armeson
  • Jane Zapka
  • Anthony J. Alberg
  • Terry A. Day
  • Katherine R. Sterba
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

This longitudinal study explores causal attributions in newly diagnosed head/neck cancer (HNC) patients and their caregivers.

Methods

Perceptions of causal attributions and associated level of responsibility regarding each patient’s HNC diagnosis at baseline (n = 72 dyads) were described and then tested as predictors of depressive symptoms, cancer worry, and perceived support 6 months later.

Results

When causes were reported, tobacco and alcohol use topped the list of both patients and caregivers. Three-quarters of dyads agreed about perceptions of the patients’ responsibility in causing their HNC. Some dyad-level patterns of causal attribution were associated with patients’ and caregivers’ cancer worry (p < 0.05) and caregivers’ perceived support (p < 0.05) in unadjusted models.

Conclusions

This preliminary study indicates that causal attributions warrant further exploration in HNC patient–caregiver dyads specifically, as well as studies of quality of life in patient–caregiver dyads more broadly considered.

Keywords

Cancer Causal attributions Distress Dyads Social support 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge data collection and recruitment support from Rebecca Patten, OT, Lee Anne Tetrick, BS and Amy Buchanan, MPH, RD. This work was supported by the American Cancer Society [MRSG-12-221-01-CPPB]; the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000062]; and the National Cancer Institute [P30 CA138313, K07 CA181351]. Its content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Cancer Society or National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This research was supported by the American Cancer Society [MRSG-12-221-01-CPPB]; the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000062]; and the National Cancer Institute [P30 CA138313, K07 CA181351]. Its content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Cancer Society or National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. 1.
    Sturgis, E. M., Wei, Q., & Spitz, M. R. (2004). Descriptive epidemiology and risk factors for head and neck cancer. Seminars in Oncology, 31, 726–733.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scharloo, M., Baatenburg de Jong, R. J., Langeveld, T. P. M., van Velzen-Verkaik, E.,, M. M., & Kaptein, A. A. (2005). Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer. Head and Neck, 27, 857–863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen, A. J., Moran, P. J., Ehlers, S. L., Raichle, K., Karnell, L., & Funk, G. (1999). Smoking and drinking behavior in patients with head and neck cancer: Effects of behavioral self-blame and perceived control. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 407–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murphy, B. A., & Deng, J. (2015). Advances in supportive care for late effects of head and neck cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33, 3314–3322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ringash, J. (2015). Survivorship and quality of life in head and neck cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33, 3322–3328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sterba, K. R., Zapka, J., Cranos, C., Laursen, A., & Day, T. A. (2016). Quality of life in head and neck cancer patient–caregiver dyads: A systematic review. Cancer Nursing, 39, 238–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sterba, K. R., Zapka, J., Armeson, K. E., Shirai, K., Buchanan, A., Day, T. A., & Alberg, T. A. (2017). Physical and emotional well-being and support in newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patient–caregiver dyads. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 35, 646–665.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Chou, C., Harle, M. T., Morrissey, M., et al. (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients. Cancer, 89, 1634–1646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irwin, M., Artin, K. H., & Oxman, M. N. (1999). Screening for depression in the older adult: Criterion validity of the 10-Item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 1701–1704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gotay, C. C., & Pagano, I. S. (2007). Assessment of survivor concerns (ASC): A newly proposed brief questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 37–67.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McBride, C. M., Emmons, K. M., & Lipkus, I. M. (2003). Understanding the potential of teachable moments for motivating smoking cessation. Health Education Research, 18, 156–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin, D. W., Park, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Park, E. W., Yang, H. K., Ahn, E., et al. (2014). Guilt, censure, and concealment of active smoking status among cancer patients and family members after diagnosis: A nationwide study. Psycho-Oncology, 23, 585–591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milbury, K., Badr, H., & Carmack, C. L. (2012). The role of blame in the psychosocial adjustment of couples coping with lung cancer. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44, 331–340.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Traa, M. J., De Vries, J., Bodenmann, G., & Oudsten, D., B. L (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 85–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carney, L. M., & Parl, C. L. (2018). Cancer survivors’ understanding of the cause and cure of their illness: Religious and secural appraisals. Psycho-Oncology, 27, 1553–1558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gall, T. L., & Billodeau, C. (2017). “Why me?” Women’s use of spiritual causal attributions in making sense of breast cancer. Psychology and Health, 32, 709–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salander, P. (2007). Attributions of lung cancer: My own illness is hardly caused by smoking. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 587–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrucci, L. M., Cartmel, B., Turkman, Y. E., Murphy, M. E., Smith, T., Stein, K. D., et al. (2011). Causal attributions among cancer survivors of the ten most common cancers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 29, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caruso, V., Daniela, G. M., & Lara, G. (2014). Quality of life and uncertainty in illness for chronic patients. Mediterrean Journal of Clinical Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2014.2.990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bailey, D. E., Landerman, L., Barroso, J., Bixby, P., Mishel, M. H., Muir, A. J., et al. (2009). Uncertainty, symptoms and quality of life in persons with chronic hepatitis c undergoing watchful waiting. Psychosomatics, 50, 138–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Price, A., Goodwin, L., Rayner, L., Shaw, E., Hansford, P., Sykes, N., et al. (2012). Illness perceptions, adjustment to illness, and depression in a palliative care population. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43, 819–932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pasipanodya, E. C., Parrish, B. P., Laurenceau, J.-P., Cohen, L. H., Siegel, S. D., Graber, E. C., et al. (2012). Social constraints on disclosure predict daily well-being in couples coping with early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 661–667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy, B. A., Ridner, S., Wells, N., & Dietrich, M. (2007). Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: A review of the current state of the science. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 62, 251–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Markey Cancer CenterUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer CenterMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology and Hollings Cancer CenterMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations