Advertisement

Quality of life of persons living with HIV and congruence with surrogate decision-makers

  • Katherine B. Curtin
  • Yao I. Cheng
  • Jichuan Wang
  • Rachel K. Scott
  • Leah Squires
  • Debra A. Benator
  • Maureen E. Lyon
  • for the Palliative Care Consortiums
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Physicians and caregivers rate patient quality of life (QOL) lower than patients rate their own QOL. This study investigated discrepancies between self-assessments of patient QOL by adults with HIV and their surrogate decision-makers.

Methods

We collected baseline data from 223 adult dyads in the FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning (ACP) clinical trial, consisting of HIV positive patients and their chosen surrogates. Participants independently completed the Medical Outcome Study-HIV Survey (MOS-HIV) and the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS). We used Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test to assess differences in overall patient–surrogate means. We used Prevalence Adjusted Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) statistics to assess dyadic agreement, with surrogate HIV status and cohabitation status as grouping variables.

Results

Patients were 56.1% male, 86.1% Black/African-American, aged 22–77 (mean = 50.83, SD = ± 12.33). Surrogates were 43.8% male, 84.1% Black/African-American, aged 18–82 (mean = 49.73, SD = ± 14.22). 46.2% of surrogates lived with the patient. 64.6% of surrogates reported negative HIV status. Surrogates were more likely to state patients were ill, p = 0.032. Among patient–surrogate dyads, most QOL assessments showed poor (0.00–0.39) or fair (0.40–0.59) agreement and agreement tended to be even poorer among patient–surrogate dyads where the surrogate had a shared HIV diagnosis.

Conclusions

QOL discrepancies are said to arise from healthy surrogates overestimating the effects of chronic illness. In this novel assessment, many surrogates had a shared HIV diagnosis, without increased agreement. These findings highlight the challenge of accurately assessing patient QOL by surrogates, even when there is a shared HIV diagnosis. Improved communication is needed between patients and surrogates about the patients’ representation of illness.

National Clinical Trial Number: NCT01775436.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Health-related quality of life Caregivers Medical decision-making Advance care planning Disability paradox 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants for their contributions to the success of this study.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research at the National Institute of Health Award Number R01NR014-052-05; National Institute of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences CTSI-CN UL1RR031988. These institutions were not involved in the present analysis, the interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit for publication. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Nursing Research or the National Institute of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This research was approved by the IRB at Children’s National (coordinating center) and at all participating study sites. The Children’s National Medical Center IRB’s Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) number is FWA00004487. The institutional organization number is IORG0000245.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Schouten, J., Ferdinand, W. W., Stolte, I. G., Kootstra, N., van der Valk, M., & Geerlings, S. G. (2014). Cross-sectional comparison of the prevalence of age-associated comorbidities and their risk factors between HIV-infected and uninfected individuals: The AGE IV cohort study. Clinical Infectious Diseases.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henderson, W. A., Schlenk, E. A., Kim, K. H., Hadigan, C. M., Martino, A. C., & Sereika, S. M. (2010). Validation of the MOS-HIV as a measure of health-related quality of life in persons living with HIV and liver disease. AIDS Care, 22(4), 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wegner, N. S., Kanouse, D. E., Collins, R. L., Liu, H., Schuster, M. A., & Gifford, A. L. (2001). End-of-life discussions and preferences among persons with HIV. JAMA, 285(22), 2880–2890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ubel, P. A., Schwarz, N., Loewenstein, G., & Smith, D. (2005). Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S57–S62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krug, R., Karus, D., Selwyn, P. A., & Raveis, V. H. (2010). Late-stage HIV/AIDS patients’ and their familial caregivers’ agreement on the palliative care outcome scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Higginson, I. J., & Gao, W. (2008). Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: Concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(1), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, Y., & Rapkin, B. (2009). Classification and regression tree uncovered hierarchy of psychosocial determinants underlying quality-of-life response shift in HIV/AIDS. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(11), 1138–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carona, C., Pereira, M., Moreira, H., Silva, N., & Canavarro, M. C. (2013). The disability paradox revisited: Quality of life and family caregiving in pediatric cerebral palsy. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(7), 971–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, W. W., Zack, M. M., Krahn, G. L., Andresen, E. M., & Barile, J. P. (2012). Health-related quality of life among older adults with and without functional limitations. American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folkman, S., & Greer, S. (2000). Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: When theory, research and practice inform each other. Psychooncology, 9(1), 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson, S. C., Sobolew-Shubin, A., Galbraith, M. E., Schwankovsky, L., & Cruzen, D. (1993). Maintaining perceptions of control: Finding perceived control in low-control circumstances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarakeshwar, N., Vanderwerker, L. C., Paulk, E., Pearce, M. J., Kasl, S. V., & Prigerson, H. G. (2006). Religious coping is associated with the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2001). Religious struggle as a predictor of mortality among medically ill elderly patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(15), 1881–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, C. C., Czaja, S. J., & Schulz, R. (2010). The moderating influence of demographic characteristics, social support, and religious coping on the effectiveness of a multicomponent psychosocial caregiver intervention in three racial ethnic groups. Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 65B(2),185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2004). Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(6), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mercurio, M. R. (2007). An adolescent’s refusal of medical treatment: Implications of the Abraham Cheerix case. Pediatrics, 120, 1357–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fins, J., & Schiff, N. (2005). In brief: The afterlife of Terri Schiavo. The Hastings Center Report, 35, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wijngaards-de Meij, L., Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2008). Parents grieving the loss of their child: Interdependence in coping. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammes, B. J., Klevan, J., Kempf, M., & Williams, M. S. (2005). Pediatric advance care planning. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8, 766–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wissow, L. S., Hutton, N., & Kass, N. (2001). Preliminary study of a values-history advance directive interview in a pediatric HIV clinic. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 12(2), 161–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hammes, B. J., & Briggs, L. (2007). Respecting choices: Advance care planning facilitator manual-revised. La Crosse: Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Curtis, J. R., Patrick, D. L., Caldwell, E., Greenlee, H., & Collier, A. C. (1999). The quality of patient-doctor communication about end-of-life care: A study of patients with advanced AIDS and their primary care clinicians. AIDS, 13(9), 1123–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kimmel, A. L., Wang, J., Scott, R., Briggs, L., & Lyon, M. E. (2015). FAmily CEntered (FACE) advance care planning: Study design and methods for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for patients with HIV/AIDS and their surrogate decision-makers. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 43(1), 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu, A. W., Revicki, D. A., Jacobson, D., & Malitz, F. E. (1997). Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV). Quality of Life Research, 6(6), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aspinal, F., Hughes, R., Higginson, I., Chidgey, J., Drescher, U., & Thompson, M. (2002). A user’s guide to the Palliative care Outcome Scale (p. 10). London: Palliative Care and Policy Publications.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1999). Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: The Palliative care Outcome Scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group. British Medical Journal of Quality & Safety, 8(4), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS® 9.2 enhanced logging facilities. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Drum, C. E., Horner-Johnson, W., & Krahn, G. L. (2008). Self-rated health and health days: Examining the “disability paradox”. Disability and Health Journal, 1(2), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Graham, C. D., Weinman, J., Sadjadi, R., Chalder, T., Petty, R., & Hanna, M. G. (2014). A multicentre postal survey investigating the contribution of illness perceptions, coping and optimism to quality of life and mood in adults with muscle disease. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(5), 508–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ashton, E., Vosvick, M., & Chesney, M. (2005). Social support and maladaptive coping as predictors of change in physical health symptoms among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Patient Care STDs, 19(9), 587–598.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2005.19.587.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Med, 7(7), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyon, M. E., Squires, L., D’Angelo, L., Benator, D., Scott, R., Tanjutco, P., et al. (2017, September 6–8). Advance care planning needs of persons living with HIV/AIDS in Washington, DC: A racial comparison. In Poster 6th international advance care planning end of life conference, Banff, Alberta.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Detering, K. M., Hancock, A. D., Reade, M. C., & Silvester, W. (2010). The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Song, M. K., Ward, S. E., Denne, H., Happ, M. B., Piraino, B., Donovan, H. S., et al. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of SPIRIT: An effective approach to preparing African-American dialysis patients and families for end-of-life. Research in Nursing & Health, 32(3), 260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine B. Curtin
    • 1
    • 8
  • Yao I. Cheng
    • 1
  • Jichuan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rachel K. Scott
    • 3
  • Leah Squires
    • 4
    • 5
  • Debra A. Benator
    • 6
    • 7
  • Maureen E. Lyon
    • 1
    • 2
  • for the Palliative Care Consortiums
  1. 1.Children’s National Health SystemChildren’s Research Institute, Center for Translational ScienceWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The George Washington School of Medicine and Health SciencesWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Medstar Health Research Institute/Washington Hospital CenterWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.Psychology ServiceDC Veterans Affairs Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  6. 6.Division of Infectious Diseases SectionThe George Washington University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  7. 7.Infectious Diseases SectionVeterans Affairs Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  8. 8.Department of Somatic PsychologyCalifornia Institute of Integral StudiesSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations