Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 2243–2250 | Cite as

WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 is related to upper and lower extremity disease-specific quality of life

  • Jun-Il Yoo
  • Jin-Sung Park
  • Rock-Beum Kim
  • Ae-Rim Seo
  • Young-Jin Park
  • Mi-Ji Kim
  • Ki Soo ParkEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated whether two disease-specific quality of life instruments (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, DASH and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC) reflect a patient’s perception of general disability using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and determined whether disability components are explained by upper and lower extremity HRQOL.

Methods

We recruited 421 participants, 50 years or older without stroke, cancer, or history of surgery for musculoskeletal disease, who participated in the NAMGARAM Cohort. Upper extremity HRQOL was determined with the DASH score and lower extremity HRQOL with the WOMAC; as a measure of disability, we obtained WHODAS 2.0 component. Multiple regression modeling was used to assess the relative contributions made by upper and lower extremity HRQOL to disability.

Results

When adjusted for covariates, the DASH total score was correlated with getting around (β = 0.217, p < 0.001) and social participation (β = 0.226, p < 0.001), and the WOMAC total score was correlated with getting around (β = 0.363, p < 0.001), life activation (β = 0.363, p < 0.001), and social participation (β = 0.301, p < 0.001). QOL significantly correlated with upper extremity disorders (β = 0.081, p = 0.018) or lower extremity disorders (β = 0.095 p = 0.004).

Conclusion

We found that in a community-based population, perceived activity limitation and social participation were associated with upper and lower extremity HRQOL. Since the WHODAS 2.0 does not target a specific disease (as opposed to DASH and WOMAC), it can be used to compare disabilities caused by different diseases.

Keywords

Disability Lower extremity Quality of life Upper extremity WHO 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by a grant of the Center for Farmer’s Safety and Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bingefors, K., & Isacson, D. (2004). Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain: A gender perspective. European Journal of Pain, 8(5), 435–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawrence, R. C., Helmick, C. G., Arnett, F. C., Deyo, R. A., Felson, D. T., Giannini, E. H., et al. (1998). Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 41(5), 778–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States (BMUS) 3rd Edition (Dated 12.31.16).pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.boneandjointburden.org/docs/The%20Burden%20of%20Musculoskeletal%20Diseases%20in%20the%20United%20States%20%28BMUS%29%203rd%20Edition%20%28Dated%2012.31.16%29.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Dieppe, P. A. (2005). Relationship between symptoms and structural change in osteoarthritis: What are the important targets for therapy? The Journal of Rheumatology, 32(6), 1147–1149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furner, S. E., Hootman, J. M., Helmick, C. G., Bolen, J., & Zack, M. M. (2011). Health-related quality of life of US adults with arthritis: Analysis of data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2003, 2005, and 2007. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(6), 788–799.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, G., Zacherl, M., Giessauf, C., Glehr, M., Fuerst, F., Liebmann, W., et al. (2010). Quality of life after volar plate fixation of articular fractures of the distal part of the radius. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92(5), 1170–1178.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menz, H. B., Roddy, E., Thomas, E., & Croft, P. R. (2011). Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(3), 396–404.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ostendorf, M., van Stel, H. F., Buskens, E., Schrijvers, A. J. P., Marting, L. N., Verbout, A. J., et al. (2004). Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86(6), 801–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SooHoo, N. F., McDonald, A. P., Seiler, J. G., & McGillivary, G. R. (2002). Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27(3), 537–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bae, S. C., Lee, H. S., Yun, H. R., Kim, T.-H., Yoo, D.-H., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne Osteoarthritis Indices for Clinical Research. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9(8), 746–750.  https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2001.0471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lim, J. Y., Lee, H. Y., Song, J. H., Kang, J. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2005). Evaluation of the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Korean version of the DASH. The Journal of the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand, 10(4), 192–198.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kutlay, Ş, Küçükdeveci, A. A., Elhan, A. H., Öztuna, D., Koç, N., & Tennant, A. (2011). Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology International, 31(3), 339–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, J. M., Stewart, R., Glozier, N., Prince, M., Kim, S. W., Yang, S. J., et al. (2005). Physical health, depression and cognitive function as correlates of disability in an older Korean population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 160–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silva, C., Coleta, I., Silva, A. G., Amaro, A., Alvarelhao, J., Queiros, A., et al. (2013). Adaptacao e validacao do WHODAS 2.0 em utentes com dor musculoesqueletica. Revista de Saúde Pública, 47(4), 752–758.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zheng, Q. L., Tian, Q., Hao, C., Gu, J., Lucas-Carrasco, R., Tao, J. T., et al. (2014). The role of quality of care and attitude towards disability in the relationship between severity of disability and quality of life: Findings from a cross-sectional survey among people with physical disability in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roux, C. H., Guillemin, F., Boini, S., Longuetaud, F., Arnault, N., Hercberg, S., et al. (2005). Impact of musculoskeletal disorders on quality of life: An inception cohort study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(4), 606–611.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.020784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuperus, N., Vlieland, T. P., Mahler, E. A., Kersten, C. C., Hoogeboom, T. J., & van den Ende, C. H. (2015). The clinical burden of generalized osteoarthritis represented by self-reported health-related quality of life and activity limitations: A cross-sectional study. Rheumatology International, 35(5), 871–877.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3149-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kwok, W. Y., Vlieland, V., Rosendaal, F. R., Huizinga, T. W., & Kloppenburg, M. (2011). Limitations in daily activities are the major determinant of reduced health-related quality of life in patients with hand osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 70(2), 334–336.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.133603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun-Il Yoo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Jin-Sung Park
    • 3
  • Rock-Beum Kim
    • 4
  • Ae-Rim Seo
    • 4
  • Young-Jin Park
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mi-Ji Kim
    • 4
  • Ki Soo Park
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryGyeongsang National University HospitalJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Institute of Health Sciences, College of MedicineGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, College of MedicineGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, College of MedicineGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  5. 5.Center for Farmer’s Safety and HealthGyeongsang National University HospitalJinjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations