Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 2421–2434 | Cite as

Impact of marital status and comorbid disorders on health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery

  • Ann Kristin BjørnnesEmail author
  • Monica Parry
  • Ragnhild Falk
  • Judy Watt-Watson
  • Irene Lie
  • Marit Leegaard
Article

Abstract

Purpose

To explore associations between HRQL, marital status, and comorbid disorders in men and women following cardiac surgery.

Method

A secondary analysis was completed using data from a randomized controlled trial in which 416 individuals (23% women) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery were recruited between March 2012 and September 2013. HRQL was assessed using the Health State Descriptive System (15D) preoperatively, then at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following cardiac surgery. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to explore associations between HRQL, social support, and comorbid disorders.

Results

The overall 15D scores for the total sample improved significantly from 2 weeks to 3 months post surgery, with only a gradual change observed from 3 to 12 months. Thirty percent (n = 92) of the total sample reported a lower 15D total score at 12 months compared to preoperative status, of whom 78% (n = 71) had a negative minimum important differences (MID), indicating a worse HRQL status. When adjusted for age and marital status, women had statistically significant lower 15D total scores compared to men at 3, 6, and 12 months post surgery. Compared to pre-surgery, improvement was demonstrated in 4 out of 15 dimensions of HRQL for women, and in 6 out of 15 dimensions for men at 12 months post surgery. Both men and women associated back/neck problems, depression, and persistent pain intensity with lower HRQL; for women, not living with a partner/spouse was associated with lower HRQL up to 12 months.

Conclusion

Women experienced decreased HRQL and a slower first-year recovery following cardiac surgery compared to men. This study demonstrates a need for follow-up and support to help women manage their symptoms and improve their function within the first year after cardiac surgery. This was particularly pronounced for those women living alone.

Keywords

Health-related quality of life Cardiac surgery Gender differences Marital status Social support Comorbidity 

Notes

Funding

Grant support from South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2012030).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethics approval was obtained from Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Eastern Norway (no. 2011/2012 A) and Social Science Data Services at Oslo University Hospital (no. 2012/16916). Clinical Trials gov Identifier: NCT01976403.

Informed consent

All eligible participants received oral and written information about the study and provided written informed consent to participate. Participants were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time during the study period without giving reasons.

References

  1. 1.
    Buth, K. J., Gainer, R. A., Legare, J. F., & Hirsch, G. M. (2014). The changing face of cardiac surgery: Practice patterns and outcomes 2001-2010. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 30(2), 224–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krishnaswami, A., Go, A. S., Forman, D. E., Leong, T. K., Lee, H., Maurer, M. S., et al. (2016). Multimorbidity is strongly associated with long-term but not short-term mortality after cardiac valve replacement. International Journal of Cardiology, 215, 417–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., et al. (2016). Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 133(4), 447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohr, F. W., Morice, M. C., Kappetein, A. P., Feldman, T. E., Ståhle, E., Colombo, A., et al. (2013). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. The Lancet, 381(9867), 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moazzami, K., Dolmatova, E., Maher, J., Gerula, C., Sambol, J., Klapholz, M., et al. (2016). In-hospital outcome and complications of coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States between 2008 and 2012. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 31(1), 19–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaspar, M., & Călinescu, F. B. (2016). Long-term clinical outcome following CABG. Coronary graft failure (pp. 199–215). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sabbag, A., Matetzky, S., Gottlieb, S., Fefer, P., Kohanov, O., Atar, S., et al. (2015). Recent temporal trends in the presentation, management, and outcome of women hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. The American Journal of Medicine, 128(4), 380–388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurfirst, V., Mokráček, A., Krupauerová, M., Čanádyová, J., Bulava, A., Pešl, L., et al. (2014). Health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery-the effects of age, preoperative conditions and postoperative complications. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 9(1), 46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nugteren, L. B., & Sandau, K. E. (2010). Critical review of health-related quality of life studies of patients with aortic stenosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(1), 25–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parry, M., Arthur, H., Brooks, D., Groll, D., & Pavlov, A. (2012). Measuring function in older adults with co-morbid illnesses who are undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 54(3), 477–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sibilitz, K. L., Berg, S. K., Thygesen, L. C., Hansen, T. B., Køber, L., Hassager, C., et al. (2015). High readmission rate after heart valve surgery: A nationwide cohort study. International Journal of Cardiology, 189, 96–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kloth, B., Schietsch, O., Sill, B., Schönebeck, J., Reichenspurner, H., & Gulbins, H. (2016). Does cardiac surgery affect quality of life? An update of more than 200 patients. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 64(S01), ePP21.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grady, K. L., Lee, R., Subačius, H., Malaisrie, S. C., McGee, E. C., Kruse, J., et al. (2011). Improvements in health-related quality of life before and after isolated cardiac operations. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 91(3), 777–783. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Smedt, D., Clays, E., & De Bacquer, D. (2016). Measuring health-related quality of life in cardiac patients. European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw015.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guimarães-Pereira, L., Farinha, F., Azevedo, L., Abelha, F., & Castro-Lopes, J. (2016). Persistent postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: Incidence, characterization, associated factors and its impact in quality of life. European Journal of Pain. doi: 10.1002/ejp.866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Middel, B., El Baz, N., Pedersen, S. S., Van Dijk, J. P., Wynia, K., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2014). Decline in health-related quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The influence of anxiety, depression, and personality traits. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 29(6), 544–554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Annemans, L., Pardaens, S., Kotseva, K., & De Bacquer, D. (2015). Self-reported health status in coronary heart disease patients: A comparison with the general population. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 14(2), 117–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rumsfeld, J. S., Alexander, K. P., Goff, D. C., Graham, M. M., Ho, P. M., Masoudi, F. A., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular health: The importance of measuring patient-reported health status. Circulation, 127(22), 2233–2249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oterhals, K., Hanssen, T. A., Haaverstad, R., Nordrehaug, J. E., Eide, G. E., & Norekval, T. M. (2015). Factors associated with poor self-reported health status after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant bypass surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 48(2), 283–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peric, V., Borzanovic, M., Stolic, R., Jovanovic, A., Sovtic, S., Djikic, D., et al. (2010). Quality of life in patients related to gender differences before and after coronary artery bypass surgery. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 10(2), 232–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin, L. M., Holmes, S. D., Henry, L. L., Schlauch, K. A., Stone, L. E., Roots, A., et al. (2012). Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and the role of gender. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Including Molecular Interventions, 13(6), 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McSweeney, J. C., Rosenfeld, A. G., Abel, W. M., Braun, L. T., Burke, L. E., Daugherty, S. L., et al. (2016). Preventing and experiencing ischemic heart disease as a woman: State of the science a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 133(13), 1302–1331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Westerman, S., & Wenger, N. K. (2016). Women and heart disease, the underrecognized burden: Sex differences, biases, and unmet clinical and research challenges. Clinical Science, 130(8), 551–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beckie, T. M. (2014). Biopsychosocial determinants of health and quality of life among young women with coronary heart disease. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 8(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peric, V., Jovanovic-Markovic, S., Peric, D., Rasic, D., Novakovic, T., Dejanovic, B., et al. (2015). Quality of life in patients of different age groups before and after coronary artery by-pass surgery. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 21(5), 474–480.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Romero, P. S., Souza, E. N., Rodrigues, J., & Moraes, M. A. (2015). Changes in quality of life associated with surgical risk in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(5), 592–597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baig, K., Harling, L., Papanikitas, J., Attaran, S., Ashrafian, H., Casula, R., et al. (2013). Does coronary artery bypass grafting improve quality of life in elderly patients? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 17(3), 542–553.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shan, L., Saxena, A., McMahon, R., & Newcomb, A. (2013). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the elderly a review of postoperative quality of life. Circulation, 128(21), 2333–2343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hokkanen, M., Järvinen, O., Huhtala, H., & Tarkka, M. R. (2014). A 12-year follow-up on the changes in health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 45(2), 329–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Christiansen, J., Larsen, F. B., & Lasgaard, M. (2016). Do stress, health behavior, and sleep mediate the association between loneliness and adverse health conditions among older people? Social Science and Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manfredini, R., De Giorgi, A., Tiseo, R., Boari, B., Cappadona, R., Salmi, R., et al. (2017). Marital status, cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular risk factors: A review of the evidence. Journal of Women’s Health. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Noyez, L. (2014). Is quality of life post cardiac surgery overestimated? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horrocks, J., Closs, J., & Astin, F. (2014). Quality of life in older adults with aortic stenosis: A narrative review. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 9(3), 227–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Höfer, S., Oldridge, N., Kotseva, K., Maggioni, A. P., et al. (2016). The use of HeartQoL in patients with coronary heart disease: Association with risk factors and European reference values. The EUROASPIRE IV study of the European Society of Cardiology. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. doi: 10.1177/2047487316631400.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vartiainen, P., Heiskanen, T., Sintonen, H., Roine, R. P., & Kalso, E. (2016). Health-related quality of life and burden of disease in chronic pain measured with the 15D instrument. Pain, 157(10), 2269–2276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heiskanen, J., Tolppanen, A.-M., Roine, R. P., Hartikainen, J., Hippeläinen, M., Miettinen, H., et al. (2016). Comparison of EQ-5D and 15D instruments for assessing the health-related quality of life in cardiac surgery patients. European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw002.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vainiola, T., Roine, R. P., Suojaranta-Ylinen, R., Vento, A., & Sintonen, H. (2013). Can factors related to mortality be used to predict the follow-up health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cardiac surgery patients? Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 29(6), 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rantanen, A., Tarkka, M. T., Kaunonen, M., Tarkka, M., Sintonen, H., Koivisto, A. M., et al. (2009). Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(9), 1926–1936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alanne, S., Roine, R. P., Räsänen, P., Vainiola, T., & Sintonen, H. (2014). Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores. Quality of Life Research, 24(3), 599–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kattainen, E., Merilainen, P., & Sintonen, H. (2006). Sense of coherence and health-related quality of life among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 5(1), 21–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stenvall, H., Tierala, I., Räsänen, P., Laine, M., Sintonen, H., & Roine, R. P. (2017). Long-term clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life and costs in different treatment modalities of stable coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 3(1), 74–82. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bjornnes, A. K., Parry, M., Lie, I., Fagerland, M. W., Watt-Watson, J., Rustoen, T., et al. (2017). The impact of an educational pain management booklet intervention on postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(1), 18–27. doi: 10.1177/1474515116631680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sintonen, H. (2001). The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: Properties and applications. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 328–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sangha, O., Stucki, G., Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Katz, J. N. (2003). The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(2), 156–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    De-loyde, K. J., Harrison, J. D., Durcinoska, I., Shepherd, H. L., Solomon, M. J., & Young, J. M. (2015). Which information source is best? Concordance between patient report, clinician report and medical records of patient co-morbidity and adjuvant therapy health information. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(2), 339–346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: Global use of the brief pain inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(2), 129–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Borchgrevink, P. C., Mendoza, T. R., Cleeland, C. S., & Kaasa, S. (2002). The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: Translation and validation in cancer pain patients. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 24(5), 517–525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gjeilo, K. H., Stenseth, R., Wahba, A., Lydersen, S., & Klepstad, P. (2007). Validation of the brief pain inventory in patients six months after cardiac surgery. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 648–656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stata, S. (2013). Release 13. Statistical software. College Station, Texas: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011). Applied longitudinal analysis (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bjornnes, A. K., Parry, M., Lie, I., Fagerland, M. W., Watt-Watson, J., Rustoen, T., et al. (2016). Pain experiences of men and women after cardiac surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(19–20), 3058–3068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Choiniere, M., Watt-Watson, J., Victor, J. C., Baskett, R. J., Bussieres, J. S., Carrier, M., et al. (2014). Prevalence of and risk factors for persistent postoperative nonanginal pain after cardiac surgery: A 2-year prospective multicentre study. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186(7), E213–E223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rantanen, A., Kaunonen, M., Tarkka, M., Sintonen, H., Koivisto, A.-M., Astedt-Kurki, P., et al. (2009). Patients’ and significant others’ health-related quality of life one month after coronary artery bypass grafting predicts later health-related quality of life. Heart and Lung, 38(4), 318–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Saarni, S. I., Harkanen, T., Sintonen, H., Suvisaari, J., Koskinen, S., Aromaa, A., et al. (2006). The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: A general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 15(8), 1403–1414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hu, Y., van Lenthe, F. J., Borsboom, G. J., Looman, C. W. N., Bopp, M., Burström, B., et al. (2016). Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 17 European countries between 1990 and 2010. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206780.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gunn, J. M., Lautamäki, A. K., Hirvonen, J., & Kuttila, K. T. (2014). The prognostic significance of declining health-related quality of life scores at 6 months after coronary artery bypass surgery. QJM: Monthly Journal of The Association of Physicians, 107(5), 369–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hansen, T. B., Thygesen, L. C., Zwisler, A. D., Helmark, L., Hoogwegt, M., Versteeg, H., et al. (2015). Self-reported health-related quality of life predicts 5-year mortality and hospital readmissions in patients with ischaemic heart disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(7), 882–889.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sethares, K. A., Chin, E., & Costa, I. (2013). Pain intensity, interference and patient pain management strategies the first 12 weeks after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Applied Nursing Research, 26(4), 174–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Parry, M., Watt-Watson, J., Hodnett, E., Tranmer, J., Dennis, C. L., & Brooks, D. (2010). Pain experiences of men and women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(3), E9–E15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Banack, H. R., Holly, C. D., Lowensteyn, I., Masse, L., Marchand, S., Grover, S. A., et al. (2014). The association between sleep disturbance, depressive symptoms, and health-related quality of life among cardiac rehabilitation participants. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 34(3), 188–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bjornnes, A. K., Rustoen, T., Lie, I., Watt-Watson, J., & Leegaard, M. (2016). Pain characteristics and analgesic intake before and following cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(1), 47–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Katz, J., Weinrib, A., Fashler, S., Katznelzon, R., Shah, B., Ladak, S., et al. (2015). The Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service: Development and implementation of a multidisciplinary program to prevent chronic postsurgical pain. Journal of Pain Research, 8, 695–702. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S91924.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Meissner, W., Coluzzi, F., Fletcher, D., Huygen, F., Morlion, B., Neugebauer, E., et al. (2015). Improving the management of post-operative acute pain: Priorities for change. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 31(11), 2131–2143. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1092122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Valderas, J. M., Starfield, B., Sibbald, B., Salisbury, C., & Roland, M. (2009). Defining comorbidity: Implications for understanding health and health services. The Annals of Family Medicine, 7(4), 357–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gjeilo, K. H., Klepstad, P., Wahba, A., Lydersen, S., & Stenseth, R. (2010). Chronic pain after cardiac surgery: A prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 54(1), 70–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gijsberts, C. M., Agostoni, P., Hoefer, I. E., Asselbergs, F. W., Pasterkamp, G., Nathoe, H., et al. (2015). Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Open Heart, 2(1), e000231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Leegaard, M., & Fagermoen, M. S. (2008). Patients’ key experiences after coronary artery bypass grafting: A synthesis of qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 22(4), 616–628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Choinière, M., Dion, D., Peng, P., Banner, R., Barton, P. M., Boulanger, A., et al. (2010). The Canadian STOP-PAIN project–Part 1: Who are the patients on the waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities? Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 57(6), 539–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bartley, E. J., & Fillingim, R. B. (2013). Sex differences in pain: A brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Brithish Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(1), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Idler, E. L., Boulifard, D. A., & Contrada, R. J. (2012). Mending broken hearts marriage and survival following cardiac surgery. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(1), 33–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Staniute, M., Brozaitiene, J., & Bunevicius, R. (2013). Effects of social support and stressful life events on health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28(1), 83–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zebhauser, A., Baumert, J., Emeny, R., Ronel, J., Peters, A., & Ladwig, K. (2015). What prevents old people living alone from feeling lonely? Findings from the KORA-Age-study. Aging & Mental Health, 19(9), 773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Parry, M., & Watt-Watson, J. (2010). Peer support intervention trials for individuals with heart disease: A systematic review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 9(1), 57–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dear, B. F., Gandy, M., Karin, E., Staples, L. G., Johnston, L., Fogliati, V. J., et al. (2015). The pain course: A randomised controlled trial examining an internet-delivered pain management program when provided with different levels of clinician support. Pain, 156(10), 1920–1935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Licskai, C., Sands, T., & Ferrone, M. (2013). Development and pilot testing of a mobile health solution for asthma self-management: Asthma action plan smartphone application pilot study. Canadian Respirology Journal, 20(4), 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bratt, E. L., & Moons, P. (2015). Forty years of quality-of-life research in congenital heart disease: Temporal trends in conceptual and methodological rigor. International Journal of Cardiology, 195, 1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Annemans, L., Doyle, F., Kotseva, K., Pająk, A., et al. (2013). Health related quality of life in coronary patients and its association with their cardiovascular risk profile: Results from the EUROASPIRE III survey. International Journal of Cardiology, 168(2), 898–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Yang, K., & Victor, C. (2011). Age and loneliness in 25 European nations. Ageing & Society, 31(08), 1368–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Norris, C. M., Johnson, N. L., Hardwicke-Brown, E., McEwan, M., Pelletier, R., & Pilote, L. (2017). The contribution of gender to apparent sex differences in health status among patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Women’s Health, 26(1), 50–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Day, S., Mason, R., Lagosky, S., & Rochon, P. A. (2016). Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of NursingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and DevelopmentOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support ServicesOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  4. 4.Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ullevål/Center for Patient Centered Heart- and Lung ResearchOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  5. 5.Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of NursingOslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations