Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 2519–2531 | Cite as

Development and initial validation of a short three-dimensional inventory of character strengths

  • Wenjie DuanEmail author
  • He Bu
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Character strength is described as a positive and organized pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. It serves as a schema that organizes categories of information toward the self, others, and the world, and provides the self-aware knowledge that facilitates the pursuit of goals, values, and ethical principles. Recent research has suggested that three reliable factors emerge from the measures of character strengths: caring, inquisitiveness, and self-control. The goal of this paper is to develop a psychometrically sound short measure of character strength.

Methods

The questions were addressed in two studies using two independent samples: a cross-cultural (i.e., 518 Asians and 556 Westerners) sample, and a cross-population (i.e., 175 community participants and 171 inpatients) sample in China.

Results

Findings from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis suggested a cross-cultural three-factor model of character strength that could be measured by the Three-dimensional Inventory of Character Strengths (TICS). A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis further indicated that the number of factors and factor loadings was invariant in the medical and community samples. This result indicated that the brief inventory could be applied to a medical context. Internal reliability, content validity, and predictive validity were good, although the predictive validity of the three character strengths for psychological symptoms in the medical sample was more modest than that in the community sample.

Conclusions

TICS is expected to be used for screening populations at risk, and a tool to aid mental health professionals in group-based treatment/intervention planning. It also should be noted that this short inventory should be used with caution for individual decision making.

Keywords

Strength assessment Psychometrics Cross-culture Positive psychiatry Positive psychology Wellbeing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank their participants for their generous contributions to this research. We thank Pengfei Guo in Hospital (T. M. C.) Afflicted Southwest Medical University, Pei Gan in The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, and Deqiang Ning in School of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology for their help in data collection. We also appreciate Professor Robert McGrath in Fairleigh Dicinson University for his comments on the early manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Wuhan University Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Development Program for Young Scholars “Sociology of Happiness and Positive Education” (Grant No: Whu2016019).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author, Wenjie Duan, declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Character strengths research and practice. Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boardman, S., & Doraiswamy, P. M. (2015). Integrating positive psychiatry into clinical practice. In D. V. Jeste & B. W. Palmer (Eds.), Positive psychiatry: A clinical handbook. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (the first 10 years). In H. H. Knoop & A. D. Fave (Eds.), Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (pp. 11–29). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rashid, T., & Ostermann, R. F. (2009). Strength-based assessment in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 488–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bird, V. J., Le Boutillier, C., Leamy, M., Larsen, J., G Oades, L., Williams, J., et al. (2012). Assessing the strengths of mental health consumers: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 1024–1033. doi: 10.1037/a0028983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho, S. M. Y., Rochelle, T. L. R., Law, L. S. C., Duan, W., Bai, Y., Shih, S.-M., et al. (2014). Methodological issues in positive psychology research with diverse populations: Exploring strengths among Chinese adults. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism & positive psychology (pp. 45–57). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.994222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joseph, S., & Wood, A. (2010). Assessment of positive functioning in clinical psychology: Theoretical and practical issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 830–838.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203–213. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative” description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Seligman, M. E. P., Peterson, C., Park, N., & Harzer, C. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, K., & Choubisa, R. (2010). Empirical validation of values in action-inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian context. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2004). Classification and measurement of character strengths: Implications for practice. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 433–446). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azañedo, C. M., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2014). Character strengths in Spain: Validation of the values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish sample. Clínica y Salud, 25(2), 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.clysa.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khumalo, I. P., Wissing, M. P., & Temane, Q. M. (2008). Exploring the validity of the values-in-action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in an African context. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(1), 133–142.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shryack, J., Steger, M. F., Krueger, R. F., & Kallie, C. S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 714–719. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Does it matter where we live?: The urban psychology of character strengths. American Psychologist, 65(6), 535–547. doi: 10.1037/a0019621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kristjánsson, K. (2010). Positive psychology, happiness, and virtue: The troublesome conceptual issues. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 296–310. doi: 10.1037/a0020781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ho, S. M. Y., Duan, W., & Tang, S. C. M. (2014). The psychology of virtue and happiness in western and asian thought. In N. E. Snow & F. V. Trivigno (Eds.), The philosophy and psychology of character and happiness (pp. 215–238). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603. doi: 10.1037/a0022389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leong, F. T., Leung, K., & Cheung, F. M. (2010). Integrating cross-cultural psychology research methods into ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 590–597. doi: 10.1037/a0020127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Bai, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., et al. (2012). Factor structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), 680–688. doi: 10.1177/1049731512450074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Bai, Y., & Tang, X. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(3), 336–345. doi: 10.1177/1049731513477214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sims, A., Barker, C., Price, C., & Fornells-Ambrojo, M. (2015). Psychological impact of identifying character strengths in people with psychosis. Psychosis, 7(2), 179–182. doi: 10.1080/17522439.2014.925485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short Scales—Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2013). Self-and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 116–127. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.758305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Duan, W., Bai, Y., Tang, X., Siu, P. Y., Chan, R. K. H., & Ho, S. M. Y. (2012). Virtues and positive mental health. Hong Kong Journal of Mental Health, 38(5), 24–31.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M., et al. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.536773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Güsewell, A., & Ruch, W. (2012). Are only emotional strengths emotional? Character strengths and disposition to positive emotions. Applied Psychology, 4(2), 218–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01070.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 153–169. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Duan, W. (2016). The benefits of personal strengths in mental health of stressed students: A longitudinal investigation. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2879–2888. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1320-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Siu, B. P. Y., Li, T., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Role of virtues and perceived life stress in affecting psychological symptoms among Chinese college students. Journal of American College Health, 63(1), 32–39. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.963109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(6), 419–430. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.516765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Tang, X., Li, T., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Character strength-based intervention to promote satisfaction with life in the Chinese university context. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1347–1361. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9479-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Duan, W., Guo, P., & Gan, P. (2015). Relationships among trait resilience, virtues, post-traumatic stress disorder, and post-traumatic growth. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0125707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125707.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1080/17439760500372739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2009). How virtuous are gelotophobes? Self-and peer-reported character strengths among those who fear being laughed at. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1–2), 145–163. doi: 10.1515/HUMR.2009.007.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mongrain, M., Anselmo-Matthews, T., et al. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. (2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 382–389. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21839.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McGrath, R. E. (2015). Measurement invariance in translations of the VIA inventory of strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000248.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., Parada, R. H., Richards, G., & Heubeck, B. G. (2005). A short version of the self description questionnaire II: operationalizing criteria for short-form evaluation with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 81–102. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (Seventh Edition ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety and stress scales (2 edn.). Sydney: Psychological Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang, K., Shi, H.-S., Geng, F.-L., Zou, L.-Q., Tan, S.-P., Wang, Y., et al. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the depression anxiety stress scale–21 in China. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), e88–e100. doi: 10.1037/pas0000207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structureal equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, application, and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ho, S. M. Y., Li, W. L., Duan, W., Siu, B. P. Y., Yau, S., Yeung, G., et al. (2016). A brief strengths scale for individuals with mental health issues. Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 147–157. doi: 10.1037/pas0000164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Duan, W., & Ho, S. M. Y. (2016). Three-dimensional model of strengths: Examination of invariance across gender, age, education levels, and marriage status. Community Mental Health Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0038-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bellier-Teichmann, T., & Pomini, V. (2015). Evolving from clinical to positive psychology: understanding and measuring patients’ strengths: A pilot study. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 45(2), 99–108. doi: 10.1007/s10879-014-9287-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cloninger, C. R. (2013). What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges? Mens Sana Monographs, 11(1), 16–24. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.109288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ruch, W., Martínez-Martí, M. L., Proyer, R. T., & Harzer, C. (2014). The character strengths rating form (CSRF): Development and initial assessment of a 24-item rating scale to assess character strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bontempo, D. E., & Hofer, S. M. (2007). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In A. D. Ong & M. V. Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths-vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00456.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hamilton, N. A., Kitzman, H., & Guyotte, S. (2006). Enhancing health and emotion: Mindfulness as a missing link between cognitive therapy and positive psychology. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20(2), 123–134. doi: 10.1891/jcop.20.2.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Seligman, M. E. P. (2015). Chris Peterson’s unfinished masterwork: The real mental illnesses. The Journal of Positive Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.888582.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Heene, M., Bollmann, S., & Bühner, M. (2014). Much ado about nothing, or much to do about something? Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 245–249. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). Shortening the S-STAI: Consequences for research and clinical practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75(2), 167–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2012). Test length and decision quality in personnel selection: When is short too short? International Journal of Testing, 12(4), 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Emons, W. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 105–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ziegler, M., Poropat, A., & Mell, J. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 250–261. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of the comprehensive inventory of thriving (CIT) and the brief inventory of thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology, 6(3), 251–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Duan, W., Guan, Y., & Gan, F. (2016). Brief inventory of thriving: A comprehensive measurement of wellbeing. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 1(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1177/2397200916665230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rammstedt, B., & Beierlein, C. (2014). Can’t we make it any shorter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 212–220. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., & Koelkebeck, T. (2014). Psychometric comparison of automated versus rational methods of scale abbreviation. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 221–235. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cloninger, C. R. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations