Quality of Life Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 859–867 | Cite as

Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings

  • Hillary L. BroderEmail author
  • Maureen Wilson-Genderson
  • Lacey Sischo



This paper evaluated the impact of cleft-related surgery on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of youth with cleft over time.


Data were derived from a 5-year, multi-center, prospective, longitudinal study of 1196 youth with cleft lip and/or palate and their caregivers. Eligible youth were between 7.5 and 18.5 years old, spoke English or Spanish, and were non-syndromic. During each observational period, which included baseline, and 1- and 2-year post-baseline follow-up visits, youths and their caregivers completed the Child Oral Health Impact Profile, a validated measure of OHRQoL. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of receipt of craniofacial surgery on OHRQoL over time.


During the course of this study a total of 516 patients (43 %) received at least one surgery. Youth in the surgery recommendation group had lower self- (β = −2.18, p < 0.05) and proxy-rated (β = −2.92, p < 0.02) OHRQoL when compared to non-surgical self- and proxy-rated OHRQoL at baseline. Both surgical and non-surgical youth (β = 3.73, p < 0.001) and caregiver (β = 1.91, p < 0.05) ratings of OHRQoL improved over time. There was significant incremental improvement (time × surgery interaction) in self-reported OHRQoL for youth postsurgery (β = 1.04, p < 0.05), but this postsurgery increment was not seen in the caregiver proxy ratings.


Surgical intervention impacts OHRQoL among youth with cleft. Youth who were surgical candidates had lower baseline self- and caregiver-rated OHRQoL when compared to non-surgical youth. Youth who underwent cleft-related surgery had significant incremental improvements in self-rated but not caregiver (proxy)-rated OHRQoL after surgery.


Oral health-related quality of life Cleft lip/palate Longitudinal Patient-reported outcomes Caregiver (proxy) ratings 



The authors recognize and thank the National Institutes of Health/National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research for supporting this research project, Quality of Life in Children with Cleft—DE018729 (H.L. Broder, PI). We appreciate the participation of the patients and their caregivers at the research sites. Lastly, we thank our research and clinical collaborators at New York University Langone Medical Center (R. Flores, PI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (C. Crerand, D. Sarwer, PIs), Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (J. Riski, PI), University of North Carolina, (M. Stein, PI); and University of Illinois at Chicago, (J. Rosenberg, PI).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent/assent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Canfield, M. A., Ramadhani, T. A., Yuskiv, N., Davidoff, M. J., Petrini, J. R., Hobbs, C. A., et al. (2006). Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects—United States, 1999–2001 (Reprinted from MMWR, vol 54, pg 1301–1305, 2006). Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(6), 618–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patrick, D. L., Topolski, T. D., Edwards, T. C., Aspinall, C. L., Kapp-Simon, K. A., Rumsey, N. J., et al. (2007). Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 44(5), 538–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broder, H. L. (2007). Children’s oral health-related quality of life. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(Suppl 1), 5–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wehby, G. L., Ohsfeldt, R. L., & Murray, J. C. (2006). Health professionals’ assessment of health-related quality of life values for oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale method. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 43(4), 383–391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Locker, D., & Allen, F. (2007). What do measures of ‘oral health-related quality of life’ measure? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(6), 401–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Queiroz Herkrath, A. P. C. D., Herkrath, F. J., Rebelo, M. A. B., & Vettore, M. V. (2015). Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 52(2), 157–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker, S. R., Owens, J., Stern, M., & Willmot, D. (2009). Coping strategies and social support in the family impact of cleft lip and palate and parents’ adjustment and psychological distress. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 46(3), 229–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broder, H. L. (2001). Using psychological assessment and therapeutic strategies to enhance well-being. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 38(3), 248–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feragen, K. B., Borge, A. I., & Rumsey, N. (2009). Social experience in 10-year-old children born with a cleft: Exploring psychosocial resilience. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 46(1), 65–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hunt, O., Burden, D., Hepper, P., & Johnston, C. (2005). The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics, 27(3), 274–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Topolski, T. D., Edwards, T. C., & Patrick, D. L. (2005). Quality of life: How do adolescents with facial differences compare with other adolescents? Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 42(1), 25–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broder, H., & Strauss, R. P. (1989). Self-concept of early primary-school age children with visible or invisible defects. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 26(2), 114–118.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wehby, G. L., Collet, B., Barron, S., Romitti, P. A., Ansley, T. N., & Speltz, M. (2014). Academic achievement of children and adolescents with oral clefts. Pediatrics, 133(5), 785–792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crerand, C. E., Sarwer, D. B., Kazak, A. E., Clark, A., & Rumsey, N. (2015). Body image and psychosocial functioning in adolescents with craniofacial conditions. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (in press).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinquart, M., & Shen, Y. (2011). Depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(4), 375–384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al Agili, D. E., Roseman, J., Pass, M. A., Thornton, J. B., & Chavers, L. S. (2004). Access to dental care in Alabama for children with special needs: Parents’ perspectives. Journal of the American Dental Association, 135, 490–495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broder, H. L., Wilson-Genderson, M., Sischo, L., & Norman, R. G. (2014). Examining factors associated with oral health-related quality of life for youth with cleft. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 133(6), 828e–834e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Broder, H. L., Wilson-Genderson, M., & Sischo, L. (2012). Health disparities among children with cleft. American Journal of Public Health. 102(5): 828–830.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Danielsson, A. J., Wiklund, I., Pehrsson, K., & Nachemson, A. L. (2001). Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European Spine Journal, 10(4), 278–288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Howard, A., Donaldson, S., Hedden, D., Stephens, D., Alman, B., & Wright, J. (2007). Improvement in quality of life following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 32(24), 2715–2718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karlsson, J., Taft, C., Rydén, A., Sjöström, L., & Sullivan, M. (2007). Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: The SOS intervention study. International Journal of Obesity, 31(8), 1248–1261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Latal, B., Helfricht, S., Fischer, J. E., Bauersfeld, U., & Landolt, M. A. (2009). Psychological adjustment and quality of life in children and adolescents following open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics, 9(1), 6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Willan, A., & Griffith, L. E. (1994). Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47(1), 81–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sischo, L., & Broder, H. L. (2011). Oral health-related quality of life: What, why, how, and future implications. Journal of Dental Research, 90(11), 1264–1270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Genderson, M. W., Sischo, L., Markowitz, K., Fine, D., & Broder, H. L. (2013). An overview of children’s oral health-related quality of life assessment: From scale development to measuring outcomes. Caries Research, 47(Suppl 1), 13–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Broder, H. L., Wilson-Genderson, M., & Sischo, L. (2014). Examination of a theoretical model for oral health-related quality of life among youths with cleft. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), 865–871.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ruff, R. R., Sischo, L., & Broder, H. L. (2016). Resiliency and socioemotional functioning in youth receiving surgery for orofacial anomalies. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 44(4):371–380. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12222 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Long, R. E., Jr., Wilson-Genderson, M., Grayson, B. H., Flores, R. L., & Broder, H. L. (2015). Oral health related quality of life and self-rated speech in children with existing fistulas in mid-childhood and adolescence. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. doi: 10.1597/15-123.
  31. 31.
    American Cleft Palate Association (1993). Parameters for the evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies (Revised Edition–November 2009). Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 30 (Suppl 1).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Broder, H. L., & Wilson-Genderson, M. (2007). Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child’s version). Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(Suppl 1), 20–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    SAS Institute. (2014). Base SAS 9.4 procedures guide: Statistical procedures. Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dunlow, N., Phillips, C., & Broder, H. L. (2007). Concurrent validity of the COHIP. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(Suppl 1), 41–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ruff, R. R., Broder, H. L., & Sischo, L. (2016). Minimally important difference of the child oral health impact profile for children with orofacial anomalies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (in press).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sischo, L., Clouston, S., Phillips, C., & Broder, H. L. (2015). Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: A mixed method approach. Health Psychology. 35(5): 474–482.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Broder, H. L., Flores, R. L., Clouston, S., Kirschner, R. E., Garfinkle, J. S., & Sischo, L., et al. (2015). Surgeon’s and caregivers’ appraisal of primary cleft lip treatment with and without nasoalveolar molding: A prospective multicenter pilot study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 137(3): 938–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brumberg, J. J. (2010). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lawler, M., & Nixon, E. (2011). Body dissatisfaction among adolescent boys and girls: The effects of body mass, peer appearance culture and internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(1), 59–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lewinsohn, P. M., Roberts, R. E., Seeley, J. R., Rohde, P., Gotlib, I. H., & Hops, H. (1994). Adolescent psychopathology: II. Psychosocial risk factors for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(2), 302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2004). Thin-ideal internalization and social comparison tendency as moderators of media models’ impact on women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 768–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stice, E., & Bearman, S. K. (2001). Body-image and eating disturbances prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms in adolescent girls: A growth curve analysis. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Feragen, K. B., Kvalem, I. L., Rumsey, N., & Borge, A. I. H. (2010). Adolescents with and without a facial difference: The role of friendships and social acceptance in perceptions of appearance and emotional resilience. Body Image, 7(4), 271–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strauss, R. P. (2001). “Only skin deep”: Health, resilience, and craniofacial care. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 38(3), 226–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seid, M. (2008). Barriers to care and primary care for vulnerable children with asthma. Pediatrics, 122(5), 994–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    McPherson, M., Weissman, G., Strickland, B. B., van Dyck, P. C., Blumberg, S. J., & Newacheck, P. W. (2004). Implementing community-based systems of services for children and youths with special health care needs: How well are we doing? Pediatrics, 113(5 Suppl), 1538–1544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Oral health in America: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Feragen, K. B., Stock, N. M., & Kvalem, I. L. (2015). Risk and protective factors at age 16: Psychological adjustment in children with a cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 52(5), 555–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kirschner, R. E. (2015). President of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. (Personal communication with Dr. Broder, June, 2015).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Masood, M., Masood, Y., Saub, R., & Newton, J. T. (2012). Need of minimal important difference for oral health-related quality of life measures. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 74(1), 13–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wyrwich, K. W., Nienaber, N. A., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 37(5), 469–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Strickland, B. B., Singh, G. K., Kogan, M. D., Mann, M. Y., van Dyck, P. C., & Newacheck, P. W. (2009). Access to the medical home: New findings from the 2005–2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Pediatrics, 123(6), e996–e1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wehby, G. L., & Cassell, C. H. (2010). The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs. Oral Diseases, 16(1), 3–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Seid, M., Opipari-Arrigan, L., Gelhard, L. R., Varni, J. W., & Driscoll, K. (2009). Barriers to care questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change among parents of children with asthma. Academic Pediatric, 9(2), 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hillary L. Broder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maureen Wilson-Genderson
    • 2
  • Lacey Sischo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cariology and Comprehensive CareNew York University College of DentistryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations