Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 2571–2577 | Cite as

The Swedish SCOPA-SLEEP for assessment of sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls

  • Peter Hagell
  • Albert Westergren
  • Shorena Janelidze
  • Oskar Hansson
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

SCOPA-SLEEP is a rating scale for night-time sleep and daytime sleepiness (DS) proposed for use among people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) as well as others. We translated it into Swedish and assessed its psychometric properties in PD and age-matched healthy controls.

Methods

Following translation according to the dual-panel approach, the Swedish SCOPA-SLEEP was field-tested regarding comprehensibility, relevance and respondent burden (n = 20). It was then psychometrically tested according to classical test theory (data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability and construct validity) using data from 149 people with PD and 53 age-matched healthy controls from the prospective Swedish BioFINDER study.

Results

SCOPA-SLEEP took a mean of 3.5 min to complete and was considered easy to use and relevant. Missing item responses were <8 %, corrected item–total correlations were ≥0.47 (except for one DS item among controls), factor analyses suggested one dimension per scale, floor/ceiling effects were ≤17 %, reliability was ≥0.85 except for the DS scale among controls (0.65) and construct validity was supported.

Conclusions

Observations concur with previous evaluations, thus providing initial support for the Swedish SCOPA-SLEEP among people with PD. Further studies are needed to establish its generic properties and to understand its measurement properties in better detail.

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease Rating scale Reliability Sleep Translation Validity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants, translators and lay people for their cooperation, and S. Hall, Y. Surova, K. Johansson, J. Reimer and A. Höglund for data collection. The study was supported by the European Research Council, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Parkinson Foundation, the Swedish Parkinson Academy, the Basal Ganglia Disorders Linnaeus Consortium (BAGADILICO) at Lund University, the Swedish federal government under the ALF agreement, and Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Schrempf, W., Brandt, M. D., Storch, A., & Reichmann, H. (2014). Sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease, 4(2), 211–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Videnovic, A., & Golombek, D. (2013). Circadian and sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology, 243, 45–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hogl, B., Arnulf, I., Comella, C., Ferreira, J., Iranzo, A., Tilley, B., et al. (2010). Scales to assess sleep impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 25(16), 2704–2716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marinus, J., Visser, M., van Hilten, J. J., Lammers, G. J., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2003). Assessment of sleep and sleepiness in Parkinson disease. Sleep, 26(8), 1049–1054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martinez-Martin, P., Visser, M., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., Marinus, J., Chaudhuri, K. R., van Hilten, J. J., et al. (2008). SCOPA-sleep and PDSS: Two scales for assessment of sleep disorder in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 23(12), 1681–1688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Setthawatcharawanich, S., Limapichat, K., Sathirapanya, P., & Phabphal, K. (2011). Validation of the Thai SCOPA-sleep scale for assessment of sleep and sleepiness in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 94(2), 179–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swaine-Verdier, A., Doward, L. C., Hagell, P., Thorsen, H., & McKenna, S. P. (2004). Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health, 7(Suppl 1), S27–S30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gelb, D. J., Oliver, E., & Gilman, S. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Archives of Neurology, 56(1), 33–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fahn, S., Elton, R. L., & Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. (1987). Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, D. B. Calne, & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Recent developments in Parkinson’s Disease (Vol. 2, pp. 153–163). Florham Park: MacMillan Healthcare Information.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17(5), 427–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess, 13(12), iii, ix-x, 1–177.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ware, J. E, Jr, & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 945–952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saris-Baglama, R. N., Dewey, C. J., Chisholm, G. B., Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Ware, J. E, Jr. (2004). SF health outcomes™ scoring software user’s guide. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Hagell
    • 1
  • Albert Westergren
    • 1
  • Shorena Janelidze
    • 2
  • Oskar Hansson
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.The PRO-CARE Group, School of Health and SocietyKristianstad UniversityKristianstadSweden
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Sciences, MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Memory ClinicSkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations