Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 2523–2533 | Cite as

Comparability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric short form symptom measures across culture: examination between Chinese and American children with cancer

  • Yanyan Liu
  • Changrong Yuan
  • Jichuan Wang
  • Jeanne Geiger Brown
  • Fen Zhou
  • Xiufang Zhao
  • Min Shen
  • Pamela S. Hinds
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric forms measure symptoms and function of pediatric patients experiencing chronic disease by using the same measures. Comparability is one of the most important purposes of the PROMIS initiative. This study aimed to test the factorial structures of four symptom measures (i.e., Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Pain Interference) in the original English and the Chinese versions and examine the measurement invariance of the measures across two cultures.

Methods

Four PROMIS Pediatric measures were used to assess symptoms, respectively, in Chinese (n = 232) and American (n = 200) children and adolescents (8–17 years old) in treatment for cancer or in survivorship. The categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA) model was used to examine factorial structures, and multigroup CCFA was applied to test measurement invariance of these measures between the Chinese and American samples.

Results

The CCFA models of the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures fit the data well for both the Chinese and American children and adolescents. Minor partial measurement invariance was identified. Factor means and factor variances of the four PROMIS measures were not significantly different between the two populations.

Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures have valid factorial structures and a statistical property of measurement invariance across American and Chinese children and adolescents with cancer. This means that the items of these measures were interpreted in a conceptually similar manner by two groups. They could be readily used for meaningful cross-cultural comparisons involving pediatric oncology patients in these two countries.

Keywords

PROMIS Pediatric Measurement invariance Categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA) Cancer Culture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Chinese study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71473262) and the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Foundation and China Scholarship Council (No. 201406580007). The America study (PROMIS®) was funded with cooperative agreements from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund Initiative (Northwestern University, PI: David Cella, PhD, U54AR057951, U01AR052177; Northwestern University, PI: Richard C. Gershon, PhD, U54AR057943; American Institutes for Research, PI: Susan (San) D. Keller, PhD, U54AR057926; State University of New York, Stony Brook, PIs: Joan E. Broderick, PhD and Arthur A. Stone, PhD, U01AR057948, U01AR052170; University of Washington, Seattle, PIs: Heidi M. Crane, MD, MPH, Paul K. Crane, MD, MPH, and Donald L. Patrick, PhD, U01AR057954; University of Washington, Seattle, PI: Dagmar Amtmann, PhD, U01AR052171; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, PI: Harry A. Guess, MD, PhD (deceased), Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH, U01AR052181; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, PI: Christopher B. Forrest, MD, PhD, U01AR057956; Stanford University, PI: James F. Fries, MD, U01AR052158; Boston University, PIs: Alan Jette, PT, PhD, Stephen M. Haley, PhD (deceased), and David Scott Tulsky, PhD (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), U01AR057929; University of California, Los Angeles, PIs: Dinesh Khanna, MD (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS, U01AR057936; University of Pittsburgh, PI: Paul A. Pilkonis, PhD, U01AR052155; Georgetown University, PIs: Carol. M. Moinpour, PhD (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle) and Arnold L. Potosky, PhD, U01AR057971; Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, PI: Esi M. Morgan DeWitt, MD, MSCE, U01AR057940; University of Maryland, Baltimore, PI: Lisa M. Shulman, MD, U01AR057967; and Duke University, PI: Kevin P. Weinfurt, PhD, U01AR052186). NIH Science Officers on this project have included Deborah Ader, PhD, Vanessa Ameen, MD (deceased), Susan Czajkowski, PhD, Basil Eldadah, MD, PhD, Lawrence Fine, MD, DrPH, Lawrence Fox, MD, PhD, Lynne Haverkos, MD, MPH, Thomas Hilton, PhD, Laura Lee Johnson, PhD, Michael Kozak, PhD, Peter Lyster, PhD, Donald Mattison, MD, Claudia Moy, PhD, Louis Quatrano, PhD, Bryce Reeve, PhD, William Riley, PhD, Peter Scheidt, MD, Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH, Susana Serrate-Sztein, MD, William Phillip Tonkins, DrPH, Ellen Werner, PhD, Tisha Wiley, PhD, and James Witter, MD, PhD. The contents of this article use data developed under PROMIS. These contents do not necessarily represent an endorsement by the US Federal Government or PROMIS. See www.nihpromis.org for additional information on the PROMIS® initiative.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All the studies conducted in China and USA have got the ethical approval from the hospitals and institutions. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee.

Informal consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Trotti, A., Colevas, A. D., Setser, A., & Basch, E. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(32), 5121–5127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., Reeve, B. B., Smith, M. L., Coons, S., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249–4255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcomes measures. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2014.
  4. 4.
    Baggott, C., Dodd, M., Kennedy, C., Marina, N., & Miaskowski, C. (2009). Multiple symptoms in pediatric oncology patients: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 26(6), 325–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varni, J. W., Limbers, C., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Literature review: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: Hearing the voices of the children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(9), 1151–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hockenberry, M. J., Hinds, P. S., Barrera, P., Bryant, R., Adams-McNeill, J., Hooke, C., et al. (2003). Three instruments to assess fatigue in children with cancer: The child, parent and staff perspectives. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(4), 319–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linder, L. A. (2005). Measuring physical symptoms in children and adolescents with cancer. Cancer Nursing, 28(1), 16–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinds, P. S., Hockenberry, M., Tong, X., Rai, S. N., Gattuso, J. S., McCarthy, K., et al. (2007). Validity and reliability of a new instrument to measure cancer-related fatigue in adolescents. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 607–618.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Katz, E. R., Meeske, K., & Dickinson, P. (2002). The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module. Cancer, 94(7), 2090–2106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12–S21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walsh, T. R., Irwin, D. E., Meier, A., Varni, J. W., & DeWalt, D. A. (2008). The use of focus groups in the development of the PROMIS pediatrics item bank. Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 725–735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., et al. (2010). Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 585–594.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: An item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank. Journal of Pain, 11(11), 1109–1119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2012). PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: An item response theory analysis. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 697–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hinds, P. S., Nuss, S. L., Ruccione, K. S., Withycombe, J. S., Jacobs, S., DeLuca, H., et al. (2013). PROMIS pediatric measures in pediatric oncology: Valid and clinically feasible indicators of patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 60(3), 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menard, J. C., Hinds, P. S., Jacobs, S. S., Cranston, K., Wang, J., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2014). Feasibility and acceptability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), 66–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sousa, K. H., West, S. G., Moser, S. E., Harris, J. A., & Cook, S. W. (2012). Establishing measurement invariance: English and Spanish Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Nursing Research, 61(3), 171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Loey, N. E., Van de Schoot, R., Gerdin, B., Faber, A. W., Sjöberg, F., & Willebrand, M. (2013). The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief: Measurement invariant across European countries. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 74(5), 1321–1326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu, Y., Hinds, P. S., Wang, J., Correia, H., Du, S., Ding, J., et al. (2013). Translation and linguistic validation of the pediatric patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures into simplified Chinese using cognitive interviewing methodology. Cancer Nursing, 36(5), 368–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu, Y., Shen, Y., Yu, X., Qiu, Y., & Yuan, C. (2013). Analysis of known-group validity of Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Nursing Journal Of Chinese PLA, 30(6), 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu, Y. (2013). Measurement examination of Chinese version of pediatric PROMIS measures among children and adolescents with cancer. Master dissertation, Second Military Medical University. http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis_Y2339995.aspx. Assessed October 15, 2014.
  30. 30.
    Millsap, R. E., & Tein, J.-Y. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multi-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Note # 4, Los Angeles, CA. (http://www.statmodel.com/mplus/examples/webnotes/).
  32. 32.
    Glöckner-Rist, A., & Hoijtink, H. (2003). The best of both worlds: Factor analysis of dichotomous data using item response theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 544–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hofmans, J., Pepermans, R., & Loix, E. (2009). Measurement invariance matters: A case made for the ORTOFIN. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished Manuscript (http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf).
  35. 35.
    Muthén & Muthén. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muthén, B. (2010). IRT in Mplus. Mplus Web note. https://www.statmodel.com/irtanalysisshtml. Accessed May 25, 2014.
  38. 38.
    Liu, Y., Wang, J., Hinds, P. S., Wang, J., Shen, N., Zhao, X., et al. (2014). The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: An item response analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression short forms. Quality of Life Research, 24(6), 1491–1501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wong, M. Y. F., & Chan, S. W. C. (2006). The qualitative experience of Chinese parents with children diagnosed of cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(6), 710–717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen, L. M., Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M., & Pantilat, S. (2008). Concepts within the Chinese culture that influence the cancer pain experience. Cancer Nursing, 31(2), 103–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lekes, N., Gingras, I., Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Fang, J. (2010). Parental autonomy-support, intrinsic life goals, and wellbeing among adolescents in China and North America. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 858–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanyan Liu
    • 1
  • Changrong Yuan
    • 1
  • Jichuan Wang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jeanne Geiger Brown
    • 4
  • Fen Zhou
    • 5
  • Xiufang Zhao
    • 6
  • Min Shen
    • 7
  • Pamela S. Hinds
    • 3
    • 8
  1. 1.School of NursingSecond Military Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Division of Biostatistics and Study Methodology, Center for Translational ScienceChildren’s National Health SystemWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.School of MedicineThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family and Community HealthUniversity of Maryland School of NursingBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Department of Hematology and OncologyShanghai Children’s Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  6. 6.Nursing DepartmentWest China Second University Hospital Affiliated to Sichuan UniversitySichuanChina
  7. 7.Nursing DepartmentChildren’s Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhouChina
  8. 8.Department of Nursing Research and Quality Outcomes, Center for Translational ScienceChildren’s National Health SystemWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations