Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 2109–2116 | Cite as

Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects

  • Clifton O. BinghamIII
  • Susan J. Bartlett
  • Peter A. Merkel
  • Thelma J. Mielenz
  • Paul A. Pilkonis
  • Lauren Edmundson
  • Emily Moore
  • Rajeev K. Sabharwal
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The field of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) continues to develop. Patient-reported outcomes and, in particular the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) contribute complementary data to clinician-derived outcomes traditionally used in health decision-making. However, there has been little work to understand how PROMIS measures may inform or be integrated into PCOR or clinical applications.

Methods

Lead investigators from four pilot projects funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) collaborated to discuss lessons learned about the use of PROMIS in PCOR studies via virtual and in-person meetings. In addition, a qualitative data collection tool was used to assess the pilot projects’ experiences.

Results

Lessons learned from the pilot projects centered on practical elements of research design, such as choosing the right outcomes to study, considering the advantages and limitations of the PROMIS short forms and computer adaptive technology versions, planning ahead for a feasible data collection process, maintaining the focus on patients by ensuring that the research is truly patient-centered, and helping patients and providers make the most of PROMIS in care.

Conclusion

The PCORI pilot projects demonstrated that PROMIS can be successfully used to conduct research that will help patients make decisions about their care. Interest in PCOR continues to grow and the lessons learned from these projects about the use of PROMIS will be helpful to investigators. Given the numerous benefits of PROMIS, implementing this tool in research and care will hopefully lead to significant progress in measuring health outcomes that are meaningful and relevant to all stakeholders.

Keywords

PROMIS Patient-centered outcomes Assessment center Rheumatoid arthritis Vasculitis Chronic disease Substance use 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported through Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Awards: Contract Numbers IP2-PI000737 (Bingham PI), IP2-PI000603 (Merkel PI), IP2-PI000797 (Mielenz PI), IP2-PI000189 (Pilkonis PI), and 2000-20-10-10 CMO 0001 (AcademyHealth). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. Dr. Bingham's work was also supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30-AR053503). Dr. Merkel’s work on this project was also supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01-AR064153). At the time of conceptualization and initial writing of the paper, Ms. Edmundson and Ms. Moore were employees of AcademyHealth.

References

  1. 1.
    Food and Drug Administration. (2009) Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2014.
  2. 2.
    Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zbrozek, A., Hebert, J., Gogates, G., Thorell, R., Dell, C., Molsen, E., et al. (2013). Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: Report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force. Value Health, 16(4), 480–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bingham III, C. O., Auger, C., Feldman, D., Noonan, V., Wolfe, D., Ahmed, S., & Bartlett, S. J. (2016). From research to care: Clinical applications of patient reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (in press).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute: PCORI’s definition of “Patient-Centered Outcomes Research”. http://www.pcori.org/content/patient-centered-outcomes-research. Accessed September 14, 2015.
  6. 6.
    Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute: “About PCORI”. http://www.pcori.org/about-us. Accessed September 14, 2015.
  7. 7.
    Selby, J. V., Beal, A. C., & Frank, L. (2012). The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA, 307(15), 1583–1584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3), S73–S79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu, A. W., Snyder, C., Clancy, C. M., & Steinwachs, D. M. (2010). Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29(10), 1863–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: PROMIS instrument overview. http://www.nihpromis.org/measures/instrumentoverview. Accessed September 14, 2015.
  11. 11.
    Alonso, J., Bartlett, S. J., Rose, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chaplin, J. E., Efficace, F., et al. (2013). The case for an international Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) initiative. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(11), 210. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wagner, L. I., Schink, J., Bass, M., Patel, S., Diaz, M. V., Rothrock, N., et al. (2015). Bringing PROMIS to practice: Brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer, 121(6), 927–934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brundage, M. D., Smith, K. C., Little, E. A., Bantug, E. T., & Snyder, C. F. (2015). Board PRODPSA: Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: Results from a mixed-methods evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2457–2472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E, Jr. (2014). The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 516–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forsythe, L. P., Ellis, L. E., Edmundson, L., Sabharwal, R., Rein, A., Konopka, K., & Frank, L. (2016). Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(1), 13–21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartlett, S. J., Hewlett, S., Bingham, C. O, 3rd, Woodworth, T. G., Alten, R., Pohl, C., et al. (2012). Identifying core domains to assess flare in rheumatoid arthritis: An OMERACT international patient and provider combined Delphi consensus. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 71(11), 1855–1860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnston, K. L., Lawrence, S. M., Dodds, N. E., Yu, L., Daley, D. C., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2016). Evaluating PROMIS instruments and methods for patient-centered outcomes research: Patient and provider voices in a substance use treatment setting. Quality of Life Research, 25(3), 615–624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robson, J. C., Milman, N., Tomasson, G., Dawson, J., Cronholm, P. F., Kellom, K., et al. (2015). Exploration, development, and validation of patient-reported outcomes in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis using the OMERACT process. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(11), 2204–2209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartlett, S. J., Orbai, A. M., Duncan, T., DeLeon, E., Ruffing, V., Clegg-Smith, K., & Bingham, C. O, 3rd. (2015). Reliability and validity of selected PROMIS measures in people with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0138543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of RheumatologyJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Trials UnitMcGill University/Royal Victoria HospitalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Division of Rheumatology and Department of Biostatistics and Clinical EpidemiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of EpidemiologyColumbia University Mailman School of Public HealthNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  6. 6.Swedish Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  7. 7.University of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn ArborUSA
  8. 8.AcademyHealthWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations