Use of weekly assessment data to enhance evaluation of a subjective wellbeing intervention
- 300 Downloads
While intervention effects in target outcomes have typically been tested based on change from baseline to post-intervention, such approaches typically ignore individual differences in change, including time taken to see improvement. The present study demonstrates how weekly patient-reported data may be used to augment traditional pre–post intervention evaluations in order to gain greater insights into treatment efficacy.
Two hundred and fifty-two adolescent boys and girls (M age = 13.6 years, SD = 0.6 years) from four secondary schools in Victoria, Australia, were assigned by school into control (n = 88) or intervention (n = 164) groups. The intervention group participated in a 6-week course designed to improve subjective wellbeing (SWB) by fostering resilience, coping skills, and self-esteem. In addition to baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments of SWB, intervention group participants also completed weekly summarise of affective experiences for the duration of the intervention phase.
While standard pre–post data showed significant improvement in SWB for the intervention group relative to controls, weekly data showed individual differences in the trajectory of change during this intervention phase; low SWB individuals experienced initial worsening of symptoms followed by improvement in the second half of the intervention phase, whereas high SWB individuals experienced initial gains, followed by a plateau from Week 4 onwards.
Addition of weekly data provided greater insights into intervention effects by: (1) contradicting the notion that early responsiveness to treatment is predictive of level of improvement by post-intervention, and (2) providing data-based insights into ways to enhance the intervention.
KeywordsSubjective wellbeing School intervention Trajectories of change Patient-reported outcomes
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national ethical research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- 1.Merry, S., McDowell, H., Hetrick, S., Bir, J., & Muller, N. (2004). Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2. Google Scholar
- 9.Voogt, C., Kuntsche, E., Kleinjan, M., Poelen, E., & Engels, R. (2014). Using ecological momentary assessment to test the effectiveness of a web-based brief alcohol intervention over time among heavy-drinking students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A. W., & Esperanza, J. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behaviour support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(3), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal wellbeing index-school children (PWI-SC) (3rd ed.). Retrieved from Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne. http://www.acqol.com.au/iwbg/wellbeing-index/index.php
- 21.Blore, J. (2008). Subjective wellbeing: An assessment of competing theories. (Doctoral dissertation, Deakin University). Retrieved from http://www.acqol.com.au/publications/index.php
- 27.Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Census of population and housing: Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011?OpenDocument
- 29.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 32.Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 33.Mendlewicz, J. (2010). Time in depression. Medicographia, 32(2), 109–111.Google Scholar
- 34.Horowitz, J. L., Garber, J., Ciesla, J. A., Young, J. F., & Mufson, L. (2007). Prevention of depressive symptoms in adolescents: A randomized trial of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal prevention programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 693–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar