Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 699–705 | Cite as

Well-being and environmental quality: Does pollution affect life satisfaction?

  • Kati Orru
  • Hans Orru
  • Marek Maasikmets
  • Reigo Hendrikson
  • Mare Ainsaar
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to explore the effect of ambient air pollution on individual persons’ levels of subjective well-being. Our research question was: to what extent is an individual’s life satisfaction shaped by exposure to PM10?

Methods

We used regression models to analyse data on subjective well-being indicators from the last two waves of the European social survey (ESS) and detailed information on local levels of the air pollutant PM10.

Results

An increase in PM10 annual concentrations by 1 μg/m3 was associated with a significant reduction in life satisfaction of .017 points on the ESS 10-point life satisfaction scale.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that even in cases of relatively low levels of PM10 air pollution (mean annual concentration of 8.3 ± 3.9 μg/m3), in addition to the effects on physical health, exposure negatively affects subjective assessments of well-being.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Environmental pollution Air quality Subjective health assessment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was carried out with the financial support from the Internationalisation of Science Programme grant by Estonian Ministry of Science and Education (Grant No. SSHUH11196T). The authors, Kati Orru, Hans Orru, Marek Maasikmets, Reigo Hendrikson and Mare Ainsaar declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures for gathering data from human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards set in the Declaration on Ethics of the International Statistical Institute (ISI, www.isi-web.org/component/content/article/43-about/about/150-ethicsintro). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Dratva, J., Zemp, E., Dietrich, E. F., Bridevaux, P.-O., Rochat, T., & Schindler, C. (2010). Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: Results from a population-based study. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 37–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, X. Y., Ohinmaa, A., & Veugelers, P. J. (2010). Sociodemographic and neighborhood determinants of health-related quality of life among grade-five students in Canada. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 969–976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orru K., & Rothstein, H. (2014). Not quite ‘dead letters’, just ‘blind eyes’: The Europeanisation of drinking water risk regulation in Estonia and Lithuania. Environment and Planning A.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO. (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution: REVIHAAP Project Technical Report. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/193108/REVIHAAP-Final-technical-report-final-version.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 11 November 2014.
  5. 5.
    Orru, H., Maasikmets, M., Lai, T., Tamm, T., Kaasik, M., Kimmel, V., et al. (2011). Health impacts of particulate matter in five major Estonian towns: Main sources of exposure and local differences. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 4(3–4), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lim, C., & Putnam, R. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eichhorn, J. (2012). Happiness for believers contextualizing the effects of religiosity on life-satisfaction. European Sociological Review,. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr027.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world, the paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luechinger, S., & Raschky, P. (2009). Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach. Journal of Public Economics,. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.10.003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Using happiness data for environmental valuation: Issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(2), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva, J., de Keulenaer, F., & Johnstone N. (2012). Environmental quality and life satisfaction: Evidence based on micro-data. OECD Environment Working Papers. doi: 10.1787/19970900.
  14. 14.
    Sørensen, M., Lühdorf, P., Ketzel, M., Andersen, Z. J., Overvad, K., & Raaschou-Nielsen, O. (2014). Combined effects of road traffic noise and ambient air pollution in relation to risk for stroke? Environmental Research, 133, 49–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Babisch, W., Wolf, K., Petz, M., Heinrich, J., Cyrys, J., & Peters, A. (2014). Associations between traffic noise, particulate air pollution, hypertension, and isolated systolic hypertension in adults. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(5), 492–498.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans, G. W., & Cohen, S. (2004). Environmental stress. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of applied psychology (Vol. I, pp. 815–824). New York: Elsevier Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stenlund, T., Lidén, E., Andersson, K., Garvill, J., & Nordin, S. (2009). Annoyance and health symptoms and their influencing factors: A population-based air pollution intervention study. Public Health, 123, 339–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guxens, M., & Sunyer, J. (2012). A review of epidemiological studies on neuropsychological effects of air pollution. Swiss Medical Weekly,. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marques, S., & Lima, M. L. (2011). Living in grey areas: Industrial activity and psychological health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luechinger, S. (2010). Life satisfaction and transboundary air pollution. Economic Letters, 107(1), 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferreira, S., Akay, A., Brereton, F., Cuñado, J., Martinsson, P., Moro, M., et al. (2013). Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecological Economics,. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.027.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brereton, F., Clinch, J. P., & Ferreira, S. (2008). Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norman, M., & Johansson, C. (2006). Studies of some measures to reduce road dust emissions from paved roads in Scandinavia. Atmospheric Environment, 40(32), 6154–6164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    AirViro. (2010). Working with the dispersion module. How to simulate the dispersion of pollutants. SMHI AirviroUser’s Reference. Volume 2. http://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.12792!/Volume2_Dispersion_3.20.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2014.
  26. 26.
    Ferreira, S., & Moro, M. (2010). On the use of subjective well-being data for environmental valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levinson, A. (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics, 96(2012), 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social StudiesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  3. 3.Estonian Environmental Research CentreTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations