The case for using country-specific scoring coefficients for scoring the SF-12, with scoring implications for the SF-36
- 569 Downloads
To examine the validity of using the same scoring coefficients across countries for the SF-12.
We test the equality of scoring coefficients derived for a contraction of the SF-36, the Short Form 12 (SF-12), using a large international database drawn from nine countries, to test equality between Australia and twelve other country/language groups. First, we checked that the theoretical structure of the SF-12 as set out by Ware and colleagues, but including a correlation between physical and mental health, provided an adequate fit to the data for each country/language group in a confirmatory factor analysis. We then compared Australia to all of these country/language groups in multiple-group models to assess whether a model producing common factor score coefficients provided an adequate fit to the data. We also derived Chi-squared tests for the differences between the restricted and unrestricted models, to test the equality of the factor score coefficients across countries.
We found that the theoretical structure of the SF-12, with a correlation between physical and mental health, provides an adequate fit to the data for all country/language groups except Hungary. Further, all the unrestricted multiple-group models provide an adequate fit to the data. In contrast, none of the multiple-group models restricted to common parameters provide an adequate fit to the data. The significance tests confirm that the constraints on parameter values produce significantly different models to the unrestricted models.
We conclude that researchers should derive their own country-specific scoring coefficients for physical and mental health summary scores.
KeywordsSelf-rated health Health-related quality of Life SF-36 SF-12 International comparisons
Compliance with ethical standards
Competing interests and funding
This work was unfunded. The authors are unaware of any possible conflict of interest in the production of this publication.
This paper is based on a secondary analysis of various International and Australian survey files. As such, this analysis did not require formal ethics approval; however, all of the original data collections were conducted under ethics approval with the informed consent of the participants.
- 4.Tucker, G. R., Adams, R. J., Wilson D.H. (2013) Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 Version 2—An alternative scoring method can correct the problem. PLoS ONE. 8(4): e61191.Google Scholar
- 5.Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R. H., Taylor, A., et al. (2007). The SF-36 Version 2: Critical analyses of weights, scoring algorithms and population norms. Quality of Life Research, 16(661), 73.Google Scholar
- 15.Stats Canada. (2011). The Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey, 2003 and 2008 Public Use Microdata File User’s Manual.Google Scholar
- 16.Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. (2006). Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey: User Guide, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4228.0.55.002.Google Scholar
- 17.Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1995). National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4399.0.Google Scholar
- 18.Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (2nd ed.). Boston: The Health Institute, New England MedicalCenter.Google Scholar
- 22.Joreskog, K. G. (2000). Latent variable scores and their uses. ILScientific Software International: Lincolnwood.Google Scholar
- 24.Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- 28.Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, L., Guilleman, F., et al. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3816–3891.Google Scholar
- 31.Life Expectancy Trends-Australia. Australian Social Trends, March (2011). Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue 4102.0.Google Scholar