Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 385–391 | Cite as

A brief psychological intervention to protect subjective well-being in a community sample

  • Christopher J. ArmitageEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Governments are using measures of subjective well-being in preference to more objective measures of social progress (e.g., gross domestic product), yet interventions to address well-being are often costly. The present study tests the ability of a brief psychological intervention based on self-affirmation theory (Steele in Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press, New York, 1988) to protect subjective well-being among a community sample likely to have diminished well-being (i.e., women aged 46 years and older, Inglehart in Int J Comp Sociol 43: 391–408, 2002. doi: 10.1177/002071520204300309).

Methods

One hundred and forty women aged 46 years and older completed baseline measures of subjective well-being, interpersonal feelings and self-esteem at baseline before being randomized to a self-affirmation or control group. Subjective well-being, interpersonal feelings and self-esteem were assessed again at follow-up.

Results

Results showed that, controlling for baseline subjective well-being, the well-being of women who had self-affirmed was significantly higher at follow-up than those in the control condition. Affirming the self did not significantly influence interpersonal feelings or self-esteem, compared with the control condition.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that a low-cost brief psychological intervention based on self-affirmation theory, with potentially large public health “reach,” could be used to protect subjective well-being—a key aim of government policies.

Keywords

Brief intervention Subjective well-being Self-affirmation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Josh Williamson for his help with collecting and entering the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

I declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender aging and subjective well-being. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 391–408. doi: 10.1177/002071520204300309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. OECD.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 764–771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fledderus, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Smit, F., & Westerhof, G. J. (2010). Mental health promotion as a new goal in public mental health care: A randomized controlled trial of an intervention enhancing psychological flexibility. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2372–2378. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196196.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmeichel, B. J., & Martens, A. (2005). Self-affirmation and mortality salience: Affirming values reduces worldview defense and death-thought accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 658–667. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armitage, C. J., Harris, P. R., & Arden, M. A. (2011). Evidence that self-affirmation reduces alcohol consumption: Randomized exploratory trial with a new, brief means of self-affirming. Health Psychology, 30, 633–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McQueen, A., & Klein, W. (2006). Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5, 289–354. doi: 10.1080/15298860600805325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crocker, J., Niiya, Y., & Mischkowski, D. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19, 740–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armitage, C. J., & Rowe, R. (2011). Testing multiple means of self-affirmation. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 535–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Armitage, C. J., Rowe, R., Arden, M. A., & Harris, P. R. (2014). A brief psychological intervention that reduces adolescent alcohol consumption. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 546–550. doi: 10.1037/a0035802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self- esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 606–612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations