Item-level informant discrepancies between children and their parents on the PROMIS® pediatric scales
- 555 Downloads
The study objective was to describe the individual item-level discrepancies between children ages 8–17 years and their parents for the PROMIS® pediatric scales. Contextual effects on item-level informant discrepancies for the pediatric pain interference items were further analyzed conditional on whether the child, the parent, or anyone else in the household experienced chronic pain.
Parallel pediatric self-report and parent proxy-report items were completed by approximately 300 parent–child dyads depending on form assignment and individual nonresponse. Agreement between parent and child responses to individual items was measured using the polychoric correlation coefficient and weighted κ. The Chi-square test of symmetry was utilized for a comparison of the pattern of parent–child item discrepancies on the response scales, and the differences between the child and parent responses on the 1–5 item response scale are summarized .
A continuum of higher item-level parent–child discrepancies was demonstrated starting with peer relationships, anger, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, followed by progressively lower parent–child discrepancies for energy, fatigue, asthma impact, pain interference, upper extremity, and mobility items. Parent–child discrepancies for pain interference items were lower in the context of chronic pain either in the child or in the parent.
Parent–child item-level discrepancies were lower for more objective or visible items than for items measuring internal states or less observable items measuring latent variables such as peer relationships and fatigue. Future research should focus on the child and parent characteristics that influence domain-specific item-level discrepancies, and under what conditions item-level parent–child discrepancies predict child health outcomes.
KeywordsPROMIS Patient-reported outcomes Pediatrics Informant discrepancies Item response theory Pain
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
Health-related quality of life
National Institutes of Health
Item response theory
Computerized adaptive testing
- 2.Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-report outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S22–S31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 794–804.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Varni, J. W., Magnus, B., Stucky, B. D., Liu, Y., Quinn, H., Thissen, D., et al. (2014). Psychometric properties of the PROMIS® pediatric scales: Precision, stability, and comparison of different scoring and administration options. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1233–1243.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Yeatts, K., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., DeWitt, E. M., et al. (2010). Construction of the Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Asthma, 47, 295–302.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life? An analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 1–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: An analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(2), 1–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Irwin, D. E., Gross, H. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2012). Development of six PROMIS pediatrics parent proxy-report item banks. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(22), 1–13.Google Scholar
- 17.Varni, J. W., Thissen, D., Stucky, B. D., Liu, Y., Magnus, B., Quinn, H., et al. (2014). PROMIS® parent proxy report scales for children ages 5–7 years: An item response theory analysis of differential item functioning across age groups. Quality of Life Research, 23, 349–361.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Drasgow, F. (1986). Polychoric and polyserial correlations. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 7, pp. 68–74). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 27.Cicchetti, D. V., & Allison, T. (1971). A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings. American Journal of EEG Technology, 11, 101–109.Google Scholar
- 28.SAS. (2008). SAS/STAT ® 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- 30.Rescorla, L. A., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., et al. (2013). Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported problems in 25 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 262–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quinones, K. (2008). Whose depression relates to discrepancies? Testing relations between informant characteristics and informant discrepancies from both informants’ perspectives. Psychological Assessment, 20, 139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Lane, M. M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(34), 1–9.Google Scholar