Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were originally developed for comparing groups of people in clinical trials and population studies, and the results were used to support treatment recommendations or inform health policy, but there was not direct benefit for the participants providing PROs data. However, as the experience in using those measures increased, it became obvious the clinical value in using individual patient PROs profiles in daily practice to identify/monitor symptoms, evaluate treatment outcomes and support shared decision-making. A key issue limiting successful implementation is clinicians’ lack of knowledge on how to effectively utilize PROs data in their clinical encounters.
Using a change management theoretical framework, this paper describes the development and implementation of three programs for training clinicians to effectively use PRO data in routine practice. The training programs are in three diverse clinical areas (adult oncology, lung transplant and paediatrics), in three countries with different healthcare systems, thus providing a rare opportunity to pull out common approaches whilst recognizing specific settings. For each program, we describe the clinical and organizational setting, the program planning and development, the content of the training session with supporting material, subsequent monitoring of PROs use and evidence of adoption. The common successful components and practical steps are identified, leading to discussion and future recommendations.
The results of the three training programs are described as the implementation. In the oncology program, PRO data have been developed and are currently evaluated; in the lung transplant program, PRO data are used in daily practice and the integration with electronic patient records is under development; and in the paediatric program, PRO data are fully implemented with around 7,600 consultations since the start of the implementation.
Adult learning programs teaching clinicians how to use and act on PROs in clinical practice are a key steps in supporting patient engagement and participation in shared decision-making. Researchers and clinicians from different clinical areas should collaborate to share ideas, develop guidelines and promote good practice in patient-centred care.
KeywordsPatient-reported outcome measures Training clinicians Use and implementation in clinical practice
We are grateful to our colleagues for their interest and participation in the training sessions. Dr. David Feeny has a proprietary interest in Health Utilities Incorporated (HUInc), Dundas, Ontario, Canada. HUInc distributes copyrighted HUI materials and provides methodological advice on the use of HUI. The other co-authors report no other conflict of interest in this work.
- 1.US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2014) Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims.Google Scholar
- 2.Jensen, R. E., Snyder, C. F., Abernethy, A. P., et al. (2013). Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. Journal of Oncology Practice, 10, 215–222.Google Scholar
- 13.Velikova, G., Sheppard, S., Campbell, L., Smith, A., Awad, N., Selby, P., & Brown, J. (2008). Randomized trial of quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice: Do oncologists need to know. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 15S.Google Scholar
- 20.Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
- 21.Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become (pp. 114, 199–217). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
- 22.Holch, P., Absolom, K., & Velikova, G. (2014). Development and preliminary evaluation of guidelines for emotional distress management in oncology practise. Psychooncology, 23(suppl. 2), 13.Google Scholar
- 23.Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Warrington, L., et al. (2014). Using a patient reported outcome measure in chemotherapy review consultations: The impact of an interactive doctor training session. Quality of Life Research (Submitted).Google Scholar
- 24.Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2013). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality Life Research, 9(3), 371–379.Google Scholar